PROOF of Democrat collusion to push out Progressive candidates
- Thread starter GSR
- Start date
Just so I'm clear, are you and this guy saying that we should let politicians and insiders pick the candidates for elections? If that's not what you're saying clear up what you are saying for me.
AnonymityX1000
Veteran
AnonymityX1000
Veteran
They already in power. The waltz been over my G. lol
ADevilYouKhow
Rhyme Reason
You know what primaries are right?
AnonymityX1000
Veteran
Yeah when voters not consultants pick who should represent a party in the general election.
ADevilYouKhow
Rhyme Reason
Okay. So is this just one of those complaints from the everyone gets a sticker generation then. Gotcha.
AnonymityX1000
Veteran
So you are against representative government and think it should be moneyed interests picking candidates?Right, why I said "keeps". It's a trend which is as old as modern mass politics.
Doesn't seem to be ending any time soon, either.
I'm fully aware of primaries but if qualified candidates are being sabotaged and asked to drop out before the race how are the people really making a choice.
I also don't get the logic of stacking the deck for a candidate because you think they have a better chance of winning in the general election. You're essentially saying this person doesn't connect with our base enough to win a primary, but they'll definitely come out to support him in the general along with the people who don't like our party.
That seems delusional.
ADevilYouKhow
Rhyme Reason
What’s up with the false narratives?
AnonymityX1000
Veteran
What's a trend? There have been presidents from both parties in almost equal number. And after that the breakdown is very different depending on the region we are talking about.
And really fukk a party, let's get into policy.
AnonymityX1000
Veteran
Answer the question and fix the narrative.
The voter is on the ballot.
The voter is able to fundraising.
The voter is able to run ads.
This is just his form of campaigning and nothing more. And it's his right to campaign as dirty as he'd like.
What’s missing from this is a why and a how.
Suggesting politicians shouldnt support people they agree with during the primary seems like an odd ask.
But I'm willing to listen.
Any look at the polling numbers?
The voter is able to fundraising.
The voter is able to run ads.
This is just his form of campaigning and nothing more. And it's his right to campaign as dirty as he'd like.
What’s missing from this is a why and a how.
Suggesting politicians shouldnt support people they agree with during the primary seems like an odd ask.
But I'm willing to listen.
Any look at the polling numbers?