peter kadzik caught colluding with Clinton team

[无名的]

:frustratedpodesta:

 

[10:31]

Sonnnnnnnnnn

 

[SithLawd]

Brazile and Schultz were bad for optics but this is just straight up illegal
Hillary gonna hit them with the smack dvd "I dont know these nikkas"

Trumpset, we're gonna need a bigger drain

 

[Pull Up the Roots]

More misleading bullshyt from Zero Hedge.

Doing your job now is collusion. And he is powerless.

No, A DOJ Official With Podesta Ties Isn’t “Overseeing” The FBI’s Email Review


Why do people keep sourcing Zero Hedge? It's designed to mislead and spread propaganda. And you idiots fall for it.

Unmasking the Men Behind Zero Hedge, Wall Street's Renegade Blog

Colin Lokey, also known as "Tyler Durden," is breaking the first rule of Fight Club: You do not talk about Fight Club. He’s also breaking the second rule of Fight Club. (See the first rule.)

After more than a year writing for the financial website Zero Hedge under the nom de doom of the cult classic’s anarchic hero, Lokey’s going public. In doing so, he’s answering a question that has bedeviled Wall Street since the site sprang up seven years ago: Just who is Tyler Durden, anyway?

The answer, it turns out, is three people. Following an acrimonious departure this month, in which two-thirds of the trio traded allegations of hypocrisy and mental instability, Lokey, 32, decided to unmask himself and his fellow Durdens.

Lokey said the other two men are Daniel Ivandjiiski, 37, the Bulgarian-born former analyst long reputed to be behind the site, and Tim Backshall, 45, a well-known credit derivatives strategist. (Bloomberg LP competes with Zero Hedge in providing financial news and information.)

In a telephone interview, Ivandjiiski confirmed that the men had been the only Tyler Durdens on the payroll since Lokey came aboard last year, but he criticized his former colleague's decision to come forward.

Lokey, who said he wrote much of the site’s political content, claimed there was pressure to frame issues in a way he felt was disingenuous. “I tried to inject as much truth as I could into my posts, but there’s no room for it. “Russia=good. Obama=idiot. Bashar al-Assad=benevolent leader. John Kerry= dunce. Vladimir Putin=greatest leader in the history of statecraft,” Lokey wrote, describing his take on the website's politics. "

 

[StatUS]

More misleading bullshyt from Zero Hedge.

Doing your job now is collusion. And he is powerless.

No, A DOJ Official With Podesta Ties Isn’t “Overseeing” The FBI’s Email Review


Why do people keep sourcing Zero Hedge? It's designed to mislead and spread propaganda. And you idiots fall for it.

Unmasking the Men Behind Zero Hedge, Wall Street's Renegade Blog

Not playing any sides with ZH but are we supposed to trust MediaMatters who's an obvious Democrat and pro Hillary outlet?

 

[ghostwriterx]

Not playing any sides with ZH but are we supposed to trust MediaMatters who's an obvious Democrat and pro Hillary outlet?

Trey Gowdy?

Though he said he has had "many differences" with Kadzik, Rep. Trey Gowdy, R.-S.C., said on "Fox & Friends" Tuesday that he wasn't concerned about any potential conflicts of interest.

"Peter Kadzik is not a decision maker, he is a messenger," Gowdy said.

DOJ official who penned letter on Clinton probe represented her campaign chairman

 

[StatUS]

Trey Gowdy?

Though he said he has had "many differences" with Kadzik, Rep. Trey Gowdy, R.-S.C., said on "Fox & Friends" Tuesday that he wasn't concerned about any potential conflicts of interest.

"Peter Kadzik is not a decision maker, he is a messenger," Gowdy said.

DOJ official who penned letter on Clinton probe represented her campaign chairman

What?

 

[#StarkSet]

Trey Gowdy?

Though he said he has had "many differences" with Kadzik, Rep. Trey Gowdy, R.-S.C., said on "Fox & Friends" Tuesday that he wasn't concerned about any potential conflicts of interest.

"Peter Kadzik is not a decision maker, he is a messenger," Gowdy said.

DOJ official who penned letter on Clinton probe represented her campaign chairman

the leaked email didn't come out until today

 

[Pull Up the Roots]

Not playing any sides with ZH but are we supposed to trust MediaMatters who's an obvious Democrat and pro Hillary outlet?

You should be wary of everybody. You can at least check their sources for yourself, though.

 

[ghostwriterx]

the leaked email didn't come out until today

"Peter Kadzik is not a decision maker, he is a messenger,"

Did he get a promotion we didn't hear about?

 

[StatUS]

You should be wary of everybody. You can at least check their sources for yourself, though.

All I'm saying is MM only reports from one side exclusively. Plus this thread isn't really about speculation that Kadzik is head of the current investigation but that he tipped the party being investigated off about what was going on in the prior one.

 

[I_Got_Da_Burna]

Assange must be dealt with.

 

[Pull Up the Roots]

All I'm saying is MM only reports from one side exclusively. Plus this thread isn't really about speculation that Kadzik is head of the current investigation but that he tipped the party being investigated off about what was going on in the prior one.

How did he tip them off when they were being cooperative with the investigation? And tip them off to what, exactly? That email that they're touting as a smoking gun has to be the most innocuous thing... Further, they're still running with the erroneous belief that Kadzik is leading the investigation on the DOJ side when that's been debunked.

 

[StatUS]

How did he tip them off when they were being cooperative with the investigation? And tip them off to what, exactly? That email that they're touting as a smoking gun has to be the most innocuous thing... Further, they're still running with the erroneous belief that Kadzik is leading the investigation on the DOJ side when that's been debunked.

Subject: Heads Up

 

[Pull Up the Roots]

Subject: Heads Up

You're joking, right? Could you explain the collusion?