I'm not a scientist but I believe diet plays a big role. The more food became easily accessible the more nutrients humans assumed, thus growth.
I'm not a scientist though.
Proof evolution doesnt exist
- Thread starter BrothaZay
- Start date
I'm not a scientist but I believe diet plays a big role. The more food became easily accessible the more nutrients humans assumed, thus growth.
I'm not a scientist though.
Be unable to answer a simple question so resort to the use of sarcasm brehs :mjkkk:
Don't appreciate the original topic so highjack it by discussing aids brehs
Gotta love the "enlightened" bunch, constantly using sarcasm but when you ask them how the universe started they're all like
Don't appreciate the original topic so highjack it by discussing aids brehs
Gotta love the "enlightened" bunch, constantly using sarcasm but when you ask them how the universe started they're all like
stealthbomber
cruising at 30,000
Evolution is a fact.
To the extent that it's called a theory, theory has a completely different meaning in terms of the scientific community than it does in casual conversation.
As such, it's the word "theory" that throws off the person who does not believe or does not understand it. They use that word to undermine the scientific integrity of it.
As Neil deGrasse Tyson is credited with saying: "The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it."
In scientific terms, evolution is a "theory". But so is gravity.
Yet no one questions the latter.
I mean, goodness, there are people who deny evolution but take antibiotics when they get sick.
The irony of it is hilarious.
To the extent that it's called a theory, theory has a completely different meaning in terms of the scientific community than it does in casual conversation.
As such, it's the word "theory" that throws off the person who does not believe or does not understand it. They use that word to undermine the scientific integrity of it.
As Neil deGrasse Tyson is credited with saying: "The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it."
In scientific terms, evolution is a "theory". But so is gravity.
Yet no one questions the latter.
I mean, goodness, there are people who deny evolution but take antibiotics when they get sick.
The irony of it is hilarious.
And you know this how?
If we so called evolved with them? Why have we changed so much and the simians are still the same as the always been
Kings County
Law III | Law XXV | Law XV
so a nikka did that, has blood work to back him up and u call it bullshyt ok
Prove it.
AIDS can't be cured by drinking root juice. fukking idiot.
Do you even know what HIV is?
Marvel
Psalm 149:5-9
I'm not a scientist but I believe diet plays a big role. The more food became easily accessible the more nutrients humans assumed, thus growth.
I'm not a scientist though.
Diet, environment and genetics are the main influences of height. Currently, the Dutch are the tallest but historically the tallest people in the world were the Dinka but the war with the Arabs led to poor nutrition and stress stunted growth. If all things are equal in terms of nutrition...Africans would easily have most of the tallest groups on the planet. I'm 6'3" and I am among the shorter men in my generation when compared to my brother, cousins, and 2nd cousins. My younger brother is 6'5". Just among my cousins in the US...I have 6'4, 6'5", 6'9" on one set of siblings. 6"2, 6'6" on another set. 6'5" and 6'7" on another set. 6"3 and 6'4" on another. 6'3" (16 yrs old), 6"5" on another 6'2" (at 12 yrs old), 6'3" on another set.
Last edited:
Every animal alive is at its terminal branch of evolution. Evolution isn't a ladder. Its a tree.
Modern simians didn't always look like they do now. They evolved to their present state.
I question gravity,we don't know why any of this shyt does what it does,we workin off old rules...how the hell we makin rules from what we know when we admittedly don't know
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/13/science/13gravity.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
far as we know aliens could dropped us off here,oh its wrong to believe in aliens because we aint never seen em
....science and religion are some of the oldest rackets in the world,both have good sides and down sides. fukk tryna figure out the past and work on building flying cars,cloaking devices and other cool shyt
...u will NEVER know unless whoevers behind all this gives u the answer....aliens and god sound more likely than any of the science theories...I don't believe in perfect accidents that happen just by chance
I question gravity,we don't know why any of this shyt does what it does,we workin off old rules...how the hell we makin rules from what we know when we admittedly don't know
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/13/science/13gravity.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
far as we know aliens could dropped us off here,oh its wrong to believe in aliens because we aint never seen em
Science is a racket? That's unbelievably ignorant. Do you even know what science is? Also you're acting like the guy in the article "debunked" gravity when he was simply questioning it.
I don't understand how so many people can think that the shyt they make up in their mind in an afternoon is more legitimate than years of hardwork.
And the reason God and aliens sound more likely is because those answers are easier to comprehend.
