OJ Simpson did not kill his ex-wife and her friend

#1 pick

The Smart Negroes
Supporter
Joined
Jul 13, 2012
Messages
77,856
Reputation
11,650
Daps
200,698
Reppin
Lamb of God
:heh: @jadillac sit this one out breh or go do some of your own research

It always bothers me to hear brothers like him talk on this subject. I think they get sold on this being the media spectacle of white-black and forget this case actually had a trial with witnesses, jurors, tainted evidence by the LAPD, great lawyers on both sides, top tier judge, and a Bronco chase :gladbron: . Just too much nonsense that was made for Hollywood. This trial was a joke from day 1. The prosecution knew this wasn't O.J.. Ferhman knew this wasn't O.J.. They are top notch at their job. They knew who did it but this was all Hollywood and everyone got major bread. Hollywood came out of the trial like :myman:
CourtTV, Nancy Grace got a TV show, everyone :eat: off of this. Poor Johnnie though, he never could win s**t again because whites assumed his defended was guilty no matter what due to O.J. :lupe: Then he died not too long afterwards. RIP.


This case doesn't make O.J. innocent because that nikka covered up for his son but it makes him a father who loves his son and is willing to take the bullet for his son to have a life even if O.J.'s one is forever broken. While I do not know what I would have did if my son killed my wife and some dude. I do know it would be hard on me. So I understand, but I don't agree. I ain't gonna say O.J. should have just went to the police. I ain't gonna say O.J. should have ran like he did. You just never know what you gonna do in the heat of the moment. Damn, that trial was memorizing. Watching those trials live as a kid then again for like 10 hours as a teen gives you a different perspective.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

jadillac

Veteran
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
56,868
Reputation
9,432
Daps
175,722
:heh: @jadillac sit this one out breh or go do some of your own research

So I need to "sit this out", but y'all are in here laying the murders on OJ's son? With no evidence whatsover.... :rudy:

Dudes in here talking about OJ son had a motive b/c he wanted her to eat at his restaurant and his feelings were hurt or he was jealous.

What is this the twilight zone?

That oreo ain't gonna listen to you. He got his facts from Nancy Grace and CNN Crossfire :rudy: . He trust them before doing any actual watching of the trial or looking at all motives first. You know, the TV never lies especially when it's a white man or woman talking. Don't forget, O.J. is this big scary black man. Goldman is in Karate... kids do karate, :pachaha: That's like Tae-bo right :pachaha: tryna work it out. #c00nery4life :smugbiden:

I'm pretty sure I mentioned earlier that much of this case was based aroudn racism.

But I guess you conveniently ignored that as you do much of everything else.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

#1 pick

The Smart Negroes
Supporter
Joined
Jul 13, 2012
Messages
77,856
Reputation
11,650
Daps
200,698
Reppin
Lamb of God
So I need to "sit this out", but y'all are in here laying the murders on OJ's son? With no evidence whatsover.... :rudy:

Dudes in here talking about OJ son had a motive b/c he wanted her to eat at his restaurant and his feelings were hurt or he was jealous.

What is this the twilight zone?



I'm pretty sure I mentioned earlier that much of this case was based aroudn racism.

But I guess you conveniently ignored that as you do much of everything else.

I hope you don't think just because you are grammatically correct means you know what the hell you are talking about in this case? Man, here's what you need to do.

1. Take about two to three weeks for a 30 mins-hour to watch the trial.
2. Take Cliffnotes.
3. If you can, get 10 others do join you in this. Make sure they of all races. More of them being white and young.
4. Then do a mock trial with those who watched with you.
5. Then check out the book on O.J. is Innocent and I Can Prove It by William Dear or just watch the video. There is a chopped up youtube video on it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&v=QG5CPhGoT3M&NR=1

Come back to me with your information and then talk on this case.

Until then, you are just giving silly opinions on something you have no clue about.
 

Quarterback

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JCOaI06zAvg
Joined
Mar 2, 2013
Messages
2,894
Reputation
-385
Daps
3,881
Reppin
Where many murders occur
Let's look at the evidence on both sides...

Evidence for guilty verdict:

  • OJ's blood was found at the murder scene
  • Nicole and Ron's blood was found in the Bronco
  • OJ was a known coke user, which may have set him off that night
  • OJ describes himself doing it in If I Did It
  • Cut on his finger
  • Sweaty and disheveled when in the limo
  • Suicidal after he was charged with murder
  • Bloody glove and socks

Evidence for Not Guilty verdict:

  • All evidence could have been planted by the PD so they wouldn't look incompetent

Idk, the book he wrote felt like it was honest and from the heart. In it, he describes how he did it and how his son helped. It feels like the truth.

I don't trust cacs one iota, but it just seems that he did indeed do it with his son as accomplice. It's all fukked up. He's a piece of shyt and so was that blonde cacette, who had a man jaw. fukk them all.
 

Mac

Ready for the Beach #Summer2k16
Joined
Jun 1, 2012
Messages
528
Reputation
90
Daps
605
Reppin
Pretty af.
I actually watched a show about a serial killer, I think his name was Glen Roberts. On the show, his brother said that Glen told him he was going to kill Nicole and rob her. Women were always his victims. Afterwards, Nicole was murdered and the only eye witness was a man walking his dog. Who specifically stated that the man he saw out side the property was either white, hispanic, or asian . Who knows.
 

Reality

Make your own luck.
Joined
Jun 16, 2012
Messages
7,189
Reputation
4,215
Daps
38,378
Reppin
NULL
Let's look at the evidence on both sides...

Evidence for guilty verdict:

  • OJ's blood was found at the murder scene
  • Nicole and Ron's blood was found in the Bronco
  • OJ was a known coke user, which may have set him off that night
  • OJ describes himself doing it in If I Did It
  • Cut on his finger
  • Sweaty and disheveled when in the limo
  • Suicidal after he was charged with murder
  • Bloody glove and socks

Evidence for Not Guilty verdict:

  • All evidence could have been planted by the PD so they wouldn't look incompetent

Idk, the book he wrote felt like it was honest and from the heart. In it, he describes how he did it and how his son helped. It feels like the truth.

I don't trust cacs one iota, but it just seems that he did indeed do it with his son as accomplice. It's all fukked up. He's a piece of shyt and so was that blonde cacette, who had a man jaw. fukk them all.
:dead:

that's what's always killed me about this. she wasnt even a pawg and she looked like gronkowski w/ a wig on. Ls all around.

get married brehs
 

#1 pick

The Smart Negroes
Supporter
Joined
Jul 13, 2012
Messages
77,856
Reputation
11,650
Daps
200,698
Reppin
Lamb of God
Let's look at the evidence on both side...

Evidence for guilty verdict:

  • OJ's blood was found at the murder scene
  • Nicole and Ron's blood was found in the Bronco
  • OJ was a known coke user, which may have set him off that night
  • OJ describes himself doing it in If I Did It
  • Cut on his finger
  • Sweaty and disheveled when in the limo
  • Suicidal after he was charged with murder
  • Bloody glove and socks

Evidence for Not Guilty verdict:

  • All evidence could have been planted by the PD so they wouldn't look incompetent

Idk, the book he wrote felt like it was honest and from the heart. In it, he describes how he did it and how his son helped. It feels like the truth.

O.J. was at the murder scene. O.J. knew about the murders. That's a fact, not just an opinion.
LAPD
He used coke, not sure if he was addict like Nicole was but that has little to do with this case. Some said the person who killed Nicole could have been a dealer since she always owes them money but they generally get something from that hoe in return.
That book was full of fallacies in general.
Goldman nails too short, Nicole nails had another blood-type, not O.J. at the time of death.
He knew about the murders. That much is known.
Gloves not his, socks well...


Breh, I read the book. He didn't say shyt about Jason. :rudy:

Why you :duck: that part

Breh, please do what I advised jcadillac to do.
 

King Karim

All Star
Bushed
Joined
Jun 14, 2012
Messages
4,584
Reputation
-26,770
Daps
7,178
Reppin
NULL
Let's look at the evidence on both sides...

Evidence for guilty verdict:

  • OJ's blood was found at the murder scene
  • Nicole and Ron's blood was found in the Bronco
  • OJ was a known coke user, which may have set him off that night
  • OJ describes himself doing it in If I Did It
  • Cut on his finger
  • Sweaty and disheveled when in the limo
  • Suicidal after he was charged with murder
  • Bloody glove and socks

Evidence for Not Guilty verdict:

  • All evidence could have been planted by the PD so they wouldn't look incompetent

Idk, the book he wrote felt like it was honest and from the heart. In it, he describes how he did it and how his son helped. It feels like the truth.

I don't trust cacs one iota, but it just seems that he did indeed do it with his son as accomplice. It's all fukked up. He's a piece of shyt and so was that blonde cacette, who had a man jaw. fukk them all.

the problem here on your guilty list is the blood, socks, and glove were all planted by the LAPD. This is now known. when asked about it they repeatedly took the 5th amendment.

this speaks volumes. if it was this obvious OJ was the killer no police dept with this amount of experience, intelligence and resources would go to such great depths
 

Quarterback

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JCOaI06zAvg
Joined
Mar 2, 2013
Messages
2,894
Reputation
-385
Daps
3,881
Reppin
Where many murders occur
That book was full of fallacies in general.
Goldman nails too short, Nicole nails had another blood-type, not O.J. at the time of death.
He knew about the murders. That much is known.
Gloves not his, socks well...


Breh, I read the book. He didn't say shyt about Jason. :rudy:

Why you :duck: that part

Breh, please do what I advised jcadillac to do.
He didn't mention Jason by name, he changed Jason's name to protect him in his book. He described some guy who accompanied him, and it was probably Jason he was referring to.

How was the book full of fallacies? It was Juice talking to us all, man to man. I felt what he was sayin, he was bein real. And he admitted he killed her, which was probably out of love for his children. He didn't want them being raised by that dumb whore.

this speaks volumes. if it was this obvious OJ was the killer no police dept with this amount of experience, intelligence and resources would go to such great depths
It can be argued that they were able to frame him because of their experience, intelligence and resources.
 

Rocket Scientist

Superstar
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
22,153
Reputation
2,584
Daps
40,038
Reppin
High IQ
The part that gets me is The Bronco Chase and why OJ was suicidal.Thats guilt for sure.I could see OJ taking the wrap for Jason,due to their strained relationship.(Its been noted OJ had strained relationships with his 2 oldest children)If OJ was found guilty LA would have had Riots Part II,still surprised to this day how he was acquitted. Simple Put.... The Prosecution didnt prove their case and towards the end of the trial it showed.Cochran (RIP) did his thing and he himself probably knew or knew OJ did it or had something to do with it.Also Mark Fuhrman testifyin :snoop: that was a key part of the trial as well.I honeslty think we will never know who did it.OJ's book,Bronco Chase all points to him tho :manny:
 

#1 pick

The Smart Negroes
Supporter
Joined
Jul 13, 2012
Messages
77,856
Reputation
11,650
Daps
200,698
Reppin
Lamb of God
He didn't mention Jason by name, he changed Jason's name to protect him in his book. He described some guy who accompanied him, and it was probably Jason he was referring to.

How was the book full of fallacies? It was Juice talking to us all, man to man. I felt what he was sayin, he was bein real. And he admitted he killed her, which was probably out of love for his children. He didn't want them being raised by that dumb whore.


It can be argued that they were able to frame him because of their experience, intelligence and resources.

He didn't say anything about Jason. By name or reference. You making things up.

Naw, it was full of fallacies. Nothing was adding up. Some of it seems like a fantasy and not reality based on the trial and new evidence.

Now you adding your own opinion to a fallacies and conjecturing your own analysis when I seen a lot of the heavy work. Even had 1 on 1 with detectives from LAPD which go back ways on this. Some are diehards that O.J. did it. Dude even drew up a map that he had from his PD days and I was like :ehh:. The links you go to make up bs is mighty impressive. You got to give it to them, LAPD some smart dudes but if you can't fake a case especially going up v. decent lawyers much less powerhouse lawyers.

They had all that had to plant stuff and still planted it wrong. They couldn't get everything. They even went to the coroners offices to get her blood samples to plant on the Bronco, etc... The LAPD tried and failed. Just that simple. They had the info, they could have went after the right man but this made Hollywood MILLIONS. This was show, not a trial. The LAPD knew O.J. didn't murder them but it was a game and they played along with it.
 

Quarterback

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JCOaI06zAvg
Joined
Mar 2, 2013
Messages
2,894
Reputation
-385
Daps
3,881
Reppin
Where many murders occur
He didn't say anything about Jason. By name or reference. You making things up.

Naw, it was full of fallacies. Nothing was adding up. Some of it seems like a fantasy and not reality based on the trial and new evidence.

Now you adding your own opinion to a fallacies and conjecturing your own analysis when I seen a lot of the heavy work. Even had 1 on 1 with detectives from LAPD which go back ways on this. Some are diehards that O.J. did it. Dude even drew up a map that he had from his PD days and I was like :ehh:. The links you go to make up bs is mighty impressive. You got to give it to them, LAPD some smart dudes but if you can't fake a case especially going up v. decent lawyers much less powerhouse lawyers.

They had all that had to plant stuff and still planted it wrong. They couldn't get everything. They even went to the coroners offices to get her blood samples to plant on the Bronco, etc... The LAPD tried and failed. Just that simple. They had the info, they could have went after the right man but this made Hollywood MILLIONS. This was show, not a trial. The LAPD knew O.J. didn't murder them but it was a game and they played along with it.
He changed Jason's name to Charlie. He describes a guy named Charlie who accompanies him to Nicole's condo. Charlie was probably Jason.

What specific parts of his book are fantasy? It all seemed legit to me, he was pouring his heart out.

And why would the PD wanna help out Hollywood? Did the producers of the made-for-TV movie pay them to frame him?
 

Bilz

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
16,134
Reputation
1,360
Daps
37,302
Reppin
Los Angeles
So you're telling me in one sentence OJ's son is a bad ass, then in another sentence Ron Golman was a bad ass? Which is it? Was it the clash of the titans?

I dont have any reason to suggest OJ's son couldnt have helped, but to suggest OJ didnt do anything is foolish. Especially when much of the DNA evidence matched him. But tHe LAPD just screwed themselves on that though b/c them being racists was exposed, which tainted much of their credibility.

Again, I dont care about karate. If I jump out the bushes and stab you, you can't get into karate position. And he got stabbed 30-something times. Who's gonna stab someone that many times? Oh I know, a man who wants to make a point about someone sleeping with his wife.

You really don't understand crime of passion do you? What does anything that happened during the trial have to do with proving that wrong? Why because OJ didn't cry or show emotion?

Another thing, this is OJ Simpson one of the greatest RB's ever. Dude was still in shape back then, he was only like 42-43.....he probably did nothing everyday but play tennis, exercise and snort cocaine. He could easily overpower someone from behind and when ur in a rage to kill someone sleeping w/ your wife, no weak ass karate BS is gonna do a thing

OJ did it and everyone(sane) realizes it.



Everybody knows Johnny Cochran "got OJ off" and he himself became a celebrity after that b/c he did what was virtually impossible. Hell he became the celebrity go to lawyer after that.

This is one of the biggest problems I have with the perception of this case. People honestly think there was tons of solid evidence and it all broke down because cops were racist? :mindblown: There was no blood or DNA evidence that wasn't crooked as fukk. All of the OJ blood was found very long after the original arrest and after they had blood samples from OJ that were blatantly mishandled. The reason his blood was at the scene was because they put it there. No one ever denied that it was OJ's blood and no one tried to claim that the crime was carried out by someone who coincidentally had the exact same DNA.

So the cops story is that OJ was able to kill two people with a knife while receiving nothing more than a small self inflicted cut to his own finger? He was also able to hide the murder weapon, had no witnesses, hid the clothes he wore (prosecutors claim he wore a wetsuit and a pair of Bruno Magli shoes :wtf: ) and immediately hopped a flight.

Yet he left a bloody sock in the middle of a white carpet at his home, left a glove in his side yard, and then took a domestic flight when he could have easily got the fukk out of the country :stopitslime:

OJ hung out with losers. Nicole Brown was not the perfect blonde cheerleader she was painted out to be. Fred Goldman was a loser too. Everyone Nicole dealt with was a drugged out loser. Especially her girlfriend that immediately used her fame to pose for playboy despite being :flabbynsick:

I think it's plausible that OJ knows what happened and maybe even had a role in assisting or choreographing it but if you think the evidence in that case pointed to him, you weren't paying attention.
 

jadillac

Veteran
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
56,868
Reputation
9,432
Daps
175,722
The part that gets me is The Bronco Chase and why OJ was suicidal.Thats guilt for sure.I could see OJ taking the wrap for Jason,due to their strained relationship.(Its been noted OJ had strained relationships with his 2 oldest children)If OJ was found guilty LA would have had Riots Part II,still surprised to this day how he was acquitted. Simple Put.... The Prosecution didnt prove their case and towards the end of the trial it showed.Cochran (RIP) did his thing and he himself probably knew or knew OJ did it or had something to do with it.Also Mark Fuhrman testifyin :snoop: that was a key part of the trial as well.I honeslty think we will never know who did it.OJ's book,Bronco Chase all points to him tho :manny:

Same here. And even if OJ didn't do it or didnt know who did it, he damn sure wasn't suicidal over her being dead. He was probably happy. lol

But even the argument for OJ's son doesn't make sense b/c now OJ is taking the possible fall to protect his son? It's possible, but nah. That case was lookin real bad for OJ for a while.

In the end, ur right, the prosecution did a poor job. Chris Darden, Clark, and the LAPD all seemed too eager to get OJ and that messed them up.

This is one of the biggest problems I have with the perception of this case. People honestly think there was tons of solid evidence and it all broke down because cops were racist? :mindblown: There was no blood or DNA evidence that wasn't crooked as fukk. All of the OJ blood was found very long after the original arrest and after they had blood samples from OJ that were blatantly mishandled. The reason his blood was at the scene was because they put it there. No one ever denied that it was OJ's blood and no one tried to claim that the crime was carried out by someone who coincidentally had the exact same DNA.

So the cops story is that OJ was able to kill two people with a knife while receiving nothing more than a small self inflicted cut to his own finger? He was also able to hide the murder weapon, had no witnesses, hid the clothes he wore (prosecutors claim he wore a wetsuit and a pair of Bruno Magli shoes :wtf: ) and immediately hopped a flight.

Yet he left a bloody sock in the middle of a white carpet at his home, left a glove in his side yard, and then took a domestic flight when he could have easily got the fukk out of the country :stopitslime:

OJ hung out with losers. Nicole Brown was not the perfect blonde cheerleader she was painted out to be. Fred Goldman was a loser too. Everyone Nicole dealt with was a drugged out loser. Especially her girlfriend that immediately used her fame to pose for playboy despite being :flabbynsick:

I think it's plausible that OJ knows what happened and maybe even had a role in assisting or choreographing it but if you think the evidence in that case pointed to him, you weren't paying attention.

To me, the killing two ppl is irrelevant b/c one was a woman. He could have duffed her out easily, maybe he even approached her peacefully. Didnt Goldman arrive afterwards? So it was really just one at a time.

Also, him fleeing the country would've been even more suspicious, bruh. At least him going to Chicago(I think) he could say that was for "work".

Plenty of people have been killed with no witness. That's a gated community if I recall. PRobably a somewhat secluded driveway, etc.

The LAPD could've planted something, but I think they would've done a more thorough job if they were trying to set up OJ Simpson. OJ was Tiger Woods at that time. Everybody white loved him.
 

Henzo

Kliq'd Up
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
7,261
Reputation
781
Daps
11,594
I was thinking about posting about this yesterday actually

I used to think he did it, but after reading a few of these articles by dikk Wagner with an open mind, I think it's pretty obvious that he was set up. He didn't say anything because the people who did it would have gotten to his kids and other family/friends.

The O.J. Simpson Case

Read the Introduction articles to start especially "The Bundy Murder Scenario" ( http://davewagner.com/oj/oj/murderscene.htm ). This guy was a great writer. Very convincing with his independent investigations.
 
Top