PlayStation 4 or Xbox One: Which game console to buy this holiday [Engadget]

[FloorGeneral]

thats all yall do is talk exclusives cause you know the other 98% of games were better on the 360.In yall minds only exclusives mattered but to the rest of the world we know the 360 had the better games

and yes a shytload of people use their gaming console for more then just gaming

you acting like having a device that does multiple things is bad

Ummmm, Exclusives are what separate the consoles from each other. The other "98%" of games were not "better" on 360. 99% of Multi-Plats were practically identical, with the only advantages being when DLC comes out first on the other.

 

[GoldenGlove]

That power bullshyt is overrated

The ps3 was more powerful than the 360 yet the 360 had the better games(as far as smoothness and more fluid gameplay)

Acting like features dont matter or even worse trying to doc points from a system because they have more features is complete bullshyt

Its like saying my old nextel is better then my note because its better at making and receiving calls and then trying to knock the Note because of all its features

Its obvious that even with inferior specs the One is still more advanced then the ps4 and only sony stans try to act like all the features the One has doesnt matter...just like yall tried to act like only exclusives mattered when yall was getting all them shytty multi plat ports

The simplicity of the PS4 is why it'll be an easy sell.

And when one console is 100 cheaper, power does come into play. The PS3 was always more expensive than the 360, yet it was harder to program for. That's not the case this time around.

 

[Prince Akeem]

You can't go wrong with either...All according to your preference.

Real talk.

 

[MeachTheMonster]

They're saying what the XBox1 offers outside of gaming isn't worth $100 extra right now.

How can they decide what's worth $100?

From a pure tech standpoint kinect is worth much more than $100. If we compare the extra features to something like a roku or a smart tv, that's worth more than $100.

 

[jfkennedy]

How can they decide what's worth $100?

From a pure tech standpoint kinect is worth much more than $100. If we compare the extra features to something like a roku or a smart tv, that's worth more than $100.

The same way a parent will decide that maybe a kinect isn't worth $100 extra when they just want a game system for their kids. It really isn't a knock against the XB1 so I don't think y'all should take it as one.

 

[ll_simon]

How can they decide what's worth $100?

From a pure tech standpoint kinect is worth much more than $100. If we compare the extra features to something like a roku or a smart tv, that's worth more than $100.

From a retail standpoint its worth $100, MS decided that. As far as value you may be right.

 

[MeachTheMonster]

The same way a parent will decide that maybe a kinect isn't worth $100 extra when they just want a game system for their kids. It really isn't a knock against the XB1 so I don't think y'all should take it as one.

That's fine if a parent decides that. Some things are more valuable to some people. But for a website reviewer to decide what is or what isn't worth the money, i think he's missing the point.

Plenty of people have tried to paint the extra features as a negative, when in any other electronic device they'd be seen as a positive.

 

[Why-Fi]

I've seen enough to make a decision...

 

[AquaCityBoy]

Wait, so they said xbox offers more than gaming, pretty much saying ps4 don't do shyt but play games, but $100 extra is a deal breaker? They do realize that the $100 is for the Kinect, which even when half ass working is still a better option than spending $100 later on a eyecam that hasn't been shyt since ps2, right?

:uFURIOUS:

 

[marcuz]

xbots are so fury