PG is the Pacers problem

[mamba]

They need a real point guard. They don't have anyone who can facilitate. Which leads to them looking absolutely confused on offense most times.

George Hill's ineffectiveness at the 1 has really been highlighted in the playoffs this year. It's not really his fault. He's a 2 playing the 1.

Pacers front office screwed up by not addressing it before the trade deadline.

 

[jaguar paw]

Ya don't say?



We never heard this before.

 

[Higher Tech]

Great original thread idea. 5 stars.

 

[god shamgod]

talk about stating the obvious

 

[mamba]

Who should they replace Hill with?

Try to go after Rondo?

 

[10:31]

If it wasn't for George Hill's 11 points in the first quarter of game 1 the pacers would be on holiday right now

 

[NatiboyB]

Who should they replace Hill with?

Try to go after Rondo?

The pacers don't really have any decent trade chips...that wouldn't fukk up the team.

 

[tjwettem]

Word?

 

[Grams]

I thought this man was talking about Paul George :lallana:

 

[gho3st]

They need a real point guard. They don't have anyone who can facilitate. Which leads to them looking absolutely confused on offense most times.

George Hill's ineffectiveness at the 1 has really been highlighted in the playoffs this year. It's not really his fault. He's a 2 playing the 1.

Pacers front office screwed up by not addressing it before the trade deadline.

You do not need a (real)PG that can facilitate to win a championship. You need a PG that can spread the floor and defend though. And Paul George and Lance Stevenson aren't as good as Wade and Lebron.
Not to mention you got other problem like being terrible at rebounding even though you have David West, PGeorge and Hibbert() on the floor.

I thought this man was talking about Paul George :lallana:

thought so too b/c if he's talking about point guard position then his point is

 

[The God Poster]

PG is a fakkit
Fuk that nikka

 

[Soundwave]

I thought this man was talking about Paul George :lallana:

So did I, which just goes to show how many problems the Pacers have

 

[Taadow]

Thank you for this, sir.

 

[FreedS[ohh]lave]

There biggest problem is they dont have that Lebron level player,aside from the 04 Pistons what teams have won built like the pacers wit ha bunch of b level players?

 

[mamba]

You do not need a (real)PG that can facilitate to win a championship. You need a PG that can spread the floor and defend though. And Paul George and Lance Stevenson aren't as good as Wade and Lebron.
Not to mention you got other problem like being terrible at rebounding even though you have David West, PGeorge and Hibbert() on the floor.


thought so too b/c if he's talking about point guard position then his point is

The majority of NBA Championship squads have had a serviceable facilitator at the 1.

The 1 doesn't have to be on Magic's level. But, certainly someone who can set the tone.

The Heat and Bulls are the main deviations from the norm in terms of serviceable 1s. That's because they were so strong on the perimeter. Pacers are nowhere near as strong as the Bulls and Heat on the perimeter.