Pope Francis: Evolution and Big Bang Theory Are Real

[blackzeus]

do you believe that a man was alive in a whale for 3 days?

Why breh? All you're going to do is neg me than run off lol.

i'll take that as a yes

besides, i already negged you

The coli is the greatest y'all

 

[Everythingg]

i'll take that as a yes

besides, i already negged you

You can take away "rep" on an internet site, but you cant take away the truth. It doesnt matter if you believe it or not, because it remains true no matter what.

And the fact that you can neg, but you cant answer my questions as well as not being able to formulate an argument to argue against my questions says it all. You dont want to believe God exists. Its not a question of "evidence" with you. Hey thats your choice...

Oh and the better question would "Do you believe a man can survive in a whale with "God's"(the Creator of Existence) guidance?". The answer would be YES to that question since whichever stipulations that are in place that wouldd NOT allow a man to survive under those circumstances would be in place BECAUSE OF the Creator. Thus, if it was His will, He could suspend said stipulations to fulfill His will and guide the man for three days while in a whale. But again, this logical answer will not be accepted by you because you dont want to believe. Again that is your choice

 

[the cac mamba]

. You dont want to believe God exists. Its not a question of "evidence" with you.

Oh and the better question would "Do you believe a man can survive in a whale with "God's"(the Creator of Existence) guidance?". The answer would be YES to that question since whichever stipulations that are in place that wouldd NOT allow a man to survive under those circumstances would be in place BECAUSE OF the Creator. Thus, if it was His will, He could suspend said stipulations to fulfill His will and guide the man for three days while in a whale. But again, this logical answer will not be accepted by you because you dont want to believe. Again that is your choice

scust. take the bible literally, brehs

 

[Futuristic Eskimo]

So thats what passes for a logical answer these days

 

[blackzeus]

You can take away "rep" on an internet site, but you cant take away the truth. It doesnt matter if you believe it or not, because it remains true no matter what.

And the fact that you can neg, but you cant answer my questions as well as not being able to formulate an argument to argue against my questions says it all. You dont want to believe God exists. Its not a question of "evidence" with you. Hey thats your choice...

Oh and the better question would "Do you believe a man can survive in a whale with "God's"(the Creator of Existence) guidance?". The answer would be YES to that question since whichever stipulations that are in place that wouldd NOT allow a man to survive under those circumstances would be in place BECAUSE OF the Creator. Thus, if it was His will, He could suspend said stipulations to fulfill His will and guide the man for three days while in a whale. But again, this logical answer will not be accepted by you because you dont want to believe. Again that is your choice

Do you believe the raising of arms by a prophet allowed an army to win a battle?

 

[blackzeus]

scust. take the bible literally, brehs

I believe in Providence, but I think a lot of the Bible is supposed to be taken allegorically. Nikkaz really thinking Samson's strength was in his hair now?

 

[the cac mamba]

I believe in Providence, but I think a lot of the Bible is supposed to be taken allegorically. Nikkaz really thinking Samson's strength was in his hair now?

i mean its clearly allegorical



bill oreilly () is a HUGE jesus apologist and even he would admit that shyt is allegorical

if u wanna believe that jesus and his dad are floating around watching you, cool . but dont tell me noahs ark happened. dont tell me men live in whales. all this magic shyt thats physically impossible today could happen when people didnt know what the sun was

 

[Everythingg]

scust. take the bible literally, brehs

Another sidestep by the cac Deion Sanders. Now lets take this a step at a time.

First, bold the part of the post you quoted that implies to or not to take the story LITERAL.

So thats what passes for a logical answer these days

Yes chief. If we suggest that the Creator of our existence put certain stipulations in place that "hinder" us from living, then its pretty logical to believe that this Creator could suspend those stipulations as He wished. That is absolutely logical.

Do you believe the raising of arms by a prophet allowed an army to win a battle?

No. The One that sent the prophet is what "allowed an army to win a battle."

 

[the cac mamba]

No. The One that sent the prophet is what "allowed an army to win a battle."

so he takes sides with his creations

i mean i guess that makes sense when he picks which football team to bless every weekend

 

[Everythingg]

I believe in Providence, but I think a lot of the Bible is supposed to be taken allegorically. Nikkaz really thinking Samson's strength was in his hair now?

If you believe its to be taken allegorically (which means to take meaning from right?), than what difference does it make that a person believes its LITERAL (and takes meaning from it) vs a person does not believe its LITERAL but still takes meaning from it?

so he takes sides with his creations

If one side gives God Almighty praise, honor and glory, as well as giving Him thanks for the blessings in His or her life then that person or group will obviously be at an advantage in His eyes over those that do not and that spurn God and His existence whilst mocking Him.

Take it like this, Im the first side mentioned and you're the other. Thats why you do not address things I say and rather neg.

 

[blackzeus]

If you believe its to be taken allegorically (which means to take meaning from right?), than what difference does it make that a person believes its LITERAL (and takes meaning from it) vs a person does not believe its LITERAL but still takes meaning from it?

Are you seriously asking the difference in mental capacity between someone who believes Samson's strength being in his hair is a story with some deeper meaning vs someone who literally believes Samson was a bodybuilder who lost the ability to bench 500 lbs from a haircut?

 

[无名的]

Now what about that ark?

 

[Everythingg]

Are you seriously asking the difference in mental capacity between someone who believes Samson's strength being in his hair is a story with some deeper meaning vs someone who literally believes Samson was a bodybuilder who lost the ability to bench 500 lbs from a haircut?

Let me get this straight. You can read the bible and take it almeaning from it allegorically but you cant understand my simple question?Here lets try again. Pay close attention to the BOLDED:

If you believe its to be taken allegorically (which means to take meaning from right?), than what difference does it make that a person believes its LITERAL (and takes meaning from it) vs a person does not believe its LITERAL but still takes meaning from it?

Now lets see if you can answer this simple question....

 

[the cac mamba]

If you believe its to be taken allegorically (which means to take meaning from right?), than what difference does it make that a person believes its LITERAL (and takes meaning from it) vs a person does not believe its LITERAL but still takes meaning from it?

because its either real or it isnt

 

[the cac mamba]

If one side gives God Almighty praise, honor and glory, as well as giving Him thanks for the blessings in His or her life then that person or group will obviously be at an advantage in His eyes over those that do not and that spurn God and His existence whilst mocking Him.

Take it like this, Im the first side mentioned and you're the other. Thats why you do not address things I say and rather neg.

except, 2 billion muslims would say you arent

i know you're pretty deluded and believe youre on a speaking basis with god, but trust me, that aint the case