The theory is bullshyt, is what I'm telling you, It's no a fact, what test of evidence supports evolution, you probably think dinosaurs were real too
why wouldn't he?

The theory is bullshyt, is what I'm telling you, It's no a fact, what test of evidence supports evolution, you probably think dinosaurs were real too

The difference is that the person questioning it have credentials and legitimacy. And simply questioning something doesn't mean it's wrong. Which is something you need to realize.
What do you mean by orderly? We can only see about 3% of the known universe but because things seem "orderly" on earth (after billions of years) the entire universe is "orderly?"
"The universe is in perfect orbit" what the fukk are you even saying? The you honestly know what the hell you're talking about?
You believe in miracles because it requires little to no brain power. It's convenient.
And who said only earth my smart dumb brethren? As I said earlier in this post we don't even know a tenth of the universe, so evolution resulting in intelligent life forms on other worlds is possible. And in my opinion, likely.
And where did God or the aliens come from? If they came from "nothing" why is it so hard for you to believe that we came from "nothing" without the middle man?
That's not how science works.
Does that sound like "anything is possible" to you?
Saying "God did it" isn't studying, observing, or experimenting. It's lazy.

...so yes its a miracle if everything just happened to work out when supposedly the universe leans towards disorder
" and scientist will be able to say "see we told yall evolution was real
"...i don't know man,we don't know....no reason to be bound by earth thoughts though...the fact many scientist believe in a higher power should tell u they with me in believing this shyt couldn't have just happened
why wouldn't he?![]()
(1) dinosaur fossilized bone discoveries having occurred only within the last two centuries and in huge unusual concentrated quantities going against the laws of nature and probability;
(2) dinosaur discoverers generally, and most typically, not being disinterested parties without a vested interest;
(3) the nature of public display preparation, calling into question the integrity and source of fossils, and allowing for the possibility of tampering and bone substitution, and the possibility of fraudulent activities on a systemic basis;
(4) existing artistic drawings and public exhibits showing off-balance and awkward postures that basic physics would rule out as being possible;
(5} very low odds of all these dinosaur bones being fossilized but relatively few bones of other animals;
(6) implications of dinosaur discoveries to the theory of evolution and the belief that man was created in God's image, suggesting possible hidden and subtle political or religious agendas served on a naive and unsuspecting public; and,
(7) a lack of funding for organizations and people questioning or being skeptical of each and every discovery and public display.
The difference is that the person questioning it have credentials and legitimacy. And simply questioning something doesn't mean it's wrong. Which is something you need to realize.
What do you mean by orderly? We can only see about 3% of the known universe but because things seem "orderly" on earth (after billions of years) the entire universe is "orderly?"
"The universe is in perfect orbit" what the fukk are you even saying? The you honestly know what the hell you're talking about?
You believe in miracles because it requires little to no brain power. It's convenient.
And who said only earth my smart dumb brethren? As I said earlier in this post we don't even know a tenth of the universe, so evolution resulting in intelligent life forms on other worlds is possible. And in my opinion, likely.
And where did God or the aliens come from? If they came from "nothing" why is it so hard for you to believe that we came from "nothing" without the middle man?
That's not how science works.
Does that sound like "anything is possible" to you?
Saying "God did it" isn't studying, observing, or experimenting. It's lazy.
This statement is confusing to me. “We can only see about 3% of the known universe.” Wouldn’t they have to know how big the known universe is, and if they know how big it is, wouldn’t that mean they can see 100% of it? As you can see, I rarely post, but this is legitimately confusing to me. Help a brother understand this.
i made a 78 in biology![]()
ok we bragging about Cs and shyt now
i seen it all

