Paul George Trade Thread

Should the Lakers trade Brandon Ingram and Loul Deng for Paul George?


  • Total voters
    57

Regular_P

Just end the season.
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
83,855
Reputation
11,189
Daps
225,488
2017-06-183vu1y.png

2017-06-181rnuqa.png


+ 2 firsts



:jbhmm:
Indy could get better offers than that first one. The Crabbe/Harkless swap for George/Jefferson is interesting, but if George bolted after next season, they'd be fukked on the wings.
 

The Fire

way more chemical than political
Supporter
Joined
Oct 31, 2014
Messages
33,770
Reputation
10,470
Daps
139,255
Reppin
brooklyn
first thought that came to mind. go all in even if it's just this year, they already give the dubs & spurs fits as is.

fukking shame that Parsons contract is so :scust:
Maybe the pacers wouldn't mind taking the cac's contract
 
  • Dap
Reactions: Meh

BVII

Pro
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
369
Reputation
80
Daps
1,343
n0MpPfR.png


Ya'll think this trade could go down if Portland sends their 3 first round draft picks this draft to Indy?
 

Malta

Sweetwater
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
66,896
Reputation
15,260
Daps
279,770
Reppin
Now who else wanna fukk with Hollywood Court?
Indy could get better offers than that first one. The Crabbe/Harkless swap for George/Jefferson is interesting, but if George bolted after next season, they'd be fukked on the wings.

Swap Exum for Rodney Hood and maybe add in a first from Utah to help, also the Blazers are fukked on the wings now. Giving up 2 of their first rounders as opposed to three would allow them to draft a wing as insurance if George does leave.


Only problem is Crabbe's contract is awful and he doesn't have upside. He's literally young Kyle korver with no IQ


He's still only 25 and we have no idea what he could look like starting at the 2, plus it's really about getting rid of Jeffersons contract and getting those first rounders.
 

iamduval

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
24,882
Reputation
1,517
Daps
61,245
Reppin
NULL
I'm a casual. Explain to me how having PG would be more beneficial for the cavs in winning a championship than having Love :ld:
 

Bolzmark

Superstar
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
8,839
Reputation
1,475
Daps
29,190
Reppin
Brooklyn
You Savannah? :leon: You already know what Bron's doing next summer? Even though the chances of him leaving Cleveland are next to 0?

Simply swapping Love for PG isn't likely to get you a championship either as I mentioned. And Love isn't overpaid, he's a max player and is getting max money as he should be
The Cavs are essentially stuck in a situation where they can't get good enough to beat the Warriors for the next couple years. I just don't see him sticking around for that. I feel like he's gonna want to try something new. He got Cleveland a 'ship. Getting PG may not, but at least you are making a change that could POSSIBLY make the difference. It's DEFINETLY not going to happen with the team they have now. We have a different opinion on what a max player is. Love averaged less than 17 points in the playoffs. He scored 6 points in a Finals elimination game. No he should not be considered a max player.
 

Malta

Sweetwater
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
66,896
Reputation
15,260
Daps
279,770
Reppin
Now who else wanna fukk with Hollywood Court?
I'm a casual. Explain to me how having PG would be more beneficial for the cavs in winning a championship than having Love :ld:


The idea is that It would allow the Cavs to play small with the Warriors and have a defender to put on KD so that Bron can guard Draymond.
 
Top