Pittsburgh woman goes in Target to tell Blk customers "You not suppose to be in here"

Thavoiceofthevoiceless

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 26, 2019
Messages
45,324
Reputation
6,677
Daps
140,228
Reppin
The Voiceless Realm
Doing too much. Don’t walk up on me while I’m shopping and I dont fukking know you
Yeah I like to shop in piece and I’m sure others do as well, so I’d imagine they aren’t going to take too kindly to be walked upon even with the messaging being positive.
 

Double Burger With Cheese

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
27,055
Reputation
16,809
Daps
159,608
Reppin
Atlanta
Yeah I like to shop in piece and I’m sure others do as well, so I’d imagine they aren’t going to take too kindly to be walked upon even with the messaging being positive.

She seemed pretty respectful and I’m not mad at her intent, but she’s essentially bothering people while they shop. What she’s talking about is serious to her, but likely not that serious to everyone she’s stopping, considering they’re in target in the first place. Also, this is a good way to get kicked out of a store. A more effective way would be boycotting outside the store
 

TRUEST

Superstar
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
15,243
Reputation
3,090
Daps
57,491
Reppin
NULL
There’s an opportunity here.

If black folks can have an app or online entity of some sort to keep track of how many minorities are boycotting different stores, you’ll gain back the power the republicans are trying to take away.

When the number of boycotters goes up into the hundreds of thousands and millions they will bring DEI right back with the swiftness, with an apology sales on top of it.
 

Elle Seven

Superstar
Joined
Mar 31, 2017
Messages
3,610
Reputation
2,419
Daps
14,973
She's just giving a gentle reminder, which is cool to see. It will be needed regularly in the beginning, for sure.

In relearning history with my kids, I have a different take on the Montgomery Bus Boycott - something that lasted over a year.

As a child, they would teach us about that, and I just took it as fact. As a child, I never considered the actual details of how that all worked.

As an adult, I now know that there were plenty of people who probably did not want to participate in it (for the same reasons folks laud about boycotts today). It surely had to be inconvenient and tiresome to many to completely restructure their lives for something they were not sure would be effective.

I used to think the 381 days was just the amount of time it took these a$$holes to realize black folks weren't playing with them. Now I realize that, even from day 1, it likely wasn't not an effort supported by all, but the longer it went on, many more started to join in - until the boycott really did start doing some damage.

It took time to build that momentum, and so, it had to last long enough for some people to even come around and get on board. We live in a world with the results of what these protesters accomplished after sticking to this for over a year...I have no idea how life would look for us otherwise. The point is, though, we have seen a little of the blueprint and have to understand it isn't meant to be comfortable.

OAN, I've seen someone very learned in the financial space offer a more creative approach to bringing Target to heel. Instead of boycotting, a sizeable group of black people, under some sort of organization, would commit to buying a controlling amount of Target stock and become a shareholding bloc the board now has to cater to. I suspect those in the Csuite expect us to respond with withholding our dollars in their stores, but they would be caught unawares by putting them in a position where they now have to listen to and tapdance for the same folks (as shareholders) that they tried to fukk over (as customers and vendors).

In short, we take our money and weaponize it another way against these folks.
 

Starburst

All Star
Joined
Jun 2, 2012
Messages
6,643
Reputation
-201
Daps
12,290
Reppin
NULL
I was in Target today and I wasn’t the only black face in there :manny:
I hate that she’s filming and shaming them.
 

feelosofer

#ninergang
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
51,002
Reputation
8,551
Daps
148,587
Reppin
Brick City, NJ
She's just giving a gentle reminder, which is cool to see. It will be needed regularly in the beginning, for sure.

In relearning history with my kids, I have a different take on the Montgomery Bus Boycott - something that lasted over a year.

As a child, they would teach us about that, and I just took it as fact. As a child, I never considered the actual details of how that all worked.

As an adult, I now know that there were plenty of people who probably did not want to participate in it (for the same reasons folks laud about boycotts today). It surely had to be inconvenient and tiresome to many to completely restructure their lives for something they were not sure would be effective.

I used to think the 381 days was just the amount of time it took these a$$holes to realize black folks weren't playing with them. Now I realize that, even from day 1, it likely wasn't not an effort supported by all, but the longer it went on, many more started to join in - until the boycott really did start doing some damage.

It took time to build that momentum, and so, it had to last long enough for some people to even come around and get on board. We live in a world with the results of what these protesters accomplished after sticking to this for over a year...I have no idea how life would look for us otherwise. The point is, though, we have seen a little of the blueprint and have to understand it isn't meant to be comfortable.

OAN, I've seen someone very learned in the financial space offer a more creative approach to bringing Target to heel. Instead of boycotting, a sizeable group of black people, under some sort of organization, would commit to buying a controlling amount of Target stock and become a shareholding bloc the board now has to cater to. I suspect those in the Csuite expect us to respond with withholding our dollars in their stores, but they would be caught unawares by putting them in a position where they now have to listen to and tapdance for the same folks (as shareholders) that they tried to fukk over (as customers and vendors).

In short, we take our money and weaponize it another way against these folks.

QFT. Dap. Rep.

Hmmm. This is an intriguing idea.
 

King Poetic

The D.O.G.( Disciple of God)
Supporter
Joined
Feb 15, 2013
Messages
102,351
Reputation
21,086
Daps
498,606
Reppin
Under Mi Sensi
Don’t ever approach older black folks

That old mama isn’t on social media and she did her boycotting back in the 60s
 

MajesticLion

Veteran
Joined
Jul 17, 2018
Messages
31,968
Reputation
6,326
Daps
68,936
She's just giving a gentle reminder, which is cool to see. It will be needed regularly in the beginning, for sure.

In relearning history with my kids, I have a different take on the Montgomery Bus Boycott - something that lasted over a year.

As a child, they would teach us about that, and I just took it as fact. As a child, I never considered the actual details of how that all worked.

As an adult, I now know that there were plenty of people who probably did not want to participate in it (for the same reasons folks laud about boycotts today). It surely had to be inconvenient and tiresome to many to completely restructure their lives for something they were not sure would be effective.

I used to think the 381 days was just the amount of time it took these a$$holes to realize black folks weren't playing with them. Now I realize that, even from day 1, it likely wasn't not an effort supported by all, but the longer it went on, many more started to join in - until the boycott really did start doing some damage.

It took time to build that momentum, and so, it had to last long enough for some people to even come around and get on board. We live in a world with the results of what these protesters accomplished after sticking to this for over a year...I have no idea how life would look for us otherwise. The point is, though, we have seen a little of the blueprint and have to understand it isn't meant to be comfortable.

OAN, I've seen someone very learned in the financial space offer a more creative approach to bringing Target to heel. Instead of boycotting, a sizeable group of black people, under some sort of organization, would commit to buying a controlling amount of Target stock and become a shareholding bloc the board now has to cater to. I suspect those in the Csuite expect us to respond with withholding our dollars in their stores, but they would be caught unawares by putting them in a position where they now have to listen to and tapdance for the same folks (as shareholders) that they tried to fukk over (as customers and vendors).

In short, we take our money and weaponize it another way against these folks.


Need to scale up faster.
 
Top