I mean, the dude was up by 30-13 with under 5 minuets to go and hes throwing 25 yard corner routes to the end zone.
You can't tell em they weren't trying for that last one for the record.
Y people on this site talk like Peyton don't have a ring or been to two superbowls
Manning gasses yall up every season, only to flop when it counts
Lets be reality, manning should have more than 1 ring tho... Hes the #1 numerous times and not done shyt.If he never went to the superbowl and won in his career you would be absolutely right.
Lets be reality, manning should have more than 1 ring tho... Hes the #1 numerous times and not done shyt.
We back to back champs thoThe guy in your avi should have more than two rings....I guess he's #1 and hasn't really done sh!t either huh?

We back to back champs tho![]()


In their playoff careers, Peyton Manning has actually played–ever so slightly–better than Tom Brady. Manning should have won just over 11 of his 19 games on average, for an expected record of 11.3 wins and 7.7 losses. Brady’s expected record is 13.5 and 9.5. So what explains the difference between their expected and actual records? Their support. An average QB would win just 40% of the games that Manning played while the support alone would be good enough for an average QB to win over half the time (52% sWin%) in Brady’s games.
...Manning’s next 6 best games where he was above average, all between 55% and 71% xWin%. In those 6 games, we would expect him to win nearly 4 of them (3.8 expected wins). He won zero. The support was so bad that an average QB would win only 1.3 of those 6 games. What poor support didn’t take care of, bad luck did. For instance, of those 6 games, the best sWin% and worst xWin% came in the same game (#12 above). That was the 2005 loss to the Steelers when Mike Vanderjagt missed the potential game-tying FG.
While Manning received positive support in just 5 of his 19 postseason games, Brady has received better than average support in over half (12) of his 23 games. Like Manning, Brady won all of his 6 best games. His expected wins of 5.1 means he was helped by +0.9 wins. In the Brady’s 6 worst games, he won 2 of them, exactly in line with his expected win total in those games.
The big difference comes in the middle. Brady played 11 games where he managed an xWin% between 49% and 70%. Based on his play, his expected win total in those 11 games is 6.4. He won 8. Some of that was support, with a slightly above average sWin% of 52%, and some of that was good luck (Tuck Rule game, anyone?).
That’s the difference. In games where Manning and Brady play great, they win. When they play poorly, they lose as often as expected. But when they play well enough to win, Brady’s defense, special teams, and running game have supported him, while Manning’s support has failed him. These are things out of a quarterback’s control that have a huge impact on the outcome of games, and therefore their legacies.

hsuper bowl bruht: 6682163 said:He is the greatest regular season quarterback. It is a disappointment to see that Payton doesnt have any success in the playoffs. He always turn out to be a victim of a 3-4 defense in the post season..
He is the greatest regular season quarterback. It is a disappointment to see that Payton doesnt have any success in the playoffs. He always turn out to be a victim of a 3-4 defense in the post season..
Logical People know this
Just add to the point.
04 Colts : Manning throws 49 TD's and still manage to loose 4 games
13 Broncos : Manning throws 51 TD's and still loose 3 games
07: Brady throws 50 and pats are undefeated.
is throwing 50 touchdowns so much better than 49 and 51?