Official War With Iran Thread

[Loose]

How you can read what I said and come away thinking I'm upset over the US being called out or that the US is justified in any way for starting this illegal war blows my mind. You need to log off the internet and reevaluate your mental state, because the way you're actively projecting a narrative onto me is weird.

I don't really care about what you considered, either. I'm not on anybody's side.

Typical loser shyt , the guy who said I'm "whitewashing the actions of an autocratic theocracy" which no one in here has done.we were talking about a war of war crimes and you proceeded to come in here babbling that shyt now escaping with I'm projecting an argument for him . yea you right with someone needing to log off, its you get some help my brotha

 

[mastermind]

I’m with Aaron here

I think the US or Israel will drop a nuke as well.

 

[Hood Critic]

None of the countries involved have leverage to use a nuclear weapon.

But they will attack civilian targets.

 

[Pull Up the Roots]

Typical loser shyt , the guy who said I'm "whitewashing the actions of an autocratic theocracy" which no one in here has done.we were talking about a war of war crimes and you proceeded to come in here babbling that shyt now escaping with I'm projecting an argument for him . yea you right with someone needing to log off, its you get some help my brotha

I actually believe Iran would follow rules of engagement unlike the united states that is openly bragging about committing war crimes (with our troops including the one who escaped BTW).

You were wrong when you said this, so either you were deliberately whitewashing or engaging in motivated reasoning. You're reacting this way because you know I was right. It's why you projected a convenient motive on me instead of engaging with what I said.

I honestly don't see how you're not what you're accusing others of being. You were dead WRONG in your claim that Iran would adhere to the "rules of engagement" when existing evidence proves they wouldn't. Your campist worldview has you downplaying, excusing, or outright ignoring Iran's own actions simply because you believe they are justified as a reaction to US aggression.

The thing I don't like about people like you is the moral grandstanding while whitewashing the actions of an autocratic theocracy. The US is definitely the aggressor here, and Iran has a right to defend itself against this illegitimate war of aggression, but that doesn't make acknowledging their own actions "Trump apologia," it just means people aren't being selectively blind.

This was my first reply to you, so there was no reveal coming to light. You're just a nutcase who thinks people are defending the US or justifying its actions, just because they're not using the same rhetoric as you. But I explicitly said the US is the aggressor and that nothing Iran has done justifies us being there, let alone justifies the numerous violations of international law the US/Israel are responsible for. My only point is that claiming Iran would follow rules of engagement isn't supported by evidence. Can you address that instead of assigning motives to me?

 

[Serious]

It’s good the pilot was rescued but they should never have been in this situation!

We are where we are now. There’s no go back now, ain’t that the saying @DEAD7

 

[CrimsonTider]

I actually believe Iran would follow rules of engagement unlike the united states that is openly bragging about committing war crimes (with our troops including the one who escaped BTW).

Iran openly kills its own citizens by the thousands.

 

[Loose]

Iran openly kills its own citizens by the thousands.

What exactly does this have to do with the topic of discussion?

You were wrong when you said this, so either you were deliberately whitewashing or engaging in motivated reasoning. You're reacting this way because you know I was right. It's why you projected a convenient motive on me instead of engaging with what I said.


This was my first reply to you, so there was no reveal coming to light. You're just a nutcase who thinks people are defending the US or justifying its actions, just because they're not using the same rhetoric as you. But I explicitly said the US is the aggressor and that nothing Iran has done justifies us being there, let alone justifies the numerous violations of international law the US/Israel are responsible for. My only point is that claiming Iran would follow rules of engagement isn't supported by evidence. Can you address that instead of assigning motives to me?

Listen, you don’t have to preface every discussion about a Middle Eastern country by saying it’s a terrible country before talking about war crimes. Many of these governments are deeply authoritarian, whether theocracies or dictatorships like Bahrain, the UAE, or Saudi Arabia. But acknowledging that these governments are oppressive does not mean we should engage in illegal wars or justify the killing of civilians. It also doesn’t mean we should abandon a rules‑based order when it comes to military engagement. Right now, we’re the ones destroying schools, bridges, power plants, nuclear facilities, oil fields, pharmaceutical sites, and entire residential blocks. In this situation, we are acting as the aggressor the united states is the genocidal terrorist group. We are the ones with the capacity and likely to drop a MOAB or even a nuclear weapon on civilian infrastructure. The reality is that we are behaving like the terrible country here, and our military is the one committing war crimes. And yes IRAN is more likely to follow rules based order than the current united states military that is targeting girls schools and leveling apartment blocks.

 

[Pressure]

Word?

Trump war apologia babble. This like when c00ns try to both sides

So me saying Iran is a destabilizing force for GCC nations means that I support the Trump administration pulling out of the nuclear deal, negotiating under bad faith, launching a war they created on their own, without approval from congress, and ultimately making the lives worse for everyone around the world and at home?



Go out on a weight vest and take a walk. Clear your head. And stop projecting these strawmen on people.

It works for YouTube views and not for you

 

[mastermind]

None of the countries involved have leverage to use a nuclear weapon.

But they will attack civilian targets.

there is no leverage to start this war, so I don't see how you can say that with certainty. (granted, me saying I think teh US or Israel will drop a nuke is similar)

 

[ArchStanton]

I don't know if he would use a nuke or not, but he sure as hell seems to be threatening to use one, and that's not exactly a thought I want to hear is rattling around in his diseased brain.

 

[iamduval]

Why do y’all keep mentioning nuclear weapons? It’s not needed here.

 

[wire28]

You are the most worthless poster on this site. It’s Easter. Spend some time wit you family if they’re still around.

That’s quite the accomplishment considering the company he keeps on here.

The idea that you believe Iran isn’t a destabilizing force in their own region amongst GCC nations just shows you aren’t worth the discussion.

The funny thing is YOU can comprehend that Iran has no choice but to terrorize other uninvolved countries and their civilians !!

And what about Trump ain’t some get out of jail free card when you idiots been calling it vindication.

They been getting whipped back and forth for years by that algo it was funny at first now it’s just sad and actually kind of scary

 

[wire28]

I honestly don't see how you're not what you're accusing others of being. You were dead WRONG in your claim that Iran would adhere to the "rules of engagement" when existing evidence proves they wouldn't. Your campist worldview has you downplaying, excusing, or outright ignoring Iran's own actions simply because you believe they are justified as a reaction to US aggression.

The thing I don't like about people like you is the moral grandstanding while whitewashing the actions of an autocratic theocracy. The US is definitely the aggressor here, and Iran has a right to defend itself against this illegitimate war of aggression, but that doesn't make acknowledging their own actions "Trump apologia," it just means people aren't being selectively blind.

Uh oh yall know this nikka got tired of the bullshyt a long time ago

How you can read what I said and come away thinking I'm upset over the US being called out or that the US is justified in any way for starting this illegal war blows my mind. You need to log off the internet and reevaluate your mental state, because the way you're actively projecting a narrative onto me is weird.

I don't really care about what you considered, either. I'm not on anybody's side.

I told him about better help a long time ago. It was a genuine recommendation. And the offer still stands.