Older thread '20 NYK Off-season Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

seemorecizzy

Superstar
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
16,848
Reputation
2,642
Daps
54,935
Reppin
NULL
I don't get it. The tweet doesnt really indicate he is a scout.
blatt was hired because him and mills went to college together. nothing more, nothing less.

plus mills and perry have probably ran out of things to talk about during their dolan visa funded lunches. blatt will spice up the conversations
 

storyteller

Veteran
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
17,946
Reputation
6,056
Daps
68,132
Reppin
NYC
I don't get it. The tweet doesnt really indicate he is a scout.

It's more than scouting, but the description of here mentions scouting



"David Blatt is a great basketball mind and we look forward to adding him to the organization," Mills and Knicks general manager Scott Perry said in a statement released by the team. "He will be a great asset to our front office, G League team and international scouting."

And just to color this in with some speculation. Having someone that connected with European leagues and teams will mean better access to information about players. The same way a well connected guy like Perry can reach out to people within a bunch of organizations, Blatt could help with looking into foreign talent...I hope. Just to swing in the big conversation piece of the past couple of weeks, Mike Miller got to the Knicks off a referral. Someone told Allan Houston to give him a look and at minimum, hiring Miller to the G-league squad was a big success. My hope here is that Blatt can do the same with Euro-players that are under the radar.
 

seemorecizzy

Superstar
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
16,848
Reputation
2,642
Daps
54,935
Reppin
NULL
It's more than scouting, but the description of here mentions scouting





And just to color this in with some speculation. Having someone that connected with European leagues and teams will mean better access to information about players. The same way a well connected guy like Perry can reach out to people within a bunch of organizations, Blatt could help with looking into foreign talent...I hope. Just to swing in the big conversation piece of the past couple of weeks, Mike Miller got to the Knicks off a referral. Someone told Allan Houston to give him a look and at minimum, hiring Miller to the G-league squad was a big success. My hope here is that Blatt can do the same with Euro-players that are under the radar.

:laff:
you're optimism off in the charts.
stop acting like you're a new fan.
you know what this is
 

Knicksman20

Superstar
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
18,376
Reputation
6,078
Daps
52,045
Reppin
NY


Not the return I'd have in mind, but it does stand as a potential upgrade if that's the direction they want to go. I'd pair that with moving Morris or Randle so we can slide Frank to a 2 guard role next to Teague/Payton and Barrett to the 3.


He's a little older now but I've wanted to see him in a Knicks jersey for the past 6 years. He wanted to be a Knick from what I remember
 

BAMBA

The Menace
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
4,780
Reputation
1,370
Daps
18,039
Yo, where the fukk are all the trades we were waiting for?

I hope the front office ain’t falling for the okie doke...didn’t I say trade everyone?

Free rep for the first person to quote this and post my trademark gif...
 

JMurder

SOHH Member since 01...
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
13,630
Reputation
1,110
Daps
20,411
Reppin
Bronx, NYC
The Dallas Palace of Analysis: Mike Miller’s defense
Since Mike Miller has taken over as coach, the Knicks have greatly simplified their defensive scheme. When Fizdale was coach, the Knicks used a variety of coverages EVERY game — they’d trap/drop/switch/play different zones/etc. — and rarely used the same primary coverage two games in a row. These days, the Knicks are exclusively playing drop coverage. The benefits are immense.

The value of simplicity
NBA offenses are varied. Teams have different strengths, different schemes, and different focuses. As a result, there’s a temptation for coaches to adjust their defenses to better match up with opposing offenses. For example, one might want to hedge or trap screens against Damian Lillard and the Blazers because of his ability to pull threes off the bounce, and play softer drop coverages against a team like the Knicks. In some cases, varying one’s defensive scheme works to great effect. For example, the Raptors have used just about every conceivable (and maybe some inconceivable) defensive scheme this season, and they’ve ridden that variety to the second-best defensive rating in the NBA.

Two factors have allowed the Raptors to reach this point: (1) they started very simply (last season), and slowly but surely added new wrinkles and new schemes and (2) they have a collection of incredibly smart, experienced, hard-working and talented defenders. Here’s Nick Nurse discussing how they started simple and built towards something more complicated.



One thing that you’ll immediately notice about the Knicks under Fizdale — neither factor (1) or (2) was true of them.



Most importantly, (1) was false. The Knicks started this season with seven new rotation players — Morris, Barrett, Randle, Payton, Ellington, Gibson and Portis — and a bunch of guys who were new to the NBA — Barrett, Knox, Ntilikina, Robinson, and Trier. Fizdale threw defensive schemes at them like they were Marc Gasol, Serge Ibaka, Pascal Siakam, Kyle Lowry, Fred VanVleeet, and OG Anunoby.

There are a number of reasons why this is bad. First, the Knicks didn’t master any of the schemes they used. Instead of being good at one scheme, they were bad at many.

Second, changing schemes resulted in confusion. Often times players were unsure what rotations they were supposed to make, and we saw way too many plays like this one where Randle and Morris chased the same guy, and Frank is left to guard two players by himself.

(Click Here to Keep Reading


A Defensive 180

A Defensive 180
The Knicks defense has flipped the script under Mike Miller
5 hr
Happy Friday everyone!

As we inch ever so close to Christmas, it also feels like we’re at a critical juncture of the Knicks’ season (actually, has there been a non-critical juncture of this season?)

The December 15 starting gun on trade season has sounded, and the moves many hoped New York would make as soon as the bell rang never came. Now, as the New Year draws closer, it’s unclear whether the Knicks will be buyers or sellers.

Well, that’s not quite true…everyone figures that they will eventually be sellers, simply because February 6 is late enough in the season that New York will almost certainly be out of it by then. In the meantime, there are jobs on the line, and seven weeks is a long time.

But it can get late early in this league, as David Fizdale recently found out. Between now and Januray 1st, the Knicks will play a few games in which they’re supposed to get soundly beaten (tonight in Miami, tomorrow vs the Bucks), and then three winnable affairs (home and away games against the Wizards sandwiched around a “road” game in Brooklyn). If they can find a way to win more than they lose over this stretch, we might really have to start talking about things a little differently when the calander flips to 2020.

Is that possible? The early indications are a definite “maybe.” Six games isn’t enough to draw any sweeping conclusions, but it has been enough of a sample size to notice some very distinct changes under new head coach Mike Miller.

To this end, Posting and Toasting’s Dallas Amico put together an excellent, video-heavy examination of the Knicks defensive adjustments under Miller which you should absolutely check out. It examines how the Knicks are playing a simpler, safer scheme that fits much better with their personnel. If you don’t believe your eyes, then let’s check out some numbers.

How about we start here: over the last six games, the Knicks have given up the fourth best location effective field goal percentage in the league according to Cleaning the Glass. That means if they’d given up the league average field goal percentage from each spot on the court, they’d be a top-five defense, at least by eFG% allowed. Under Fiz, New York was 28th in the same stat.

If this feels like a BS thing to point to, take solace in the fact that the top five teams in location eFG% on the year rank fourth (Philly), 12th (Orlando), first (Milwaukee), ninth (Utah) and 14th (Brooklyn) in overall defense. Any statistic that has the Knicks alongside those five defenses in anything whatsoever is good.

It also doesn’t mean they’re suddenly the 96 Bulls. Six games into the Miller era and New York is still 23rd in defensive efficiency, giving up 111.5 points per 100 possessions (Under Fizdale, they were giving up 113.0 and ranked 24th). The signs are there, however, that things could improve even more.

We constantly heard Fiz talk about guarding the paint, and even heard him cite statistics about how their paint defense was among the best in the league. This was true…except “paint defense” is very different from “rim defense.” Under Fiz, the Knicks still allowed opponents to take a whopping 36.9 percent of their attempts at the rim, which ranked 21st in the NBA.

Under Miller, this number has dropped all the way to 28.7 percent, which is third best in the league over that span, behind only the Bucks (who have perfected the art of protecting the rim) and Brooklyn.

Of course, shots at the rim are only one of the three most efficient shots in basketball, the other two being corner threes and free throws. If you’re borrowing from Peter to pay Paul and giving up tons of looks from the corner, or fouling guys before that can even get to the rim, all of the above numbers are meaningless.

Except the exact opposite has happened. Under Miller, the Knicks have given up the ninth lowest frequency of corner three looks (clocking in at 7.0 percent) and the third lowest free throw rate (14.1 percent) in the game. It’s a small sample size, but New York is the only team in the NBA in the top 10 in all three defensive categories (rim frequency, corner-3 frequency and free throw rate) since December 6. That’s not bad.

Under Fiz, the Knicks gave up the sixth highest frequency of corner threes, and were 27th in defensive free throw rate. Basically, teams were playing the Fizdale Knicks with the same mentality Augustus Gloop had when he walked into the chocolate factory…You get candy! Now you get candy! Candy for everyone!!!

Of course these shiny new numbers need to be taken with a grain of salt. Of New York’s last six opponents, only two (Portland, 10th, and Indiana, 13th) rank in the top half of the league in offense, and Golden State and Atlanta are both train wrecks.

But considering where they were coming from, any signs of progress, even faint ones, are well worth taking.

Now let’s see how they do against the big boys. To Miami we go.

(Click Here to Read More...)

Things to hope continues moving forward
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top