President Elect Twitter Fingers Basically Asking for Dissent

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Superstar
Joined
Aug 14, 2012
Messages
6,541
Reputation
135
Daps
15,960
Hillary and other Dems sponsored an anti flag desecration bill in 2005 with the penalty being imprisonment. But you wouldn't care about that would you? That would be one of those necessary evils?

Good call

This motherfucjer asking for citizenship to be revoked though which is worse than what Hillary proposed
 

BmoreGorilla

Veteran
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
39,611
Reputation
33,689
Daps
256,871
Reppin
Man, woman, and child
Loss of citizenship??! :russ:

Where they do that at? I thought punishment had to be proportional to the crime.

Remember back in the day when a statement like that would be a huge political scandal which had to be weathered by the administration?:mjgrin:
I feel like if this was any other administration it would be a big deal

But since it's Trump everyone is like :shaq2:
 

Saiyajin

Superstar
Joined
Nov 3, 2015
Messages
10,081
Reputation
3,365
Daps
54,030
Forget about the flag desecration and the part about it being made illegal, the future President is talking about revoking citizenship. That is much more worrisome.

I can only plead to some of you reading this. Arm yourselves, no matter where you stand on guns and gun control issues.

When the state arbitrarily revokes citizenship and its bestowed rights, what follows is imprisonment and violence towards political opponents and dissidents.
shyts unbelievable how brazen he is before even getting sworn in

talking about revoking citizenships for protestors wtf ?


i guarantee none of those GOP "constitution defenders" founding father dikkrider will say a word against this

I know no matter what Kaep will continue to kneel :wow: :mjcry: :salute:
 

Saiyajin

Superstar
Joined
Nov 3, 2015
Messages
10,081
Reputation
3,365
Daps
54,030
I'm really starting to buy the idea that these tweets are a distraction whether purposeful or not on behalf of Donald Trump. However I do think those who work for him don't mind his nonsense as a distraction while they work on real nefarious shyt behind the scenes.

I already know trump is an idiot and has the politics of someone who post on the Fox News comment section. The question is what are those who are actually working on policy doing ?
hes doing what he did during the campaign

hes purposely overwhelming the media by saying more and more outrageous things, the media reports on it but the shyt he says sounds is so retarded it feels like the media is being straight up sensationalist as usual. Then itll get to the point where everyone becomes desensitized and he'll claim the media is absolutely biased against him and cacs will agree with him and will start ignoring all his criticisms because they feel the media is always unfairly demonizing and attacking white "men" (dont know if they should be considered men tbh)
 

phobos:\\

All Star
Joined
Nov 20, 2016
Messages
750
Reputation
240
Daps
3,044
Hillary and other Dems sponsored an anti flag desecration bill in 2005 with the penalty being imprisonment. But you wouldn't care about that would you? That would be one of those necessary evils?

In 2005, over a decade ago. Was she sponsoring those same Bills or even mentioning them in 2016?
 

Saiyajin

Superstar
Joined
Nov 3, 2015
Messages
10,081
Reputation
3,365
Daps
54,030
What's scary is the people cosigning this in the sub-tweets. Someone pointed out that it would be unconstitutional to which a Trump supporter replied ''it can be changed''

:merchant:
:yeshrug:

if the 1st amendment is changed theyll be the ones to suffer the most with their constant hate speech. Theyre assuming Trump will be president forever
 

Type Username Here

Not a new member
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
16,368
Reputation
2,400
Daps
32,647
Reppin
humans
In 2005, over a decade ago. Was she sponsoring those same Bills or even mentioning them in 2016?

What I am implying is that this behavior is dangerous, no matter who advocates it. It also underscores the bullshyt argument about the lesser of two evils as it pertains to what you lose when you select the lesser of two evils.

I'm not arguing that the two are equivalent. I'm only asking why I have to put up with a less authoritative, corrupt and untrustworthy individual?
 

BaggerofTea

dapcity.com
Supporter
Joined
Sep 15, 2014
Messages
54,578
Reputation
-763
Daps
266,989
What I am implying is that this behavior is dangerous, no matter who advocates it. It also underscores the bullshyt argument about the lesser of two evils as it pertains to what you lose when you select the lesser of two evils.

I'm not arguing that the two are equivalent. I'm only asking why I have to put up with a less authoritative, corrupt and untrustworthy individual?

this is you

658.png
 
Top