President Elect Twitter Fingers Basically Asking for Dissent

[Tony D'Amato]

The Flag Protection Act of 2005 was a proposed United States federal law introduced by Senator Bob Bennett (R-Utah), with Senator Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y.) as original co-sponsor. The other co-sponsors included Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.), Mark Pryor (D-Ark.) and Thomas Carper (D-Del.).[1]

The law would have prohibited burning or otherwise destroying and damaging the US flag with the primary purpose of intimidation or inciting immediate violence or for the act of terrorism. It called for a punishment of no more than one year in prison and a fine of no more than $100,000; unless that flag was property of the United States Government, in which case the penalty would be a fine of not more than $250,000, not more than two years in prison, or both

No loss of citizenship and it didn't pass

 

[OG Talk]

No loss of citizenship and it didn't pass

Neither will this. GOP leadership is already rejecting in. Even arch far right conservatives like Anthony Scalia knew this was unconstitutional..

Good to know that you were totally cool with Miss Hilary cosigning two years in prison though.

 

[TEKBEATZ]

Why do alway go in trumps threads

 

[Pull Up the Roots]

The Flag Protection Act of 2005 was a proposed United States federal law introduced by Senator Bob Bennett (R-Utah), with Senator Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y.) as original co-sponsor. The other co-sponsors included Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.), Mark Pryor (D-Ark.) and Thomas Carper (D-Del.).[1]

The law would have prohibited burning or otherwise destroying and damaging the US flag with the primary purpose of intimidation or inciting immediate violence or for the act of terrorism. It called for a punishment of no more than one year in prison and a fine of no more than $100,000; unless that flag was property of the United States Government, in which case the penalty would be a fine of not more than $250,000, not more than two years in prison, or both

It was a terrible ideal then and it's a terrible ideal now. However, they also voted against the flag desecration bill of 2006, so he has a point. This is all irrelevant now, though. And serves as nothing more than a distraction. This isn't a tit-for-tat game. It's time to move beyond deflecting with whataboutism. She lost. Trump is the President-elect.

 

[Berniewood Hogan]

Talks about revoking citizenship, using "those 2nd amendment folks" to take out his political opponents, says the Saudis should have nukes.


HL trolls: "Hear no evil, see no evil, speak mad lulz ftw lmbo"

 

[THE MACHINE]

What's scary is the people cosigning this in the sub-tweets. Someone pointed out that it would be unconstitutional to which a Trump supporter replied ''it can be changed''

Somebody should have replied "So can the 2nd amendment "

 

[Mantis Toboggan M.D.]

Talks about revoking citizenship, using "those 2nd amendment folks" to take out his political opponents, says the Saudis should have nukes.


HL trolls: "Hear no evil, see no evil, speak mad lulz ftw lmbo"

yet there's still a large number of dummies here who think he was the better choice

 

[King Kreole]

so what's the strategy what is he trying to do to the media?

By allowing yourselves to be led around by every Trump tweet like children, you're fulfilling his goal. Did you stop to think why Trump posted that flag burning tweet? Like, what prompted it? It seemingly came out of nowhere, didn't it? Perhaps he wants you to be outraged by the flag burning tweet, just like he wanted you to be outraged by that 2nd amendment comment and all the other wild shyt he said during the election, just like he wants you to think he's going to set up FEMA camps. Remember, it was Steve Bannon who wanted to "let Trump be Trump".

The cumulative effect of you thinking (and tweeting/posting/saying) that these Trump utterances should be construed in a literal, realistic sense is the demolition of the shared "reality" we believe ourselves to be living in. The gap between the "reality" you offer ("Trump is being serious and we're about to enter the 4th Reich") and the "reality" most people outside the bubble inhabit is widened by your outrage, which creates an environment of chaos and confusion. Who is credible now? Are you and the MSM telling us to be outraged credible? Y'all spent the past year smugly laughing and saying Trump could never be elected, and now we're supposed to believe you when you tell us to be afraid of Trump, or that his tweets constitute a credible threat? Not only is any message coming from your side poisoned, it is poisoned because it is coming from your side. People think the "fake news" phenomenon is limited to far-right wing conspiracy sites, but all news is fake news now.

Quotes like this:

Trump is doing what people SAID Obama would do.

are exactly what Trump's media strategy relies on.

 

[Arithmetic]

But Hillary was the same they said


When was the last time an incoming President said something like this?

 

[Airfeezy]

Critize the President go to Jail tweet soon come

 

[Jesus]

I'm moving thinking about moving to Mississippi or Alabama, do you think I'll be ok

You serious?

 

[MeachTheMonster]

I'm at how the penalty is either loss of citizenship or just one year in jail.

 

[wire28]

just imagine if we had hillary

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

By allowing yourselves to be led around by every Trump tweet like children, you're fulfilling his goal. Did you stop to think why Trump posted that flag burning tweet? Like, what prompted it? It seemingly came out of nowhere, didn't it? Perhaps he wants you to be outraged by the flag burning tweet, just like he wanted you to be outraged by that 2nd amendment comment and all the other wild shyt he said during the election, just like he wants you to think he's going to set up FEMA camps. Remember, it was Steve Bannon who wanted to "let Trump be Trump".

The cumulative effect of you thinking (and tweeting/posting/saying) that these Trump utterances should be construed in a literal, realistic sense is the demolition of the shared "reality" we believe ourselves to be living in. The gap between the "reality" you offer ("Trump is being serious and we're about to enter the 4th Reich") and the "reality" most people outside the bubble inhabit is widened by your outrage, which creates an environment of chaos and confusion. Who is credible now? Are you and the MSM telling us to be outraged credible? Y'all spent the past year smugly laughing and saying Trump could never be elected, and now we're supposed to believe you when you tell us to be afraid of Trump, or that his tweets constitute a credible threat? Not only is any message coming from your side poisoned, it is poisoned because it is coming from your side. People think the "fake news" phenomenon is limited to far-right wing conspiracy sites, but all news is fake news now.

Quotes like this: are exactly what Trump's media strategy relies on.

adam Curtis knocked that documentary out the park.

his other ones are god-body too

 

[The American]

00000000000000000000000000029286

I wish we could cut off Trump's arms so he can't function no more..

Fixed.

People gotta stop sayin they wannna hide from what trump truly feels, it's a good thing that he tweets dumb shyt because now we know what we're up against. Let him keep tweeting. Imagine if he was clandestine just to fukk us over when we least expected. Now we know he will be the WOAT, so now we can mobilise to get him removed from office. The outrage has to be strong enough to take action to get him out of there. Dude is a cancer.

@King Kreole Get Kaepernick out your avi, breh, he would never fukk with you, you are a fakkit. Trust that Colin would murk trump with his own bare hands. You insult Kaep and us by pretending to be his stan. If you stan the fakkit, you are in direct opposition to Colin K.

So now we gotta burn as many of those shyt flags as we can to send a message that this is America, not a fascist state. If you have one of those flags, burn it on video and pass it around. If you have one but are too p*ssy to burn it, PM me so you can mail it to me and I will burn it for you.

Remember, this is one of the most American things you can do:

Never underestimate the fakkit and his inbred supporters.

"Since Auschwitz, we know what man is capable of. And since Hiroshima, we
know what is at stake." - Viktor E. Frankl