Official Israel Vs. Iran 2025 thread: First post updates! US/Israel attacks set Iran back months at best. Ceasefire in effect. Everybody wins(?)

Brian O'Conner

All Star
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
2,509
Reputation
451
Daps
7,147
Any country with nuclear power or a functional nuclear power plant can easily obtain a weapon from there, in a matter of weeks. Iran has stable nuclear power and they recently upped their supply far past the point of what’s necessary to run their country. Iran’s first nuclear power plant went live only 10 years ago.

All I’m saying is if your enemy does anything suspicious with nuclear payloads, especially if they’ve launched missiles at you, you probably want to pay attention and be way more defensive/aggressive when you can.

I hate what Israel has done like most people, but in this case I can’t blame them either. From Israel’s point of view, once Iran gets that nuke it’s over. I’m looking at it purely from a view of preservation and survival on their end.
Why should they survive they shouldn’t be there to begin with
 

Robbie3000

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
31,197
Reputation
5,914
Daps
139,135
Reppin
NULL
Any country with nuclear power or a functional nuclear power plant can easily obtain a weapon from there, in a matter of weeks. Iran has stable nuclear power and they recently upped their supply far past the point of what’s necessary to run their country. Iran’s first nuclear power plant went live only 10 years ago.

All I’m saying is if your enemy does anything suspicious with nuclear payloads, especially if they’ve launched missiles at you, you probably want to pay attention and be way more defensive/aggressive when you can.

I hate what Israel has done like most people, but in this case I can’t blame them either. From Israel’s point of view, once Iran gets that nuke it’s over. I’m looking at it purely from a view of preservation and survival on their end.

All that would happen is there would be a balance of power in the region. Whites don’t tolerate balance of power. They always need to dominate other groups.
 

Seoul Gleou

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Feb 11, 2017
Messages
14,956
Reputation
10,732
Daps
94,315
Reppin
McDowell's
Iran hasn’t been reporting honestly. The IAEA said something about them having no need to increase enrichment to the point they did unless they were going for a weapon.

They had nuclear power running at levels that were sufficient to power the whole country, then they started to have plenty more nuclear activity that was found they didn’t report. The kind of activity regarding the development of nuclear weapons.



So if you’re running your nation fine as is with regards to the power grid, why do you increase your stockpile of highly enriched uranium by 50%? That’s way more than you need.

It sounds like they’ve moved (or it’s already there) that stockpile to their underground nuclear facility which’ll take that 60% to 90%, the yield needed for weapons grade uranium, a process that only takes a few weeks (going from 0.7% to 60% takes years and they’ve already done that).

You combine that with all the nuclear talk surrounding Iran, the fact they’re running operations a mile underground and 99% chance they’re going for the nuclear weapon.

Hmm wonder why Ritchie "Tel Aviv" Torres would cast doubt

 

IIVI

Superstar
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
14,742
Reputation
3,856
Daps
53,193
Reppin
Los Angeles
Hmm wonder why Ritchie "Tel Aviv" Torres would cast doubt


I mean even regardless of what that guy says, the fact Iran has nuclear reactors and a functional nuclear power plant it means if you got to take anything they do regarding anything nuclear seriously. From that point it takes a trivial amount of work to create a nuclear weapon. That’s not politics, that’s Physics.

If Russia saw Slovenia, Finland and Ukraine (all of which have nuclear reactors) all start stockpiling an excess of their uranium, they’d be right to start being paranoid as well. Even small reports and rumors of that kind of activity you’d have to take seriously.

It’s not like some poor country with zero nuclear reactors saying they’re making nukes. That was Iran in the 90’s/2000’s. Now you’re actually talking about a legit nuclear powered country displaying extra activity. That’s something else entirely.
 
Last edited:

hashmander

Hale End
Supporter
Joined
Jan 17, 2013
Messages
20,563
Reputation
5,404
Daps
88,756
Reppin
The Arsenal
Iran hasn’t been reporting honestly. The IAEA said something about them having no need to increase enrichment to the point they did unless they were going for a weapon.

They had nuclear power running at levels that were sufficient to power the whole country, then they started to have plenty more nuclear activity that was found they didn’t report. The kind of activity regarding the development of nuclear weapons.



So if you’re running your nation fine as is with regards to the power grid, why do you increase your stockpile of highly enriched uranium by 50%? That’s way more than you need.

It sounds like they’ve moved (or it’s already there) that stockpile to their underground nuclear facility which’ll take that 60% to 90%, the yield needed for weapons grade uranium, a process that only takes a few weeks (going from 0.7% to 60% takes years and they’ve already done that).

You combine that with all the nuclear talk surrounding Iran, the fact they’re running operations a mile underground and 99% chance they’re going for the nuclear weapon.

only countries without nukes get invaded. as for the iranians living under that oppressive regime, having nukes doesn't mean the ayatollah and his friends can't be overthrown by iranians because what are they going to do, let of nukes inside their own homeland to stop it? if israel can have them so can iran. seems like the fear is that if iran has nukes then the west doesn't have that leverage over them, we have to leave them alone like north korea. we don't like you, but we can't do anything to you other than more sanctions.
 

hashmander

Hale End
Supporter
Joined
Jan 17, 2013
Messages
20,563
Reputation
5,404
Daps
88,756
Reppin
The Arsenal
I mean even regardless of what that guy says, the fact Iran has nuclear reactors and a functional nuclear power plant it means if you got to take anything they do regarding anything nuclear seriously. From that point it takes a trivial amount of work to create a nuclear weapon. That’s not politics, that’s Physics.

If Russia saw Slovenia, Finland and Ukraine (all of which have nuclear reactors) all start stockpiling an excess of their uranium, they’d be right to start being paranoid as well. Even small reports and rumors of that kind of activity you’d have to take seriously.

It’s not like some poor country with zero nuclear reactors saying they’re making nukes. That was Iran in the 90’s/2000’s. Now you’re actually talking about a legit nuclear powered country displaying extra activity. That’s something else entirely.
no they wouldn't be right to be paranoid about slovenia, finland or ukraine attacking them. no one just casually uses nukes because it's coming right back at you, it's a self-defense weapon since japan. the only reason russia would be paranoid is because they would be like "oh my god we can't invade them in the future (well they already did ukraine so)."
 

THE 101

House Painter
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
16,224
Reputation
7,170
Daps
81,113
a
SO U DOUBT THAT WE ARE SURROUNDED BY NATIONS WHOS GOAL IS TO ELIMINATE US AND HAS BEEN FOR OVER 100 YEARS?


U GENUINELY BELIEVE ITS SOMETHING WE RANDOMLY MADE UP??


LOL!

Surrounded by hostile nations? This fat wigger acting like Israel just got unlucky with some unfriendly neighbors :heh:

You're a fake country who deebo'd the land and whose existance is founded on white colonization of the Middle East. Ya'll shouldn't have moved there in the first place and don't quote the bible at me fakkit :umad:
 

IIVI

Superstar
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
14,742
Reputation
3,856
Daps
53,193
Reppin
Los Angeles
no they wouldn't be right to be paranoid about slovenia, finland or ukraine attacking them. no one just casually uses nukes because it's coming right back at you, it's a self-defense weapon since japan. the only reason russia would be paranoid is because they would be like "oh my god we can't invade them in the future (well they already did ukraine so)."
Which is my point. Paranoid, weary, cautious, hesitant, whatever you want to call it. A nuclear country hiking up activity will be taken very seriously by the region.

If Mexico (also has many nuclear reactors) started going for 60% enrichment and started stockpiling more uranium than necessary you best believe Republicans would start getting concerned as well. Will Mexico ever use them on us, probably not but it’d trigger a lot of bells if they started ramping up.
 
Top