Official War With Iran Thread

Hood Critic

The Power Circle
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
26,282
Reputation
4,356
Daps
117,885
Reppin
דעת
Stupid idiot saw what happened to Trump's last VP and instead of running the other way took the job. I guess if Trump doesn't call a mob to hang him, he'll end up a winner.

Little Marco sold his soul but nobody ever tries to kill the secretary of state.
Ironically, little Marco was at UFC in over sized shoes when he should have been in Islamabad. Vance should really feel hung out to dry.
 

Serious

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
81,564
Reputation
14,928
Daps
194,347
Reppin
1st Round Playoff Exits
This is another desperate, moronic move. Preventing Iran from exporting oil will just make the global economic crisis worse faster.

I expect Trump to go back to threatening to nuke Iran within 72 hours.
Man I’m over it.

All the bs posturing and lying, just rip the bandaid off at this point.

The sooner we lay boots on the ground the sooner we can focus on how to end this shyt.


And I mean from the point of view of this being a disastrous move, that the pubic doesn’t support.
 

WTFisWallace?

All Star
Joined
May 24, 2022
Messages
1,870
Reputation
349
Daps
6,016
Reppin
Dade County
I think similar to Ukraine, Trump is having trouble fathoming national pride and dignity.
:ehh: Trump routinely calls several American cities “shytholes”.

Trump routinely demonizes damn near 40% of the population.

Trump salivates at using (not by at his own hand of course, that would be too much work for him) deadly force against the US population.

Trump thinks people who sign up for the military are generally losers.



Trump/MAGA routinely project their inner feelings/doings thru accusations. Hard to believe someone else would have national pride, dignity, or just general principles….when you have none of your own or any desire to get some. He must literally go “ain’t no fukking way :dahell:” when he see others stand for nothing else than country & morals.
 

Loose

Retired Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
55,326
Reputation
3,322
Daps
155,143
You left out the part where that same JCPOA that they were divided over is also how we ended up with the $3.8B MOU to Israel.

That's an important point to include if we're going to continue to act as if Biden's issue with the JCPOA was to have latitude to assist Israel.
Unless you're arguing the JCPOA was a bad deal to defend Biden, you can add whatever caveat you want to the discussion, he underlying result is the same. The result is: BIDEN was not a fan of the JCPOA which is why democrats overwhelmingly do not attack Trump from entering the program which was successful.
 

mitter

All Star
Joined
Jan 24, 2013
Messages
4,003
Reputation
192
Daps
11,367
Reppin
NULL
Man I’m over it.

All the bs posturing and lying, just rip the bandaid off at this point.

The sooner we lay boots on the ground the sooner we can focus on how to end this shyt.


And I mean from the point of view of this being a disastrous move, that the pubic doesn’t support.


It will take more than a million "boots on the ground" to overthrow the Iranian regime. Where are those troops going to come from?

And even if they manage that, does the US have the will to stay in Iran indefinitely to prevent the people they overthrew from coming back into power?

I just don't think the American public will support another Afghanistan/Iraq-style prolonged war and occupation in this day and age. Trump, for all of his idiocy, understands that very well. I honestly think there is a much higher chance of use of a nuclear bomb than an attempt to overthrow the Iranian regime with a massive ground force.
 
Last edited:

WTFisWallace?

All Star
Joined
May 24, 2022
Messages
1,870
Reputation
349
Daps
6,016
Reppin
Dade County
A blockade relies on Iran giving a fukk in a situation where they most likely wont give a single one. Pretty similar to taking Kharg Island.

I guess they saw China putting pressure on Iran to sit and negotiate with the US and want to try and see if that works with a blockade.

Don't think it's gonna work. Mainly because they gonna be putting more pressure on their own (U.S) allies with strait continuing to be closed and resuming the back and forth bombing that hurts the GCC more than anyone else.
I think I heard the full brunt of the lack of oil is even being felt yet because the world to some degree is operating on the oil that ship just before the Strait of Hormuz was closed.





:mjlol: Would be hilarious to see Iran simply go “…ok”


‘if we all go to hell, it’ll be worth it’
:demonic:
 

Hood Critic

The Power Circle
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
26,282
Reputation
4,356
Daps
117,885
Reppin
דעת
Unless you're arguing the JCPOA was a bad deal to defend Biden, you can add whatever caveat you want to the discussion, he underlying result is the same. The result is: BIDEN was not a fan of the JCPOA which is why democrats overwhelmingly do not attack Trump from entering the program which was successful.
You're playing loose with that idea and your own opinions. He didn't like aspects of JCPOA and there are a lot of people who feel like he acquiesced to the Iranians in negotiations with them to re-enter the JCPOA and on the release of American hostages.

You're attempting to make a logical leap that has anything to do with D's not being harder on Trump for pulling out.

He definitely failed to get Iran back in but you all's assumptions are off the mark.

 

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
94,186
Reputation
3,917
Daps
167,770
Reppin
Brooklyn

Loose

Retired Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
55,326
Reputation
3,322
Daps
155,143
You're playing loose with that idea and your own opinions. He didn't like aspects of JCPOA and there are a lot of people who feel like he
acquiesced to the Iranians in negotiations with them to re-enter the JCPOA and on the release of American hostages

You're attempting to make a logical leap that has anything to do with D's not being harder on Trump for pulling out.

He definitely failed to get Iran back in but you all's assumptions are off the mark.

So what is your point here.

You:

A. Agree biden was not a fan of the JCPOA
B. Biden and and hardline dems did not want to in your words"acquiesced to the Iranians in negotiations with them to re-enter the JCPOA and on the release of American hostages"

You agree that Biden and the Schumer wing was not a fan of JCPOA and did not want to go back in the deal. Therefore we can safely conclude they do not criticize Trump for exiting the deal because they're not fans of the deal. Very fair assumption
 

Hood Critic

The Power Circle
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
26,282
Reputation
4,356
Daps
117,885
Reppin
דעת
So what is your point here.

You:

A. Agree biden was not a fan of the JCPOA
B. Biden and and hardline dems did not want to in your words"acquiesced to the Iranians in negotiations with them to re-enter the JCPOA and on the release of American hostages"
That's not what I said champ, you might want to read what I said versus skimming or whatever you're doing.

You agree that Biden and the Schumer wing was not a fan of JCPOA and did not want to go back in the deal. Therefore we can safely conclude they do not criticize Trump for exiting the deal because they're not fans of the deal. Very fair assumption
I do not agree with that, Biden clearly wanted some form of a deal, the evidence is literally there.

That's my point, you can't "safely conclude" anything other than they tried and failed to get Iran back into the deal. There is evidence of the contrary.

Why is any of this relevant? It goes back to the original conversation that Kamala had no reason to escalate and do anything differently than what was already being done via the Biden administration. So no, Kamala would not have authorized a military strike against Iran. A clear contrast to the soft shoeing you all were doing to avoid having a good answer for not having MORE smoke for the administration who actively conducting genocide versus the one you say enabled one.
 

Loose

Retired Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
55,326
Reputation
3,322
Daps
155,143
I do not agree with that, Biden clearly wanted some form of a deal, the evidence is literally there.
Dog wtf are you even arguing? Biden wanted " some form of the deal" is hilariois to read, you're playing schematics while trying to argue biden wanted to jump back in, this is the public relations ass thing the democrat politicans do that voters hate :dead:

Biden either wanted the JCPOA deal or not, not some form of the deal
 

Spidey Man

Superstar
Joined
Jun 1, 2012
Messages
12,534
Reputation
1,846
Daps
37,331
Reppin
NULL
Glad I took a 401k loan to protect myself from the upcoming Trump Golden Depression or Stagflation. Man is doing a great job for his master in Moscow.
 

Loose

Retired Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
55,326
Reputation
3,322
Daps
155,143
Glad I took a 401k loan to protect myself from the upcoming Trump Golden Depression or Stagflation. Man is doing a great job for his master in Moscow.
I'd argue he works for China, Trump has been nothing but beneficial for their growth and future dominance Irregardless of his sanctions.
 
Top