Perversions of the early Roman Emperors per Suetonius, secretary to Emperor Hadrian and imperial archivist

[King]

Man presented his dikk to babies to suck on and they thought they were sucking the breast.

That is some nasty shyt.

We get upset with some of the shyt happening now but they were clearly levels to debauchery.

 

[Sauce and Footwork]

This why pedophiles get so little time when they get sentenced. I’m not even speaking on some pro black stuff, they legit have an ancestry of sexual deviancy involving incest and pedophilia and look at things differently. Remember they forced our slave ancestors engage in pedophilia and incest to produce more slaves as if we were animals. This deviancy, It Affects them to this day. It’s in they blood

 

[Carl Tethers]

Days of Rome behaviour

 

[Vancouver Grizzly Fan]

Caligula was a straight sex demon.

 

[Trajan]

@Trajan


Care to explain your cousins?

And they didn't even include Elagabalus on the list

 

[Sleepy Floyd]

Cacs been cac'ing for a long time

 

[Top Left]

Demons

 

[Uitomy]

Our government is an extension of Rome and man that shyt be messing with my brain, everything he just described is happening probably right now with our leaders. There’s still no real discussion about Epstein!

 

[Mister Terrific]

Suetonius is widely viewed to be full of shyt when it came to the personal lives of emperors. Many times he was writing hundreds of years after the fact and he was purposely sensationalist.

Think of many ancient historians as tabloid journalists. Not only were you trying to sell books, many times you were working directly for an emperor so you tailored your histories to appeal to that persons sensibilities and family legacy. Emperor Hadrian liked gossip stories so Suetonius put it in there.

That’s why Historians nowadays are trained professionals. They can sparse out the bullshyt because they cross reference other sources and the best ones even learn the language of the people they are researching so nothing gets lost in translation.

 

[TripleAgent]

@Michael's Black Son

 

[DrBanneker]

Suetonius is widely viewed to be full of shyt when it came to the personal lives of emperors. Many times he was writing hundreds of years after the fact and he was purposely sensationalist.

Think of many ancient historians as tabloid journalists. Not only were you trying to sell books, many times you were working directly for an emperor so you tailored your histories to appeal to that persons sensibilities and family legacy. Emperor Hadrian liked gossip stories so Suetonius put it in there.

That’s why Historians nowadays are trained professionals. They can sparse out the bullshyt because they cross reference other sources and the best ones even learn the language of the people they are researching so nothing gets lost in translation.

Some stuff like the island of Capri is likely elaborated but other stuff like who they killed or the tale of Sporus with Nero are pretty well documented.

Hadrian himself had a male lover (Antinous) who fell into the Nile and died driving Hadrian to depression and making countless statues in his honor. This was something Suetonius was contemporary with so it's not like he is like explaining freaky emperors to a saint.

 

[Leasy]

All that deprived shyt started in Europe. The question is why were they so demonic in their actions and the earlier Pope's were worst