Per 36... D'Angelo Russel is putting up

UpAndComing

Veteran
Joined
Aug 18, 2013
Messages
74,227
Reputation
18,571
Daps
314,648
I don't understand the value of PER 36, especially if the guy is a starter. Probably the most useless stat I've seen.

But I'll give it to him, he's playing well as the focal point of the offense and he cooked my guys last night.

Not sure, but I think it's to concentrate the times when a player is actually making an impact on the floor

Plus the fact that no one plays the full 48 minutes of an NBA game, so there's gonna be gaping holes of the times when you're not even on the floor
 

Address_Unknown

Jesus Loves you...Your Cat doesn't. {#Dogset}
Joined
Sep 2, 2015
Messages
17,260
Reputation
13,295
Daps
83,610
papersoldiersslap_o_gifsoup_com.gif
Have faith.....:ufdup:





































































:sadcam:

Why did the Coli alert me that I've been quoted in this thread and I ain't got no posts in here outside of this one??:mindblown:
 

tremonthustler1

aka bx_representer
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
87,641
Reputation
10,202
Daps
218,146
Reppin
My Pops Forever RIP
dude still turns the ball over too much and doesnt even attempt to play D. Good win last night but Lonzo in 1 month has had more impact than DLo in 2 years. Plus he got us Kuzma

Y'all had the 28th pick in the draft breh. Even without that trade he woulda fallen to y'all
 

#1 pick

The Smart Negroes
Supporter
Joined
Jul 13, 2012
Messages
78,613
Reputation
11,784
Daps
202,716
Reppin
Lamb of God
Trading Russell in a dump will never make sense. He's young talented and cost controlled for s number of years. He would've been fine off the ball with Lonzo there as they build chemistry. It didn't make any sense.
It never made sense to me either from a talent perceptive but we got to be real. While nikkas like Malta like to talk about Russell being a fit with Lonzo, that's wasn't looking like the case and Ingram showed more fit than Russell did. Randle and Russell both really haven't shown good fit where the Lakers was going. In return, they got two players who did fit. Now my big issue with LA is KCP hasn't been much of a fit with LA
 

Premeditated

FODE TANTAN
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
32,824
Reputation
2,900
Daps
96,659
Reppin
IMMIGRANT TETHERS
Alot of Laker fans are really deluding themselves thinking Lonzo is better. Not even as rookies are they comparable.

Nets just need to surround him with 1 slasher(Levert) and a legit 3 and d guy and he'll be playing like back in Ohio state. Remember, he took that bum ass squad to the tournament
 

neph27

Superstar
Joined
May 14, 2012
Messages
4,370
Reputation
1,030
Daps
21,211
Reppin
NULL
It never made sense to me either from a talent perceptive but we got to be real. While nikkas like Malta like to talk about Russell being a fit with Lonzo, that's wasn't looking like the case and Ingram showed more fit than Russell did. Randle and Russell both really haven't shown good fit where the Lakers was going. In return, they got two players who did fit. Now my big issue with LA is KCP hasn't been much of a fit with LA

Nobody even got to find out if lonzo and Russ could play/grow together. They just dealt a young cost controlled asset (they had 6 more years of real control if they wanted it) for Brook lopez lol
 
Top