Ok 😒 this “everyone in history that was important was secretly black” stuff got to stop we looking crazy “Columbas was a black moor” 😒

Leasy

Let's add some Alizarin Crimson & Van Dyke Brown
Supporter
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
46,749
Reputation
4,736
Daps
104,029
Reppin
Philly (BYRD GANG)
And how did “Egyptian Preist Manetho” determine that?

What reference are there to confirm this? “A fragment”?

He started a king list which majority of it is gone some still exist, but 95 percent is gone. Please read up on him. You are talking to someone who has library in his house. This my shyt.
 

Ish Gibor

Omnipresence
Joined
Jan 23, 2017
Messages
5,604
Reputation
860
Daps
7,089
I am saying its hard for Africa because besides Egypt we don't have the records. Africa suffered so much from war/invasions/nature disasters such as the Sahara turning desert etc... its hard to track which nations existed during that time besides Nubia.
Now Africa doesn’t have records? But…, Africa suffered wars and invasions?

So by whom exactly are these wars and invasions?
 

Ish Gibor

Omnipresence
Joined
Jan 23, 2017
Messages
5,604
Reputation
860
Daps
7,089
He started a king list which majority of it is gone some still exist, but 95 percent is gone. Please read up on him. You are talking to someone who has library in his house. This my shyt.
This is indeed your shyt. And that is why 95% is gone. How did you get to that conclusion / number?

Let’s start with how Rome and Greek was formed before they had contact with Egypt.


“Using a genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) panel, we observed population structure in a diverse group of Europeans and European Americans. Under a variety of conditions and tests, there is a consistent and reproducible distinction between “northern” and “southern” European population groups: most individual participants with southern European ancestry (Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, and Greek) have >85% membership in the “southern” population; and most northern, western, eastern, and central Europeans have >90% in the “northern” population group.”

European Population Substructure: Clustering of Northern and Southern Populations

 
Last edited:

Leasy

Let's add some Alizarin Crimson & Van Dyke Brown
Supporter
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
46,749
Reputation
4,736
Daps
104,029
Reppin
Philly (BYRD GANG)
Now Africa doesn’t have records? But…, Africa suffered wars and invasions?

So by whom exactly are these wars and invasions?

Africa was invaded by every fukking civilization known to man. Turks Europeans Greeks Romans Persians etc… majority nations lost a lot. We still missing Phoenicians information/Nubians/West African areas/ etc… We don’t even know where the land of Punt is.

Central Africa had a wall greater than the Great Wall of China that was destroyed who was that civilization get what I am saying.

The information is so fragmented.

Not to change the subject but the tribes of Israel is documented and we know where they at :wow: I
 

Leasy

Let's add some Alizarin Crimson & Van Dyke Brown
Supporter
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
46,749
Reputation
4,736
Daps
104,029
Reppin
Philly (BYRD GANG)
This is indeed your shyt. And that is why 95% is gone. How did you get to that conclusion / number?

Let’s start with how Rome and Greek was formed before they had contact with Egypt.


“Using a genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) panel, we observed population structure in a diverse group of Europeans and European Americans. Under a variety of conditions and tests, there is a consistent and reproducible distinction between “northern” and “southern” European population groups: most individual participants with southern European ancestry (Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, and Greek) have >85% membership in the “southern” population; and most northern, western, eastern, and central Europeans have >90% in the “northern” population group.”

European Population Substructure: Clustering of Northern and Southern Populations

Hmmm we do know the first people of Europe were African and had black skin or brown whatever you want to call it.

Let’s not look at the peopling because they could have came after. Let’s look at the parents of the Greek Roman civilization. The Minoans who from their paintings appear more black than white.

You have to understand and it’s easy to do. If these people didn’t develop where they are form originally but all of a sudden developed when going to a location already populated. They can’t be the creators of that civilization. The further you go back in Greek Roman the blacker it gets. The gods are black so what that tells you.
 

Ish Gibor

Omnipresence
Joined
Jan 23, 2017
Messages
5,604
Reputation
860
Daps
7,089
Africa was invaded by every fukking civilization known to man. Turks Europeans Greeks Romans Persians etc… majority nations lost a lot.
I agree, especially the Romans.



We still missing Phoenicians information/Nubians/West African areas/ etc…
Yes, I agree. And that history is being restored now.

10453.jpg






https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F23ece975-b98e-4a8c-a66d-2b3a2b351c68_890x594.png



https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Ffcba788b-cad8-442e-8514-d4338937f7a8_784x458.jpeg


https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F62121458-9f2c-4fd0-b2c9-fb9e74305658_747x1110.png


https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Ffe3c9603-8e57-41a8-99ed-f38cef23cf44_719x420.png



"IAM people did not possess any of the European SNPs associated with light pigmentation, and most likely had dark skin and eyes. IAM samples contain ancestral alleles for pigmentation-associated variants present in SLC24A5 (rs1426654), SLC45A2(rs16891982), and OCA2 (rs1800401 and 12913832) genes. On the other hand, KEB individuals exhibit some European-derived alleles that predispose individuals to lighter skin and eye color, including those on genes SLC24A5 (rs1426654) and OCA2 (rs1800401) (SI Appendix, Supplementary Note 11)."

(Carlos D. Bustamante, Rosa Fregel,et al., Ancient genomes from North Africa evidence prehistoric migrations to the Maghreb from both the Levant and Europe)

image



Tenerean
Forensic reconstruction, Resin, University of Chicago and Project Exploration

344603_8d670e5ac6c041b59eaf1dcb4a0db6a0~mv2.webp






Kiffian
Forensic reconstruction, Resin, University of Chicago and Project Exploration

344603_3618f9ba76ca4a2cb93efd7129e082ff~mv2.webp




Gobero People
Forensic reconstruction, Resin, University of Chicago and Project Exploration


9hfWGHHs_o.png



We don’t even know where the land of Punt is.
You are all over the place and you’re talking out of your neck.

“Thousands of years ago, there once stood a place called Punt, a land of gold and ebony, and ivory, frankincense and myrrh.

To the pharaohs who built their palaces along the Nile, the Land of Punt was the source of great treasure. Among the most prized were Punt's leopards and baboons, which they viewed as sacred and took as royal pets.

At a recent meeting in Oakland of the American Research Center in Egypt three scientists announced with confidence they had ruled out all of those five locations, and there was no disagreement from the 300 archaeologists there.

The Land of Punt, the scientist said, must have existed in eastern North Africa - either in the region where Ethiopia and Eritrea confront each other, or east of the Upper Nile in a lowland area of eastern Sudan.

ratio2x3_480.webp




1600px-Relief_of_Hatshepsut%27s_expedition_to_the_Land_of_Punt_by_Σταύρος.jpg

The Voyage to Punt Relief. Deir el-Bahri, Egypt Voyage to Punt Relief, 1479-1458 BCE. Sourced from Wikimedia Commons Wikimedia Commons contributors, "File:Relief of Hatshepsut's expedition to the Land of Punt by Σταύρος.jpg," Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository



01-punt-l.jpg

The female pharaoh Hatshepsut told us more about Punt than anyone else in ancient times. But even she is silent on its exact location.

02-punt-l.gif

Proposed locations for Punt are literally all over the map (see article). As one Egyptologist put it, "The variety of geographical placing of the Land of Punt is quite awesome...."


03-punt-l.jpg

One of Hatshepsut's Punt ships setting sail, with red-painted Egyptians at the oars and Red Sea creatures swimming in the waters beneath





Central Africa had a wall greater than the Great Wall of China that was destroyed who was that civilization get what I am saying.
Central African? Where from Central Africa?

I know about Benin, but that’s West Africa not Central Africa.

Locator-map-Benin.jpg


“Ewuare also rebuilt the capital (present-day Benin City), endowing it with great walls and moats.”


The Great Walls of Benin: 4x Longer Than the Great Wall of China​

“The Walls of Benin are one of Africa's ancient architectural marvels reputed to be longer than the Great Wall of China.

The Great Walls of Benin, also known as the Benin Moats or Iya in local parlance, are a series of massive earthworks encircling Benin City, the capital of the ancient kingdom of Benin, located in modern Nigeria. These moats have deep historical roots, with evidence suggesting their existence before the establishment of the current monarchy.

Construction began just before 800 AD and continued until 1460 AD, involving large-scale manual labour and the repurposing of earth from the inner ditch to build the outer berm. Some traditional sources claim that these earthworks spanned approximately 16,000 kilometres (9,900 mi), enclosing about 6,500 square kilometres (2,500 sq mi) of land, but very little remains today.”

The information is so fragmented.

Not to change the subject but the tribes of Israel is documented and we know where they at :wow: I
What do you mean? Are you high on a substance?

There was never no 12 tribes of Israel. These aren’t real tribes. It's a metaphorical story based on allegories.
 
Last edited:

Ish Gibor

Omnipresence
Joined
Jan 23, 2017
Messages
5,604
Reputation
860
Daps
7,089
Hmmm we do know the first people of Europe were African and had black skin or brown whatever you want to call it.
"Black skin" doesn't mean African necessary, but yeah to some degree there is a connection. 90% of the world population has "dark skin or brown" skin whatever you want to call it.

We need more metrics and variables to make certain claims and determinations. But indeed all ancient specimen had "black skin or brown" whatever you want to call it.

I do think that some of the ancient people in Europe, especially Southern Europe had contact with Africans. Hence HgV88.


Let’s not look at the peopling because they could have came after. Let’s look at the parents of the Greek Roman civilization. The Minoans who from their paintings appear more black than white.

You have to understand and it’s easy to do. If these people didn’t develop where they are form originally but all of a sudden developed when going to a location already populated. They can’t be the creators of that civilization. The further you go back in Greek Roman the blacker it gets. The gods are black so what that tells you.

“Ancient finds in the Western Desert of Egypt at Gebel Ramlah circa 5,000 BC show culture closely linked with indigenous tropical Africans of both the Saharan and sub-Saharan regions, not Europe or the Middle East. Dental studies put the inhabitants of Gebel Ramlah, closest to indigenous tropical African populations.”

(Michal Kobusiewicz, Joel D. Irish et al., Burial practices of the Final Neolithic pastoralists at Gebel Ramlah, Western Desert of Egypt, Gebel Ramlah—a Unique Newborns’ Cemetery of the Neolithic Sahara (2009, 2018))


"When the Elephantine results were added to a broader pooling of the physical characteristics drawn from a wide geographic region which includes Africa, the Mediterranean and the Near East quite strong affinities emerge between Elephantine and populations from Nubia, supporting a strong south-north cline."
[…]
"..sample populations available from northern Egypt from before the 1st Dynasty (Merimda, Maadi and Wadi Digla) turn out to be significantly different from sample populations from early Palestine and Byblos, suggesting a lack of common ancestors over a long time. If there was a south-north cline variation along the Nile valley it did not, from this limited evidence, continue smoothly on into southern Palestine. The limb-length proportions of males from the Egyptian sites group them with Africans rather than with Europeans."

(Barry Kemp - Ancient Egypt: Anatomy of a Civilization. (p. 52, 54-60))



"Ancient Egypt belongs to a language group known as 'Afroasiatic' (formerly called Hamito-Semitic) and its closest relatives are other north-east African languages from Somalia to Chad. Egypt's cultural features, both material and ideological and particularly in the earliest phases, show clear connections with that same broad area. In sum, ancient Egypt was an African culture, developed by African peoples, who had wide ranging contacts in north Africa and western Asia.”
[...] (p. 10)
"The ancient Egyptians were not 'white' in any European sense, nor were they 'Caucasian' [...] we can say that the earliest population of ancient Egypt included African people from the upper Nile, African people from the regions of the Sahara and modern Libya, and smaller numbers of people who had come from south-western Asia and perhaps the Arabian penisula."


(Robert Morkot - The Egyptians: An Introduction. (pp. 12-13))



"The Mahalanobis D2 analysis uncovered close affinities between Nubians and Egyptians. Table 3 lists the Mahalanobis D2 distance matrix. As there is no significance testing that is available to be applied to this form of Mahalanobis distances, the biodistance scores must be interpreted in relation to one another, rather than on a general scale. In some cases, the statistics reveal that the Egyptian samples were more similar to Nubian samples than to other Egyptian samples (e.g. Gizeh and Hesa/Biga) and vice versa (e.g. Badari and Kerma, Naqada and Christian).

These relationships are further depicted in the PCO plot (Fig. 2). Aside from these interpopulation relationships, some Nubian groups are still more similar to other Nubians and some Egyptians are more similar to other Egyptian samples. Moreover, although the Nubian and Egyptian samples formed one well-distributed group, the Egyptian samples clustered in the upper left region, while the Nubians concentrated in the lower right of the plot. One line can be drawn that would separate the closely dispersed Egyptians and Nubians. The predynastic Egyptian samples clustered together (Badari and Naqada), while Gizeh most closely groups with the Lisht sample. The first two principal coordinates from PCO account for 60% of the variation in the samples. The graph from PCO is basically a pictorial representation of the distance matrix and interpretations from the plot mirror the Mahalanobis D2 matrix.”




“The process of the peopling of the Nile Valley likely shaped the population structure and early biological similarity of Egyptians and Nubians. As others have noted, affinity among Nilotic populations was due to an aggregation of events, including environmental, linguistic, and sociopolitical changes over a great deal of time. This study seeks to evaluate the relationships of Nubian and Egyptian groups in the context of the original peopling event. Cranial nonmetric traits from 18 Nubian and Egyptian samples, spanning Lower Egypt to Lower Nubia and approximately 7400 years, were analyzed using Mahalanobis D2 as a measure of biological distance. A principal coordinates analysis and spatial-temporal model were applied to these data. The results reveal temporal and spatial patterning consistent with documented events in Egyptian and Nubian population history. Moreover, the Mesolithic Nubian sample clustered with later Nubian and Egyptian samples, indicating that events prior to the Mesolithic were important in shaping the later genetic patterning of the Nubian population. Later contact through the establishment of the Egyptian fort at Buhen, Kerma’s position as a strategic trade center along the Nile, and Egyptian colonization at Tombos maintained genetic similarity among the populations”





”There is now a sufficient body of evidence from modern studies of skeletal remains to indicate that the ancient Egyptians, especially southern Egyptians, exhibited physical characteristics that are within the range of variation for ancient and modern indigenous peoples of the Sahara and tropical Africa.

In general, the inhabitants of Upper Egypt and Nubia had the greatest biological affinity to people of the Sahara and more southerly areas [...] Any interpretation of the biological affinities of the ancient Egyptians must be placed in the context of hypothesis informed by the archaeological, linguistic, geographic or other data.

In this context the physical anthropological evidence indicates that the early Nile Valley populations can be identified as part of an African lineage, but exhibiting local variation.

This variation represents the short and long term effects of evolutionary forces, such as gene flow, genetic drift, and natural selection influenced by culture and geography"



(Kathryn A. Bard, Egyptians, physical anthropology of Physical anthropology (2015))



"While communities such as Ma'adi appear to have played an important role in entrepots through which goods and ideas form south-west Asia filtered into the Nile Valley in later prehistoric times, the main cultural and political tradition that gave rise to the cultural pattern of Early Dynastic Egypt is to be found not in the north but in the south."

(The Cambridge History of Africa: Volume 1, From the Earliest Times to c. 500 BC, (Cambridge University Press: 1982), Edited by J. Desmond Clark pp. 500-509)

"[...] the early cultures of Merimde, the Fayum, Badari Naqada I and II are essentially African and early African social customs and religious beliefs were the root and foundation of the ancient Egyptian way of life."

(Source: Shaw, Thurston (1976) Changes in African Archaeology in the Last Forty Years in African Studies since 1945. p. 156-68. London.)
 
Last edited:

Ish Gibor

Omnipresence
Joined
Jan 23, 2017
Messages
5,604
Reputation
860
Daps
7,089
According the Egyptian Preist Manetho who was translating content to the Greeks etc.. He stated Egypt goes back 20 thousand years. Egypt as we know it possibly very old the Sphinx and Great Pyramids match the sky during the Age of the Leo around 10k to 12k years ago.

In fragments preserved by later historians (Josephus, Africanus, Eusebius, Syncellus), Manetho described reigns of gods and demigods in Egypt going back over 20,000 years before the reign of Menes, the first human king.

100,000 BC

Map of Egypt showing known Acheulian sites


map1.gif




40,000 BC

Map of Egypt showing known Middle Palaeolithic sites



map2.gif





19,000-10,000 BC

Map of Egypt showing known sites between 19 000 and 10 000 BC


map3.gif





8,000-7,000 BC

Map of Egypt showing known sites between 8000 and 7000 BC



map4.gif






6,500-5,000 BC

Map of Egypt showing known sites between 6500 and 5000 BC



map5.gif





5,000-3,000 BC

Map of Egypt showing important Neolithic sites between 5th and 4th Millennia BC



map6.gif





“The results indicate a strong association between some of the sub-Saharan Middle Stone Age (MSA) specimens, and the Nazlet Khater mandible.”




Chronology of Ancient Egypt

Paleolithic

Lower Paleolithic, circa 700/500,000–200,000 BP
Middle Paleolithic, circa 200,000–45,000 BP

Upper Paleolithic, circa 35,000–21,000 BP

Late Paleolithic, circa 21,000–12,000 BP
Epi-paleolithic, circa 12,000–8,000 BP

Neolithic, northern Egypt: begins circa 5200 BC

Predynastic period:

Ma’adi culture, northern Egypt, circa 4000–3300/3200 BC
Badarian culture, Middle Egypt, circa 4500–3800 BC

Nagada culture, southern Egypt:

Nagada I, circa 4000–3600 BC
Nagada II, circa 3600–3200 BC
Nagada III/Dynasty 0, circa 3200–3050 BC


 
Last edited:

Ish Gibor

Omnipresence
Joined
Jan 23, 2017
Messages
5,604
Reputation
860
Daps
7,089
According the Egyptian Preist Manetho who was translating content to the Greeks etc.. He stated Egypt goes back 20 thousand years. Egypt as we know it possibly very old the Sphinx and Great Pyramids match the sky during the Age of the Leo around 10k to 12k years ago.

In fragments preserved by later historians (Josephus, Africanus, Eusebius, Syncellus), Manetho described reigns of gods and demigods in Egypt going back over 20,000 years before the reign of Menes, the first human king.

Early Dynastic period:

1st Dynasty, circa 3050–2890 BC:
Djer
Djet
Den
Anedjib
Smerkhet
Qa’a

2nd Dynasty, circa 2890–2686 BC:

Hotepsekhemwy
Reneb
Nynetjer
Weneg
Peribsen
Khasekhemwy

Old Kingdom:

3rd Dynasty, circa 2686–2613 BC:

Nebka
Zoser
Sekhemkhet
Khaba
Huni

4th Dynasty, circa 2613–2494 BC:

Seneferu
Khufu
Djedefre
Khafre
Nebka
Menkaure
Shepseskaf

5th Dynasty, circa 2494–2345 BC:

Weserkaf
Sahure
Neferirkare
Shepseskare
Neferefre
Nyuserre
Menkauhor
Djedkare-Isesi
Unas

6th Dynasty, circa 2345–2181 BC:

Teti
Weserkare
Pepi I
Merenre
Pepi II
Nitocris

First Intermediate Period:

7th-8th Dynasties, circa 2181–2125 BC:

circa 16 kings

9th-10th Dynasties (Heracleopolis), circa 2160–2025 BC:

circa 18 kings


 
Last edited:

Ish Gibor

Omnipresence
Joined
Jan 23, 2017
Messages
5,604
Reputation
860
Daps
7,089
According the Egyptian Preist Manetho who was translating content to the Greeks etc.. He stated Egypt goes back 20 thousand years. Egypt as we know it possibly very old the Sphinx and Great Pyramids match the sky during the Age of the Leo around 10k to 12k years ago.

In fragments preserved by later historians (Josephus, Africanus, Eusebius, Syncellus), Manetho described reigns of gods and demigods in Egypt going back over 20,000 years before the reign of Menes, the first human king.
11th Dynasty, pre-unification Thebes, circa 2125–2055 BC:

Mentuhotep I Intef II
Intef I Intef III

Middle Kingdom:

11th Dynasty, unification, circa 2055–1985 BC:

Mentuhotep II Mentuhotep IV
Mentuhotep III

12th Dynasty, circa 1985–1795 BC:

Amenemhat I Amenemhat III
Senusret I Amenemhat IV
Amenemhat II Queen Sobekneferu
Senusret II

Second Intermediate Period:

13th Dynasty, circa 1795–1650 BC:

circa 65 kings, including: Sihathor I
‘Amu-sa-hornedjherjotef Sihathor II
Chendjer Sobekhotep IV
Sobekhotep III Neferhotep III
Neferhotep I

14th Dynasty, circa 1750–1650 BC:

Possibly up to 76 kings who ruled from Sais in the Delta and overlapped with the 13th
and 15th Dynasties.

15th Dynasty (Hyksos), circa 1650–1550 BC:

Salitis Apophis
Khayan Khamudi

16th Dynasty (Hyksos), circa 1650–1550 BC:

circa 17 minor kings/Hyksos vassals who overlapped with the 15th Dynasty.
17th Dynasty (Thebes), circa 1650–1550 BC:
circa 14 kings, the last four of which were: Ta’o II
Intef VI Kamose
Ta’o I

New Kingdom:

18th Dynasty, circa 1550–1295 BC:

Ahmose Tuthmose IV
Amenhotep I Amenhotep III
Tuthmose I Amenhotep IV/Akhenaten (Amarna period)
Tuthmose II Smenkhkare
Tuthmose III Tutankhamen
Hatshepsut Ay
Amenhotep II Horemheb
Ramesside period:
19th Dynasty, circa 1295–1186 BC:
Ramesses I Amenmesses
Seti I Seti II
Ramesses II Siptah
Merenptah Queen Tawosret

20th Dynasty, circa 1186–1069 BC:

Sethnakht
Ramesses III
Ramesses IV
Ramesses V
Ramesses VI
Ramesses VII
Ramesses VIII
Ramesses IX
Ramesses X
Ramesses XI

Third Intermediate Period:

21st Dynasty (Tanis), circa 1069–945 BC:

Smendes
Amenemnisu
Psusennes I
Amenemope
Osorkon the Elder
Siamen
Psusennes II
22nd Dynasty (Libyan), circa 945–735 BC:
Sheshonk I
Osorkon I
Sheshonk II
Takelot I
Osorkon II
Takelot II
Sheshonk III
Pami
Sheshonk V

Theban kings, circa 818–730 BC:

Pedubast I
Input I
Sheshonk IV(?)
Osorkon III
Takelot III
Rudamen
Iny

23rd Dynasty (Libyan), circa 735–710 BC:

Pedubast II
Osorkon IV
Psammous

Local dynasties, circa 730 BC:

Thotemhat and Nimlot (Hermopolis)
Peftjauawybast (Heracleopolis)
Input II (Leontopolis)
24th Dynasty, circa 727–715 BC:
Tefnakht
Bakenrenef

25th Dynasty (Kushyte), circa 760–653 BC:

Kashta
Piye
Shabako
Shebitku
Taharka
Tanutameni

Late period:

26th Dynasty (Saite), circa 664–525 BC:

Neko I
Psamtik I
Neko II
Psamtik II
Apries
Amasis
Psamtik III

27th Dynasty (Persian), circa 525–404 BC:

Cambyses
Darius I
Xerxes I
Artaxerxes I
Darius II
Artaxerxes II

28th Dynasty, circa 404–399 BC:

Amyrtaeus

29th Dynasty, circa 399–380 BC:

Nepherites I
Hakor
Nepherites II

30th Dynasty, circa 380–343 BC:

Nectanebo I
Teos
Nectanebo II

31st Dynasty (Persian), circa 343–332 BC:

Artaxerxes III
Arses
Darius III

Ptolemaic period, circa 332–32 BC:

Macedonians:

Alexander the Great
Philip Arrhidaeus
Alexander IV

Ptolemaic Dynasty:

Ptolemy I Soter I
Ptolemy II Philadelphus
Ptolemy III Evergetes
Ptolemy IV Philopator
Ptolemy V Epiphanes
Ptolemy VI Philometor
Ptolemy VII Neos Philopator
Ptolemy VIII Evergetes II
Ptolemy IX Soter II
Ptolemy X Alexander I
Ptolemy IX Soter II (again)
Ptolemy XI Alexander II
Ptolemy XII Neos Dionysos
Cleopatra VII Philopator
Ptolemy XIII
Ptolemy XIV Caesarion
Roman period

Begins after the defeat of Cleopatra VII and Mark Antony at the Battle of
Actium in 31 BC, when Egypt became a Roman province.
Coptic period

From the defeat of the Roman emperor Maxentius by Constantine I in AD 312,
when Christian persercution ended in the Roman empire, to the Arab invasion
of Egypt in AD 639.

 

Dzali OG

Dz Ali OG...Pay me like you owe me!
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
15,883
Reputation
2,982
Daps
43,795
Reppin
Duval Florida
I can't listen to black people who are still "white hurt". Ya know the brother who was taught by early conscious community that "it's our duty to disagree with anything the white man says".

If cacs conclude water is wet the hotep brother will say "My brother, my sister, my mother goddess of the earth...you know we can't listen to the lies of the wite devil...all they do is lie. If they say water is wet, well it must be dry" smh. Just making themselves look completely stupid.

And this is where many of our people are at. As evident in some posts in this thread. Making themselves look goofy dumb.
 

Ish Gibor

Omnipresence
Joined
Jan 23, 2017
Messages
5,604
Reputation
860
Daps
7,089
I can't listen to black people who are still "white hurt". Ya know the brother who was taught by early conscious community that "it's our duty to disagree with anything the white man says".

If cacs conclude water is wet the hotep brother will say "My brother, my sister, my mother goddess of the earth...you know we can't listen to the lies of the wite devil...all they do is lie. If they say water is wet, well it must be dry" smh. Just making themselves look completely stupid.

And this is where many of our people are at. As evident in some posts in this thread. Making themselves look goofy dumb.
It would be one thing to disagree, but the dispute has to be grounded with facts. And that is where a lot lack integrity. They just say anything that seems to make sense, but in reality is not. And this goes for all extremist, from non-Black communities as well. They love to flip flop the facts without being objective.

These folks will claim that these are the Moors (in this picture below), while the word Moor all throughout Europe meant dark skinned / Black. And at the same time they will tell us that these are the people who actually inhabited ancient Egypt and that they are the people who stem from Phoenicians, Natufians and Nuerat Man. It doesn't make sense.



Alhambra-Main_hall.jpg







blacktudors_trans_NvBQzQNjv4Bq1UEfOBrhlcXMt83YVMQJhdFcjf1bEuvIdM4vjmaM228.jpg







"Nuwayrat individual is predicted to have had brown eyes, brown hair and skin pigmentation ranging from dark to black skin, with a lower probability of intermediate skin colour (Methods and Supplementary Table 10)."

“The mitochondrial DNA (haplogroup I/N1a1b2) and chromosome Y (haplogroup E1b1b1b2b~) haplogroups of the Nuwayrat individual are most common in present-day North African and West Asian groups (Supplementary Table 4), consistent with the whole-genome affinities.”

(Adeline Morez Jacobs, Joel D. Irish et al., Whole-genome ancestry of an Old Kingdom Egyptian)




“This involved comparing historically documented Phoenician sites with neighboring non-Phoenician sites for the identification of weak but systematic signatures shared by the Phoenician sites that could not readily be explained by chance or by other expansions.

From these comparisons, we found that haplogroup J2, in general, and six Y-STR haplotypes, in particular, exhibited a Phoenician signature that contributed > 6% to the modern Phoenician-influenced populations examined.

Our methodology can be applied to any historically documented expansion in which contact and noncontact sites can be identified […]

PCS3+ scores strongly as a Phoenician-colonization candidate and is strongly associated with the SNP haplogroup E3b, but it does not show the wide geographic coverage that the other PCS+S demonstrate. It represents the strongest of the lower-coverage STR+S. [...]

Both PCS1+ and PCS2+ contain multiple haplogroups, primarily J2 but including J*(xJ2) and E3b, with PCS1+ containing the greatest diversity. [...]

The Phoenicians were a distinctive and independent civilization that dominated the Mediterranean Sea during the first millennium BCE, emerging from a coastal section of the Eastern Mediterranean, including the four main Bronze Age maritime cities of Tyre, Sidon, Byblos, and Arwad and located in the modern countries of Lebanon and southern Syria."



(P. A. Zalloua et al., Identifying genetic traces of historical expansions: Phoenician footprints in the Mediterranean, Am. J. Hum. Genet., 83(5):633-642, 2008 DOI)


Q5gxRfph.png


The presence of African individuals in Punic populations from the Island of Ibiza (Spain): contributions from physical anthropology


1-s2.0-S0002929708005922-gr1.jpg



1-s2.0-S0002929708005922-gr2.jpg


 
Last edited:

Ish Gibor

Omnipresence
Joined
Jan 23, 2017
Messages
5,604
Reputation
860
Daps
7,089
It’s a coping mechanism and grifters know how to exploit it.


I have no "twitter", but looking at that channel. It's batshyt crazy. Nevertheless, interesting but also a concerning development.









As for the man in the original post. There are Asian lions, which are different from African lions. This is what happens when one is not officially trained in zoology, or Africana studies or that matter. He most likely has no degree at all, like most of these grifters.

 
Last edited:
Top