No the fukk you don't
I see y'all nikkas aren't very smart/tech savvy and have no idea what a cycle accurate emulator is.
Yes they do, your average retard on the street doesn't but enthusiast definitely do.I don't think anyone has ever cared about accurate emulation. I wouldn't be surprised if people are still using ZSNES
shytty documentation plus it being a console that don't nobody care about is so damn unfortunate. MS themselves could still make one if people beg enough.
in no way is that a "powerful ass computer" by today's standards. That article was written 5 years ago, and even then 3ghz wasn't that "powerful"
nikka, the damn box CPU is garbage even for 2011 standard's that's my point.in no way is that a "powerful ass computer" by today's standards. That article was written 5 years ago, and even then 3ghz wasn't that "powerful"
Be dumb as fukk while trying to call other people dumb brehs
no it isn't nikka, the damn iPhone twister CPU have better per core performance than a damn p*ssycat Jaguar cpu. Amd CPUs are OBJECTIVELY terrible and have been since the core 2 duo. Intel have been coasting for like like 5 years because they basically have a monopoly on the CPU game. Their only competitor is making CPUs that are OBJECTIVELY shyt and gave them 86℅ of the damn x86 market share. AMD IS TRASH.
That's all fine and dandy, but it's still more powerful than what's claimed to be needed in your article.
Single core performance and clock speed are more important than anything else for emulation so no it isn't.
Enthusiast are such a small percentage of most things. Like I said most people downloading emus aren't worried about cycle accuracy and all that. They just want it to run their childhood favorites and save. NESBox does that just fine so you don't need a powerful pc to enjoy playing snes etc.
And I see that you're a troll. And a very good one. It was late and I didn't pay attention but you knew what you were doing. That's why you dropped that "accurate" line. You knew that we would jump on you for that and you had that 5 year old article in the chamber, ready to fire. Possibly because you wanted to get into an argument so that you would have a reason to display your knowledge, or whatever passes for it nowadays......not knowing that, and I think I speak for @MeachTheMonster on @Hiphoplives4eva on this one......we couldn't give two shyts. In relation to the original topic, the emulator running on the Xbone, you and the guy that wrote the article you linked knows that it will run just fine. According to that article, within about 95% of the accuracy of the original. And yes I know it's more to it, and thats just a target zone, but I doubt programmers are targeting 95% if they know they can at best hit only 80. So I have to believe, logically, that 95% is a number that they can do consistently. And that's all people care about. And really, that's all anyone should care about despite the articles plea for preservation. With time, you lose some things. That's the way the world works. That's the way it always has. But you came in here for nonsense. That's why you turned the conversation away from one of capability, to one of accuracy.
I screw around with Desume's source code on my spare time and
Sure ya do.....
I got to a community college and study CIS
