These are the legal grounds everyone said they should’ve used in the first place.
put your faith in, out of touch ivory tower lawyers brehsThey did tell him to use it the first time b, why you think he redacted that letter? He chose what he chose for political purposes. Living up to your username b @Worthless Loser
Just fake leftists and #BothSides'ers jumping through hoops to not hold Republicans accountable...They obviously went about it the first way because it was a unique scenario that would allow them to use the time limited approach and continue to test their executive powers.
That said, I'm not sure why folks are saying we told him to do it that way approach when y'all were also saying the other approach should work because they didn't have standing to challenge it.
I understand some folks are lawyers and enjoy the gamesmasnhip of legal theory and argumentation.
They didn’t. That was the whole point of the dissent. But you can’t account for this court saying fukk precedent. They could very well find a way to fukk over this way too.They obviously went about it the first way because it was a unique scenario that would allow them to use the time limited approach and continue to test their executive powers.
That said, I'm not sure why folks are saying we told him to do it that way approach when y'all were also saying the other approach should work because they didn't have standing to challenge it.
Let's see them keep that same energy in 2024 
