Pro wrestling needs to evolve.

Nero Christ

Sniper out now on all digital platforms brev
Joined
Jan 15, 2017
Messages
44,463
Reputation
15,642
Daps
153,258
Reppin
St. Lucia
what is needed first and foremost is true competition.

On the WWE's end, they need a younger diverse writing staff, one that understands the modern world and wrestling and how to properly mix both. And like others said, they need that one storyline that can capture interest like the NWO forming or Austin/McMahon. I always felt if they did away with the "authority figure" and had the whole roster form factions and battle with each other like The Warriors, that could be huge.
 

Berniewood Hogan

IT'S BERNIE SANDERS WITH A STEEL CHAIR!
Joined
Aug 1, 2012
Messages
17,983
Reputation
6,860
Daps
88,334
Reppin
nWg
you just described Lucha Underground.
THESE MARKS REFUSE TO WATCH ANYTHING BESIDES WWE, BROTHER! THEY GET HOT ABOUT BURIALS AND PUSHES AND ANGLES, THEN THEY TUNE IN MONDAY NIGHT FOR THREE HOURS WHILE EATING DELICIOUS BAGEL BITES, DUDE! THEY DON'T KNOW IT A SHOOT WHEN IT A WORK AND YOU WORK JABRONI MARKS INTO A SHOOT, MEAN GENE!
 

Drones

Visions of $
Joined
Sep 12, 2014
Messages
3,568
Reputation
1,560
Daps
19,976
having wrestlers week 4 times a week makes them less of a draw. drake and the weeknd sell mad records, but if they were to release an album weekly, the fire would die out quick.
You also allow your wrestlers to work better matches by putting them out there less often. One of the reasons everyone is on New Japan's bumper right now is because the matches look more realistic than what they're used to. That's a result of the wrestlers being extremely talented, but it's also because they can work stiffer since they have about half the dates of WWE and do a lot less travel.

The proliferation of MMA in the last decade or so has changed the public perception of what a fight looks like. IMO Eliminating some of the house show dates from WWE's tour would help them immensely in putting out a more realistic product. And if the wrestlers can go harder by wrestling less often the fans will anticipate the matches more.
 

Apex

Banned
Joined
Oct 8, 2013
Messages
8,099
Reputation
-111
Daps
12,520
You also allow your wrestlers to work better matches by putting them out there less often. One of the reasons everyone is on New Japan's bumper right now is because the matches look more realistic than what they're used to. That's a result of the wrestlers being extremely talented, but it's also because they can work stiffer since they have about half the dates of WWE and do a lot less travel.

The proliferation of MMA in the last decade or so has changed the public perception of what a fight looks like. IMO Eliminating some of the house show dates from WWE's tour would help them immensely in putting out a more realistic product. And if the wrestlers can go harder by wrestling less often the fans will anticipate the matches more.
Imagine an all-access/UFC embedded type thing that the company could do too. It would really legitimize pro wrestling.
 

threattonature

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
24,664
Reputation
3,982
Daps
79,535
There definitely needs to be a change. For one they definitely need to bring back jobbers. Having jobbers allows wrestlers to establish their finishers and signature moves. It also gives a wrestler a chance to look strong and build their characters. The 50/50 booking has to go away.

Also I think they should have a rotating schedule. Put each wrestler on 9 months out of the year. Write them out of storylines for three months a year to give fans a chance to miss them and to also open up more TV time for other wrestlers. They need to keep the top matchups seperated. Make it a big deal when two wrestlers actually meet for the first time.

Now that they have the network they should eventually cut back down to 4-6 PPVs a year. Give storylines time to build so that they mean something. Having someone have an issue for a couple weeks to set up a PPV match leads to none of the matches really meaning anything.

They need more realistic violence too. I know all the workrate people love the flashy moves but sometimes a good heated brawl is needed.
 

Apex

Banned
Joined
Oct 8, 2013
Messages
8,099
Reputation
-111
Daps
12,520
There definitely needs to be a change. For one they definitely need to bring back jobbers. Having jobbers allows wrestlers to establish their finishers and signature moves. It also gives a wrestler a chance to look strong and build their characters. The 50/50 booking has to go away.

Also I think they should have a rotating schedule. Put each wrestler on 9 months out of the year. Write them out of storylines for three months a year to give fans a chance to miss them and to also open up more TV time for other wrestlers. They need to keep the top matchups seperated. Make it a big deal when two wrestlers actually meet for the first time.

Now that they have the network they should eventually cut back down to 4-6 PPVs a year. Give storylines time to build so that they mean something. Having someone have an issue for a couple weeks to set up a PPV match leads to none of the matches really meaning anything.

They need more realistic violence too. I know all the workrate people love the flashy moves but sometimes a good heated brawl is needed.
Your method of improving the business has to do with the writing, and I agree with what you said. However, I want to change the presentation of it.
 

Silkk

Thats My Quarterback :to:
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
203,674
Reputation
21,024
Daps
514,830
I feel like the more "serious" it tried to be, the more "scripted" it would come off.

What you are describing (to me) is like a scripted version of UFC. I don't think that would work in professional wrestling because the nature of professional wrestling is unbelievable feats and suspending disbelief and over the top moves etc.

I mean it would look really cheesy for a guy to give a great "after the match" promo in the guise of a boxer (looking at replays etc.) when he blatantly catches a man who does a diving crossbody at him from the top rope.

.
You just described New Japan, and they do it extremely well
 

LurkNowitzki

All Star
Joined
Dec 21, 2013
Messages
1,323
Reputation
170
Daps
3,763
Reppin
Lurk City
what is needed first and foremost is true competition.

On the WWE's end, they need a younger diverse writing staff, one that understands the modern world and wrestling and how to properly mix both. And like others said, they need that one storyline that can capture interest like the NWO forming or Austin/McMahon. I always felt if they did away with the "authority figure" and had the whole roster form factions and battle with each other like The Warriors, that could be huge.

Totally agree with this..people will still complain no matter what because the show isn't going the way they wanted to.
 

dbp

All Star
Joined
Jul 12, 2012
Messages
1,410
Reputation
151
Daps
5,012
Reppin
NULL
The proliferation of MMA in the last decade or so has changed the public perception of what a fight looks like. IMO Eliminating some of the house show dates from WWE's tour would help them immensely in putting out a more realistic product. And if the wrestlers can go harder by wrestling less often the fans will anticipate the matches more.

Thing is, even MMA has proven that characters > than technical ability when it comes to fan interest and drawing power.

See Chael Sonnen, Ronda, Brock, Conner, etc..
 

Apex

Banned
Joined
Oct 8, 2013
Messages
8,099
Reputation
-111
Daps
12,520
Thing is, even MMA has proven that characters > than technical ability when it comes to fan interest and drawing power.

See Chael Sonnen, Ronda, Brock, Conner, etc..
Big draws have always had both ability and marketability.

Ali, Tyson, Rock, Austin, Conor, Floyd, Kobe...
 

Apex

Banned
Joined
Oct 8, 2013
Messages
8,099
Reputation
-111
Daps
12,520
Thing is, even MMA has proven that characters > than technical ability when it comes to fan interest and drawing power.

See Chael Sonnen, Ronda, Brock, Conner, etc..
 
Top