Paris Shootings - 12 Confirmed Dead

[RoMans]

Europeans have done worst :blackye:

Columbus was a slave trader known for the selling of young native girls into sexual slavery.

Michele de Cuneo, one of his best friends, writing proudly about raping a woman given to him by Columbus in a letter to a friend:



Yet he has his own day in this country like he's some fukking hero. Miss me with that boy. It's only a problem when white people start dying.

You are comparing the 1400's to 2015?? Its not valid. It doesn't make it less worse. But that was when society wasn't as 'civilized' as now. So why support a group now because Europeans were as barbaric in 1400's??

 

[Chris.B]

They are clearly linked to ISIS. Same groups that is fighting the militaries of Iraq, iran, Syria, and the US.
Your clueless dude. What's a police station compared to all the military bases they've overrun??

ISIS is chicken. They only moved into Iraq after America left those cities.

Everybody knows it. The US needs one fighter jet to send them fukkboys to paradise to marry their virgins

 

[Canon]

You are comparing the 1400's to 2015?? Its not valid. It doesn't make it less worse. But that was when society wasn't as 'civilized' as now. So why support a group now because Europeans were as barbaric in 1400's??

they still trafficking underage chicks so.....

 

[606onit]

THE news from Paris today has been grim. Gunmen killed, at the current count, ten staff members of Charlie Hebdo, a French satirical weekly, as well as two policemen.

The obvious cause of the rampage is Charlie Hebdo’s habit of satirising Islam. It had eagerly joined a debate that has roiled Europe for almost a decade. In 2005 a Danish newspaper, Jyllands Posten, published 12 cartoons of the prophet Muhammad. Some of them were offensive. (Most were not.) But the Danish paper intended to provoke a debate about self-censorship in Europe. It succeeded; Danish institutions in the Middle East were set on fire and one of the cartoonists, who had depicted Muhammad with a bomb in his turban, was attacked with an axe. Charlie Hebdo picked up the cause with gusto, repeatedly satirising Muhammad and Islam in its papers, including a naked Muhammad, and an issue “guest-edited” by Islam’s prophet (“Charia Hebdo: 100 lashes if you don’t laugh!”). At least two Muslims appear to have been offended to the point of mass murder.

What do these religious sensibilities have to do with language? Visual art and writing break taboos in a similar way. All of the Abrahamic religions feature what Steven Pinker, a cognitive scientist, has called “word magic”: the idea that by saying something one can do something profound and terrible. Judaism’s God used one of just ten commandments to prohibit taking his name in vain. The penalty is death:

Take the blasphemer outside the camp. All those who heard him are to lay their hands on his head, and the entire assembly is to stone him. Say to the Israelites: 'If anyone curses his God, he will be held responsible; anyone who blasphemes the name of the LORD must be put to death. The entire assembly must stone him.’

Strictly observant Jews do not utter aloud the name of Yaweh, the Jewish deity, nor even the English word “God”. They instead use “G-d” “Hashem” or “Adonai”, depending on context.

English translations of the Jewish bible (the Old Testament, to Christians) replace Yahweh with “The LORD”, carrying the taboo into what is now the world’s biggest religion. One huge trove of avoidance-words (Gosh, golly, goodness) avoids “God”, and another (jeez, jeepers, jiminy cricket) spares Christianity’s founder the offence of hearing his name profaned.

Some think that such taboos cannot survive advancing secularisation in the West. But if Mr Pinker is right, then secularisation has far to go in some Western countries. Ireland and Poland still have blasphemy laws on the book. And while the words “damn” and “dammit” are common on American network television, “god damn” and “goddammit” are still usually bleeped out, even as other swear words have become more common.

Islam does not forbid mention of God or the prophet—indeed, the declaration of the faith, the shahadah, requires both. Instead, the taboo is displaced to the visual world: God and Muhammad may not be depicted in art. This was probably originally intended to prevent idol-worship. (As, indeed, was another of the ten commandments of Judaism and Christianity: “You shall make no idols or graven images.”) But taboos grow and shift by their nature: today, even harmless images no one would worship as an idol are taboo. The Danish cartoon crisis came after a left-wing writer struggled to find anyone who would illustrate his children’s book about the life of Muhammad. Jyllands Posten’s cartoons came as a direct response.

So the difference between the Abrahamic religions is not the existence of taboos around the deity, incarnations and prophets. It is the violence with which the taboo is enforced. The American State Department has found only one conviction for blasphemy in Christian countries, in Greece (which establishes the Greek Orthodox church). The perpetrator is likely to get off lightly for insulting a popular monk. By contrast the same report found 14 alleged blasphemers sentenced to death in Pakistan, and 19 given life sentences.

The belief that casual, satirical or profane mention of the divine is a grievous sin belongs to prehistory. It has roots in all three Abrahamic religions. But to live in 2015 requires bringing ancient beliefs into consonance with modern values. Sensible Muslims know that freedom of expression protects them, too, in places like Europe. (After all, an Islamophobic Dutch politician, Geert Wilders, wants to ban the Koran.) That means letting journalists and cartoonists be rude about their beliefs.

Writers and artists are often quite proud of their power to unsettle the powerful, but they are also usually the last people to believe literally in “word magic”, the ability to attract divine attention by mere irreverent mention. They were shocked back to reality today by the flood of blood and tears in Paris. The question is not whether the divine cares about blasphemy. All it takes is a few maniacal followers on Earth.

http://www.economist.com/blogs/pros...blasphemy?fsrc=scn/fb/te/bl/ed/dangerouswords

 

[onelastdeath]

You are comparing the 1400's to 2015?? Its not valid. It doesn't make it less worse. But that was when society wasn't as 'civilized' as now. So why support a group now because Europeans were as barbaric in 1400's??

well excuse the fukk out of me?

Society wasn't as civilized Or white people aren't the only ones with guns any more?

I never said I supported them, I said I'm not condemning them for protecting their religion, which is their right :blackye:

 

[Jazzy B.]

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2015/01/07/world/europe/ap-eu-france-newspaper-attack.html?_r=0


Security forces were hunting for the gunmen who spoke flawless, unaccented French in the military-style noon-time attack on the weekly newspaper Charlie Hebdo, located near Paris' Bastille monument. The publication's caricatures of the Prophet Muhammed have frequently drawn condemnation from Muslims.





"Hey! We avenged the Prophet Muhammad! We killed Charlie Hebdo," one of the men shouted in French, according to a video shot from a nearby building and broadcast on French TV. Other video showed two gunmen in black at a crossroads who appeared to fire down one of the streets. A cry of "Allahu akbar!" — Arabic for "God is great"— could be heard among the gunshots.






Corinne Rey, the cartoonist who said she was forced to let the gunmen in, said the men spoke fluent French and claimed to be from al-Qaida. In an interview with the newspaper l'Humanite, she said the entire shooting lasted perhaps five minutes.

The security analyst group Stratfor said the gunmen appeared to be well-trained, "from the way they handled their weapons, moved and shot. These attackers conducted a successful attack, using what they knew, instead of attempting to conduct an attack beyond their capability, failing as a result."


The video showed the killers moving deliberately and calmly. One even bent over to toss a fallen shoe back into the small black car before it sped off. The car was later found abandoned in northern Paris, police said.

Luc Poignant of the SBP police union said the attackers switched to another vehicle that had been stolen.




I hate to use my brain in this forum but here goes nothing.....

Why state 'Hey! We avenged the Prophet Muhammad! We killed Charlie Hebdo,' in the midst of a killing spree unless you know the video cam would pick up the sound? (This clarifies the motive)

obvious special ops...we all seen the ISIS vids this summer.More barbaric then efficient if anything....

all well trained. did their objective spread some disinfo and made sure not to leave behind any evidence (picked up shoe)


perfect french with accent to give away real origin....





I will go with the white man with the this is going as planned look

They're obviously French Nationals who have gone abroad to train and "fight" and returned to carry out an attack.

 

[onelastdeath]

Dude I spent over 10 years traveling Africa. Don't even argue with me about Africa.

Spend 10 years traveling Africa yet still worship white women brehs.

 

[Entropy Fan]

well excuse the fukk out of me?

Society wasn't as civilized Or white people aren't the only ones with guns any more?

I never said I supported them, I said I'm not condemning them for protecting their religion, which is their right :blackye:

EXACTLY
They used nukes....cuz they were the only ones with them. Now that others have them its all about "nuclear non proliferation"
cacs were savage in those days cuz they had all the guns. Even the racist 50s were that way cuz they were 85% of the population compared to 50% now (ignoring all the non whites they claim) They more liberal and accepting as they've lost power, its not a coincedence

 

[onelastdeath]

EXACTLY
They used nukes....cuz they were the only ones with them. Now that others have them its all about "nuclear non proliferation"
cacs were savage in those days cuz they had all the guns. Even the racist 50s were that way cuz they were 85% of the population compared to 50% now (ignoring all the non whites they claim) They more liberal and accepting as they've lost power, its not a coincedence

My point.

When white people were the only ones with big guns and their lives weren't in danger they were going crazy. Superiority complexes like a motherfukker.

The world has evolved, people can defend themselves and now its "time to be civilized".

 

[Entropy Fan]

My point.

When white people were the only ones with big guns and their lives weren't in danger they were going crazy. Superiority complexes like a motherfukker.

The world has evolved, people can defend themselves and now its "time to be civilized".

while using sanctions to kill millions from starvation and invading weaker nations and only weaker nations. cac fakkitry

 

[RoMans]

well excuse the fukk out of me?

Society wasn't as civilized Or white people aren't the only ones with guns any more?

I never said I supported them, I said I'm not condemning them for protecting their religion, which is their right :blackye:

Lets just say that humanity is lost if they resort to these measures to make their voices be heard. Also there is a difference in protecting your religion and killing people because they dont believe in your religion.

 

[3rdWorld]

Im shocked the resident coli Black Muslim's haven't ran off to go fight in Syria with their Arab breh'thren..

 

[Ego Noir]

You are comparing the 1400's to 2015?? Its not valid. It doesn't make it less worse. But that was when society wasn't as 'civilized' as now. So why support a group now because Europeans were as barbaric in 1400's??

You cant be serious right now.

Invade a nation under a lie that was WMD in an effort to pillage for resources, with over a million civilians killed, and thousands of american soldiers dead all for what amounted to a complete lie is civilized?

Unarmed american citizens are being gunned down in the street, then they tell you its YOUR fault. Over 34 cities across the face of this nation are engaged in relentless demonstrations, to gain the attention of the federal government and for a government that is self-professed "For the People, and By the People" up to today there has been ZERO statements issued by the federal government.

Are you this brainwashed?

 

[onelastdeath]

Lets just say that humanity is lost if they resort to these measures to make their voices be heard. Also there is a difference in protecting your religion and killing people because they dont believe in your religion.

White folks used the same measures to take over the world. So what is your proposal? What do Muslims do when their religion is made a mockery of by the oppressors? All the while generalizing i it to the public promoting it as nothing more than explosives and beheading? Whats your proposal?

 

[onelastdeath]

this thread