Peppa from salt n Peppa dumped Will Smith because he wasn't a thug

O.G.B

Real O.G.
Joined
Dec 1, 2012
Messages
11,118
Reputation
-420
Daps
33,082
What kills me is when any dude starts up with a "women only want thugs" rant, some people out there act like it's just a made-up excuse for cornballs/losers who can't accept the fact that women reject them for being a cornball/loser.....

And yet, here it is.....STRAIGHT from the horse's mouth :mindblown:. Hoes out here are straight-up admitting it......

Obviously, BOTH sides are right. The complaining-ass nikkas ARE being passed over by some women for being lame/a loser.....AND those same women gravitate towards thugs instead. But each side won't admit that the other side is correct.


The only problem with your premise is that some of the men that women are/have passing/passed over for thug types aren't actually lames or losers. The example with Will Smith vs Peppa further illustrates this point. Will Smith was far from the typical "lame" or "loser" (rich actor & music artist who was known worldwide & considered handsome or attractive by a large portion of female populace).

So in actuality, men don't have to admit to being wrong in regards to this scenario, because we were always right in the first place about some women passing over good quality guys for hooligans.
 
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
69,857
Reputation
31,459
Daps
413,474
Reppin
Ft. Stewart, Ga
What kills me is when any dude starts up with a "women only want thugs" rant, some people out there act like it's just a made-up excuse for cornballs/losers who can't accept the fact that women reject them for being a cornball/loser.....

And yet, here it is.....STRAIGHT from the horse's mouth :mindblown:. Hoes out here are straight-up admitting it......

Obviously, BOTH sides are right. The complaining-ass nikkas ARE being passed over by some women for being lame/a loser.....AND those same women gravitate towards thugs instead. But each side won't admit that the other side is correct.


Only issue I have with this is that a lot of dudes use this as an excuse for why a CERTAIN demographic of women have that mindset. I'm not saying this doesn't happen because it's an all too unfortunate mindset that allot of our women carry with them...


But THESE women should NOT be the ones we are chasing and crying about. Trust me, I've never been anything CLOSE to a thug, gangsta, hoodlum or anything but I pull women who are similar to me and have similar mindsets, values, and morals.


I've had girls when I was younger straight up tell me I'm nice but they want a thug nikka, truth is that none of these girls were ones I was truly checking for, so it didn't hurt me and in a way I felt sorry for them. These are the same girls who are now women posting on FB talking about "I'd rather have an exciting man than a boring man" with three kids by three different men and not a thing to show for it. The same women pushing 30 who still think the highlight of their lives are dressing in the Thotiest outfits and hitting the clubs with their "girlfriends" who are seven years younger. Who can't WAIT for the next episode of Love And Hip Hop and the last book they read was a Zane novel...


These are NOT the women we should be crying over. Will Smith didn't cry, he found a woman with similar morals, goals, and ambitions and some 17 years later he's STILL married and sharing a production company with her.
 
Joined
Aug 22, 2015
Messages
1,319
Reputation
1,110
Daps
8,128
The only problem with your premise is that some of the men that women are/have passing/passed over for thug types aren't actually lames or losers. The example with Will Smith vs Peppa further illustrates this point. Will Smith was far from the typical "lame" or "loser" (rich actor & music artist who was known worldwide & considered handsome or attractive by a large portion of female populace).

So in actuality, men don't have to admit to being wrong in regards to this scenario, because we were always right in the first place about some women passing over good quality guys for hooligans.

Okay, pre-emptive 'no homos' (where applicable) to what I'm about to say:

There's a reason why I mentioned both lames and losers...they're 2 different things (IMO).....

Will is certainly no loser, mainly for the things you already mentioned (especially his looks).....but you can tell from his music and personality overall that there's nothing thug-like or serious about him. Dude is usually smiling, being corny/a big goof during interviews and just having fun out there. There's nothing 'dangerous' about him. Even Family Guy touched on this:



Another example: the whole Russell Wilson/Ciara shyt. It doesn't matter that dude's a high-paid athlete that some women find physically attractive. Dude started playing daddy to the next man's son a bit sooner than some people found appropriate, and apparently isn't smashing Ciara BY CHOICE. Ciara had a baby by Future and didn't make him wait to smash. Yeah.....some people would consider Russell a lame for that.....

Now someone like Kent on the other hand, is a loser (by his own admission). Short as hell, broke, not attractive, angry all the time, suicidal, reviews video games and watches wrestling, etc.....he's the type who rants "women only want thugs" as an excuse for being a virgin....meanwhile Will and Russell are at least getting hoes, even if those hoes would really rather have Future......

........or Pac :mjpls: :mjlol:......
 

KingMalik

All Star
Joined
Apr 11, 2015
Messages
2,532
Reputation
1,082
Daps
10,895
This is old as hell but this is why you PAWG :sas2:

FVREn0X.jpg
 
Top