AnonymityX1000
Veteran
How? We are talking about the DCCC picking and choosing who they financially support.We can agree on that, but we seem to be moving a long way from the initial premise of this thread.
How? We are talking about the DCCC picking and choosing who they financially support.We can agree on that, but we seem to be moving a long way from the initial premise of this thread.
What's that have to do with corporate spending, super pacs, lobbying etc.?How? We are talking about the DCCC picking and choosing who they financially support.
What is your qualm?it's not just this race. watch the entire video. which i know you didnt because you responded to quickly. this is not the short 4 min sketch video. it's them talking about this video and the overall theme of whats going on.
Refer to my post about only wanting public funds in campaigns. It leads to this atmosphere of perceived or real favoritism.What's that have to do with corporate spending, super pacs, lobbying etc.?
I only see these threads when they support someone who isn't as progressive, but never when they do.
It seems a bit dishonest to me.
But that isn't the law.Refer to my post about only wanting public funds in campaigns. It leads to this atmosphere of perceived or real favoritism.
What about the DCCC's claim they support who they think will win. Does that sound dishonest or nah?
I asked you whether you think the DCCC is being honest about who and why they finance candidates. A rather straight forward question, you don't have an opinion on that?But that isn't the law.
That's not how American politics works.
So suggesting they are rigging, being fraudulent, illegal, or operating outside the norm is dishonest.
If you want to change the system get candidates in that will.
Until then give your candidate the best chance to win.
BTW, dems have been winning
The DCCC isn't hiding who they're financing or why they are are financing them.I asked you whether you think the DCCC is being honest about who and why they finance candidates. A rather straight forward question, you don't have an opinion on that?
Gotcha.The DCCC isn't hiding who they're financing or why they are are financing them.
They're reasoning may be wrong, but that's another discussion
![]()
Yall trust them with this? Also fukk Joe Manchin 1000 times.
Progressives are about stopping the vicious cycle of "socialism being antithetical to both interpretations of liberalism." And it takes thinking past one or two election cycles.
would you rather the Heritage foundation do it?How? We are talking about the DCCC picking and choosing who they financially support.
I guess the DCCC should support candidates they think will lose?Refer to my post about only wanting public funds in campaigns. It leads to this atmosphere of perceived or real favoritism.
What about the DCCC's claim they support who they think will win. Does that sound dishonest or nah?