One reason hip hop is falling off

[Yagirlcheatinonus]

From a production standpoint everything has been sampled

 

[Kitsch]

From a production standpoint everything has been sampled

 

[Nostalgic]

 

[MikeyC]

Total opposite breh.

During the 90's, sampling laws became a lot more tighter, transforming the hip hop producing landscape, which, in turn, forced producers to be more creative with their beat making.

 

[Fresh]

Total opposite breh.

During the 90's, sampling laws became a lot more tighter, transforming the hip hop producing landscape, which, in turn, forced producers to be more creative with their beat making.

this ... and beats with samples went hard too. I think production made with dope samples and beats made from scratch could've co-existed till this day just fine. Think it would be ill for rap fans.

 

[NVious]

Madlib and Alchemist would like a word with you.

 

[Big Woadie]

From a production standpoint everything has been sampled

 

[Yagirlcheatinonus]

thats why alot of songs gets used more than once

 

[Yagirlcheatinonus]

Total opposite breh.

During the 90's, sampling laws became a lot more tighter, transforming the hip hop producing landscape, which, in turn, forced producers to be more creative with their beat making.

Thats to give credit to the artist being sampled but how many times do one producer chop it his way and another his way.

 

[The_King_of_Everything]

HIPHOP FANS ARE RUINING HIPHOP BECAUSE THEY STARTED ACTING LIKE fakkitS WORRYING ABOUT shyt THAT DONT HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH THE QUALITY OF THE MUSIC.

 

[Yagirlcheatinonus]

Madlib and Alchemist would like a word with you.

I rock with their music but a lot of times they sample shyt thats been used redundancy

 

[Yagirlcheatinonus]

put it this way instead of selling you beats they sell you equipment to make your own because its oversaturated

 

[NVious]

I rock with their music but a lot of times they sample shyt thats been used redundancy

Say word? Madlib's crates are mega deep. Give me an example of that...not saying you're wrong, but even if I can ID the sample, I usually can't say it's been 'used redundancy'.