the funny thing about these illmatic & reasonable doubt threads is that the same people that try to deny their status, are the same people that wont utter a world when an album like black moon's "enta da stage" is considered a classic(as it should be).
they just like to stress sales and such for jay & nas, I guess because they had big commercial success afterwards.
2 things for certain about reasonable doubt if jay never became a household name afterwards:
1.) nobody on these message boards would try to downplay its classic status.
2.) at the same time, one thing we can all agree on is that the media would prolly sweep reasonable doubt under the rug and not mention it anywhere near as much as they do. a lot of these commercial entities that give the album high rank wouldn't even know about the album, nor would they know about jay. so in that case, @Enchanted, yes the album does benefit from jay blowing up later and campaigning for it. it helps in that aspect.
but if you were into hip-hop for real-for real back then, you know reasonable doubt is a classic. also, some of these bigger name artists that keep getting mentioned in here, weren't getting as much props as jay within hip-hop. for example, the fugees dropped a great album and they were selling more records than everybody. but jay was getting more burn in the streets of the fugees own city/state than they were.
I dunno fam. I don't think it would be considered the "classic" it is today if Jay didn't become who he is. It would have just been another dope debut in the same breath as Busta's "The Coming".
There are many albums though that do become classic even though it wasn't recognized as such when it dropped. But to say RD was poppin "like that" in 96 isn't true.