Paul George - 37 Points in 20 minutes

The G.O.D II

A ha ha
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
87,342
Reputation
5,148
Daps
193,446
He literally just lied, multiple times. I could very briefly tell the truth but then how would you tell which was the lie and which is the truth? I already provided the brief response in the earlier comment, since he tried to counter that with a bunch of false statements I had to make a longer response.

As long as fools gonna be dishonest on here then it's gonna take space to explain how they're being dishonest. :manny:

You literally just posted the most generic definition that you probably took(like everything else) from hollinger site like that proved anything. MOV and differential does factor into defensive rating You honestly gonna sit here and say beating the shyt out of a team by 50 and limiting them to barely a 100 when the average ppg right now is 110 means nothing? :mjlol:
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,331
Reputation
19,930
Daps
204,096
Reppin
the ether
You literally just posted the most generic definition that you probably took(like everything else) from hollinger site like that proved anything. MOV and differential does factor into defensive rating You honestly gonna sit here and say beating the shyt out of a team by 50 and limiting them to barely a 100 when the average ppg right now is 110 means nothing? :mjlol:
I posted the exact definition of the Defensive Rating I used when I told you the Clippers were 10th in defensive rating. That was the one straight off of Basketball Reference. You are posting the definition of some imaginary thing that as far as I can tell exists only in your head.

Since I'm the one who told you the Clippers were 10th in Defensive Rating, using the actual, published defensive rating, why are you trying to talk like you can make up some other defensive rating and argue that one? No matter what the criteria for your defensive rating is or whether or not it even exists, that has NOTHING to do with the normal defensive rating I posted right at the beginning of the conversation.

You got to be a troll.
 

The G.O.D II

A ha ha
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
87,342
Reputation
5,148
Daps
193,446
I posted the exact definition of the Defensive Rating I used when I told you the Clippers were 10th in defensive rating. That was the one straight off of Basketball Reference. You are posting the definition of some imaginary thing that as far as I can tell exists only in your head.

Since I'm the one who told you the Clippers were 10th in Defensive Rating, using the actual, published defensive rating, why are you trying to talk like you can make up some other defensive rating and argue that one? No matter what the criteria for your defensive rating is or whether or not it even exists, that has NOTHING to do with the normal defensive rating I posted right at the beginning of the conversation.

You got to be a troll.

WTF are you even babbling about? This is pure word salad posting. Nobody is saying you are wrong. Im saying there are other factors besides strictly how many opponent points are scored. Thanks for my point tho about you being a stat watcher
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,331
Reputation
19,930
Daps
204,096
Reppin
the ether
WTF are you even babbling about? This is pure word salad posting. Nobody is saying you are wrong. Im saying there are other factors besides strictly how many opponent points are scored. Thanks for my point tho about you being a stat watcher
You said their defense was shyt.

I said they were ranked 10th in defensive rating.

You said that was only because they just won a 150-101 blowout.

I said that scoring 150 was irrelevant to that defensive rating.

You said that I was an idiot for not knowing margin of victory was a factor in defensive rating, and that I'm also an idiot for clearly not watching the games and seeing their terrible defense wasn't living up to the promise of all those great defenders playing together.

I said that margin of victory had nothing to do with defensive rating, and that watching their games couldn't possibly tell you they're not living up to the promise because their three best defenders hadn't even played together yet.

You said i must have looked up the wrong defensive rating and that defensive rating really does take margin of victory into account.

I told you that didn't even make sense and pointed out I was the one that quoted the defensive rating to you in the first place, so how could it be the "wrong" one.

Now you're making even less sense. Either you haven't been able to follow the discussion at all or you're just in straight juelzing mode.
 
Top