PACKERS Are Going To DESTORY Seahawks

FAH1223

Go Wizards, Go Terps, Go Packers!
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
80,756
Reputation
10,039
Daps
238,431
Reppin
WASHINGTON, DC
packers are not a running team from the groundup.

They can be. If they just commit.

No one's talking about GB's offensive line handling the two best lines on football in DET and BUF on the ground.

It's light years from Week one

Lacy is also fresher than Murray who is a bit worn out


packers dont have much of chance against seahawks
cowgirls prolly matchup the best to win against seattle out of any remaining teams. all other teams rely heavily on passing the ball

Cowboys have a worse defense than GB

Abd SEA will blowout either team in a rematch

The NFL wants that DAL vs SEA matchup so bad. They gassing this shid up.
 

yseJ

Empire strikes back
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
47,882
Reputation
2,949
Daps
70,832
Reppin
The Yay
Cowboys have a worse defense than GB

Abd SEA will blowout either team in a rematch

The NFL wants that DAL vs SEA matchup so bad. They gassing this shid up.
you have to run the ball, a lot, patiently to win against seattle. thus dallas and carolina were best bets, because they are run-heavy team that could and did run.

dont take me wrong, I never root for dallas and I never will, I just dont see a team that is heavily reliant on pass game and qb beating seattle in playoffs.
 

Bboystyle

FIRE MATT LAFLEUR
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
49,193
Reputation
6,345
Daps
82,765
Reppin
So. Cal
what does what mean ?
you dont understand what a run-first team is ? why are you playing dumb ? I know you aint stupid breh


i meant it as in wtf does that have to do with beating seattle? We proven we can run on good front 7's,so just ebcause we arent a run first team doesnt mean we cant beat them on the ground.
 

FAH1223

Go Wizards, Go Terps, Go Packers!
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
80,756
Reputation
10,039
Daps
238,431
Reppin
WASHINGTON, DC
you have to run the ball, a lot, patiently to win against seattle. thus dallas and carolina were best bets, because they are run-heavy team that could and did run.

dont take me wrong, I never root for dallas and I never will, I just dont see a team that is heavily reliant on pass game and qb beating seattle in playoffs.

DAL has the weapons to give em problems but with the defense they have vs the pass, Russ will exploit those matchups

And DAL front seven is banged up. They were good vs the run but I just don't see them stopping Lynch at all or containing Russ in the pocket

As far as the Packer defense. GB has great depth in the secondary to matchup with SEA's receivers. GB has a good pass rush too.

The issue is the middle. Clay helps a ton but the lack of a NT would hurt with Lynch.

And can the Pack keep Russ in the pocket? We have trouble with Kaep but did a good job on Cam earlier this year but he lacked weapons.

Either way SEA is getting that ring. Unless some fukkery happens
 

yseJ

Empire strikes back
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
47,882
Reputation
2,949
Daps
70,832
Reppin
The Yay
i meant it as in wtf does that have to do with beating seattle? We proven we can run on good front 7's,so just ebcause we arent a run first team doesnt mean we cant beat them on the ground.
you have to be extremely committed to the run to beat seattle. even if it aint working, you stick to it.

most teams with a very good passing game dont stay committed to the run if its not working.
this is exactly what happened in the green bay seattle opener to start the season- count the carries your RBs got in second half and count the amount of passing attempts yall had. I guarantee it was at least the double of pass attempts to run attempts
 

philmonroe

Superstar
Joined
Jun 19, 2012
Messages
28,909
Reputation
730
Daps
37,473
Reppin
The 215
I was being facetious, but round 2 really will be much different from the Seahawks point of view.

The defense y'all played was using an injured Kam Chancellor, no Bobby Wagner, and no Byron Maxwell.

Also, this was back when we had Percy Harvin still, us forcing the ball to him too frequently made us one dimensional, we are obviously better on O without him.

People are really underestimating the effect that team meeting had after the Chiefs game, since then we've gone undefeated and you can see the increase in swagger and confidence from today compared to the Cowboys or Rams game.

Looking forward to a good game, that is unless you can't make it.:skip:
We make we'll see cause all this bullshyt about team meeting and the like mean nothing. Y'all still avg on O period. The D carries y'all and ain't nothing wrong with it but don't sell me these dudes some offensive powerhouse. I'm not buying that bullshyt. Well its been awhile since both teams lost so that don't mean shyt either so like I said if we make it we'll see. If not fukk it hope y'all destroy GB
 

FAH1223

Go Wizards, Go Terps, Go Packers!
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
80,756
Reputation
10,039
Daps
238,431
Reppin
WASHINGTON, DC
you have to be extremely committed to the run to beat seattle. even if it aint working, you stick to it.

most teams with a very good passing game dont stay committed to the run if its not working.
this is exactly what happened in the green bay seattle opener to start the season- count the carries your RBs got in second half and count the amount of passing attempts yall had. I guarantee it was at least the double of pass attempts to run attempts

Bulaga got injured in Week 1

Changed the complexity of the game since depth at Tackle is weak for GB due to injuries to backups
 

SubZeroDegrees

50 shots in the blender.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
36,654
Reputation
4,003
Daps
81,336
Reppin
Nawlins
hawks haven't played a legit team since week 6

>soft ass schedule
>great defense
>overrated team

tumblr_nfo366wfLO1qj0xqqo1_400.jpg

:ehh:

Agreed, Seahawks are done.
 
Top