Papa John's :mjpls

[the next guy]

sad

 

[DallasTxRep]

Pizza fell off about 7 years ago

People look at me crazy when I say this....shyt been nasty for years. Whataburger is starting to fall off too IMO

 

[Maxine Shaw]

It's not the best but them discount codes have kept me fed on several occasions.

50% off when I was working at my school district. And it tasted like it, too.

 

[Sir Charles Barkley]

In saying “Colonel Sanders didnt get backlash for saying it” what is the end game in his comment other than wanting the same type of non backlash reaction?

U don’t understand the difference between calling someone a racial slur and using that racial slur in a sentence in a wholly contextual manner?


If someone got up on stage and said “it’s not right to call a Spanish person spic”... you would see that as an indictment on that person’s racism towards Spanish people?

Pleas tell me you aren’t this dense.

 

[NYC Rebel]

U don’t understand the difference between calling someone a racial slur and using that racial slur in a sentence in a wholly contextual manner?


If someone got up on stage and said “it’s not right to call a Spanish person spic”... you would see that as an indictment on that person’s racism towards Spanish people?

Pleas tell me you aren’t this dense.

This was about the USE of a racial slur (by Saunders) and a preferred outcome (no rebuke).
Nothing in your response tied itself to Saunders abuse of the word.

AGAIN....he said Saunders used the word and did not face rebuke. Exactly what was his end game here? And you got the nerve to call someone dense?

 

[El Poyo Loco]

This was about the USE of a racial slur (by Saunders) and a preferred outcome (no rebuke).
Nothing in your response tied itself to Saunders abuse of the word.

AGAIN....he said Saunders used the word and did not face rebuke. Exactly what was his end game here? And you got the nerve to call someone dense?

Not only this but what was the purpose of telling everyone in that conference call about blacks being dragged to death by trucks

 

[Sir Charles Barkley]

This was about the USE of a racial slur (by Saunders) and a preferred outcome (no rebuke).
Nothing in your response tied itself to Saunders abuse of the word.

AGAIN....he said Saunders used the word and did not face rebuke. Exactly what was his end game here? And you got the nerve to call someone dense?

he's highlighting how ridiculous this selective outrage has been

if someone is agitated enough by what pizza man said, then CERTAINLY kfc should have been a wrap years ago right? assuming these allegations are correct?

 

[Axolotl]

U don’t understand the difference between calling someone a racial slur and using that racial slur in a sentence in a wholly contextual manner?


If someone got up on stage and said “it’s not right to call a Spanish person spic”... you would see that as an indictment on that person’s racism towards Spanish people?

Pleas tell me you aren’t this dense.

 

[Sir Charles Barkley]

actually that's you tapdancing... getting upset at all the things they want you to be upset over.

"don't look over here while we destroy the black family and remove fathers from the home by incentivizing single motherhood... don't look over here while we take all the tax money and leave the poor black neighborhoods and schools to rot...

... but look here! pizza man said nikka during a PR conference call. be upset! be outraged! THIS MAN is our enemy!"

he wasn't denying black people jobs, wasn't denying black people service... shyt he probably employs several thousand black people. but nah... there u go.

 

[NYC Rebel]

he's highlighting how ridiculous this selective outrage has been

First, Saunders said that at a time before social media and other platforms where it could be broadly broadcast (honestly, while not surpirsed, this is the first im hearing of it).

Second, as a result of “selective outrage” you agree that it should be let go like him, right? :baker:

Ol “t-t-t-this is selective outrage with the use of the word!! So you should let this go!!” Ass niqqa

 

[Sir Charles Barkley]

First, Saunders said that at a time before social media and other platforms where it could be broadly broadcast (honestly, while not surpirsed, this is the first im hearing of it).


ok now that you know are you gonna continue to patronize KFC and continue to make richer the privileged heirs of a bonafide racist? a company who's founder (and symbol) used racial slurs directly towards black people?

Second, as a result of “selective outrage” you agree that it should be let go like him, right? :baker:

Ol “t-t-t-this is selective outrage with the use of the word!! So you should let this go!!” Ass niqqa

except he wasn't being accused of using a slur, it was in response to his comments to the anthem and the effect it had on his sales as a sponsor of the nfl.

the slur was used in context, so me being an intelligent adult that can understand the difference... am not offended.

 

[NYC Rebel]

Who cares what hes accused of. Before you tried to give him a pass, I asked you whats the end game of him bringing up Saunders use of the word other than to exonerate himself or others? Why cant you fill that blank? And you have the nerve to call me dense when for the fourth time, you refuse to address what im asking.

 

[Sir Charles Barkley]

Who cares what hes accused of. Before you tried to give him a pass, I asked you whats the end game of him bringing up Saunders use of the word other than to exonerate himself or others? Why cant you fill that blank? And you have the nerve to call me dense when for the fourth time, you refuse to address what im asking.

there is no other reason, he IS trying to exonerate himself. what other reason would there be?

he's pointing out the distinction between actual racism and what passes for modern day racism like this bullshyt here. and yet here YOU are trying to lump it all together.

if everyone would just use common sense he wouldn't have had to point this out.

 

[NYC Rebel]

there is no other reason, he IS trying to exonerate himself. what other reason would there be?

he's pointing out the distinction between actual racism and what passes for modern day racism like this bullshyt here. and yet here YOU are trying to lump it all together.

if everyone would just use common sense he wouldn't have had to point this out.

Hold up....NOTHING in his commentary even ties itself to “actual racism.” He brought up no contrast other than there being less outrage (at a time when comments like Saunders wasnt even broadcast news). YOU added that actual racism angle. He said that comment no different than Mark Cuban in trying to defend Donald Sterling say that “we are all prejudiced” in giving him a pass. He tried to give himself a pass point blank and here you are to find fault in OUR disgust of it moreso than his actions.

Why do niqqas like you exist if not here to find excuses for bigots?

 

[Sir Charles Barkley]

Hold up....NOTHING in his commentary even ties itself to “actual racism.” He brought up no contrast other than there being less outrage (at a time when comments like Saunders wasnt even broadcast news). YOU added that actual racism angle. He said that comment no different than Mark Cuban in trying to defend Donald Sterling say that “we are all prejudiced” in giving him a pass. He tried to give himself a pass point blank and here you are to find fault in OUR disgust of it moreso than his actions.

Why do niqqas like you exist if not here to find excuses for bigots?

give himself a pass for what...?