props to asian sprinters - they still tryin

Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
39,600
Reputation
-17,881
Daps
84,294
Reppin
NULL
White people can run, there is nothing inherent about black people that makes them faster. This takes away from the athletic work the black athlete does.
I remember in Greece a white guy came in pretty high, but it was the result of a mis-start.
The white dude from the US did well too, in Greece too, Jeremy Wariner

Cosign.

I get pissed off by this racist thinking as well. Makes us look like we don't work hard or anything. There might be small differences here or there physically but they got nothing to do with race.

Black athletes simply work harder than whites.
 
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
39,600
Reputation
-17,881
Daps
84,294
Reppin
NULL
while cacs quit long time ago. :russ:

saw the whole competition and asian sprinters still be runnin 100m. didn't they finish pretty well in 4x4 relay too few years ago?



hell there was a half nikka running for japan. :lolbron:




when was the last time cacs ran a legit 100m? :jbhmm:


Asians are fast. I remember in my high school the fastest kid was Asian. He used to compete in the state 100m finals and do pretty well.

I don't know why black people have brought into these racist white theories. Nothing makes us inherently faster. We just work harder to maximize our natural talents. Don't take their BS that black people are more athletic as a compliment. That's just another way of them saying they are more intelligent and thus deserve to rule the world.
 

Hiphoplives4eva

Solid Gold Dashikis
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
42,422
Reputation
3,702
Daps
152,137
Reppin
black love, unity, and music
Cosign.

I get pissed off by this racist thinking as well. Makes us look like we don't work hard or anything. There might be small differences here or there physically but they got nothing to do with race.

Black athletes simply work harder than whites.
:lolbron:
 

LurkMoar

Veteran
Joined
Mar 30, 2013
Messages
27,202
Reputation
2,955
Daps
87,053
Reppin
NULL
Cosign.

I get pissed off by this racist thinking as well. Makes us look like we don't work hard or anything. There might be small differences here or there physically but they got nothing to do with race.

Black athletes simply work harder than whites.



at the elite level west African descent are genetically superior to others when it comes to sprinting, East Africans are superior in long distance. Everyone works hard in the olympics dumbass.
 
Last edited:

Pacni99a12

All Star
Joined
Sep 21, 2014
Messages
2,118
Reputation
537
Daps
9,679
Asians are fast. I remember in my high school the fastest kid was Asian. He used to compete in the state 100m finals and do pretty well.

I don't know why black people have brought into these racist white theories. Nothing makes us inherently faster. We just work harder to maximize our natural talents. Don't take their BS that black people are more athletic as a compliment. That's just another way of them saying they are more intelligent and thus deserve to rule the world.

Nah just not true fam. If we are different enough genetically to make us have darker skin, different skulls, noses, lips, hair texture, etc then its ridiculous to think that is where it stops. Everything isn't 100 percent equal. That preschool logic. We are different physically. Maybe slightly but thats all it takes. Just looking at different races its no doubt that we have different builds typically.
 

David_TheMan

Banned
Joined
Dec 2, 2015
Messages
40,574
Reputation
-3,240
Daps
89,549
at the elite level west Africans are genetically superior to others when it comes to sprinting, East Africans are superior in long distance. Everyone works hard in the olympics dumbass.
Stop man, you spouting white race theory that has no basis in science.

http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1027&context=hilltopreview
...Genetic determinism can best be defined as the idea that genes are a determining factor in the formation of certain complex traits in humans and their behavior (Harpalani, 2004). Claims of genetic superiority in certain groups or “races” of people, to be scientific and valid, must be proved in order to conclude genetic determinism. Using that idea as a framework, authors like Entine who deduce that there is a genetic basis for Black athletic predominance have three main objectives to prove. Vinay Harpalani is one of the most outspoken critics of using genetic determinism to validate notions of inferiority or the superiority of certain groups (in this case Black athletes). He argues that in order for any of Entine’s claims to be valid he must prove that: 1) there is a systematic way to define Black and White populations; 2) consistent and plausible genetic differences between the populations can be demonstrated; 3) a link between those genetic differences and athletic performance can be clearly shown (2004).

An examination of those three criteria, using prominent biological and anthropological theories, can shed light onto racial genetic determinism in regards to Entine’s thesis. It has been accepted generally by anthropologists that race is neither a genetically nor biologically sound paradigm but instead a social construct based largely on Western society’s obsession with superficial physical features such as skin color (Harpalani, 2004). Even those who make arguments for a biological definition of race acknowledge that that definition would not correspond to simplistic notions of people being labeled as “Black” and “White” (Andreasen, 1998). Prominent anthropologists such as Jonathon Marks have also recently weighed in on this issue, debunking notions of genetically-based racial differences. Marks writes that Entine is saying one of three things: that the very best Black athletes have an inherent genetic advantage over the very best White athletes; that the average Black athlete has a genetic advantage over the average White athlete; that all Blacks have the genetic potential to be better athletes than all Whites. Clearly these three propositions are both unknowable and scientifically untenable. Marks writes that “the first statement is trivial, the secondly statistically intractable, and the third ridiculous for its racial essentialism” (Marks, 2000: 1077).

The second criterion demonstrating across the board genetic variations between populations has in recent years been roundly debunked. Recently, out of the scientific community we have seen a huge influx of genetic work, testing, and experimentation in determining the linkage, if any, between notions of race and biology. Recent work on alleles, a part of a gene that produces variation in inherited characteristics, has shown that allele frequency comparisons among different human populations rarely show any discontinuities between them (Marks, 2002; Molnar, 1998). Like the allele analysis, studies that focus on comparing different and varied human populations help to support the perception that human physical traits vary gradually across the entire global landscape. Differences in height, skin color, and hair texture are simply the result of climate-related variation. The reason for the different appearances of an individual from China and a native Kenyan is that across the environmental landscape small changes have produced different ways of dealing with those environments. To say that a Kenyan is naturally more attuned to becoming a champion runner is simply false; he or she is simply more attuned to living in his or her environment in the best way dictated or determined by human evolution.

The wide range of physical differences among people across the global environmental landscape makes it exceedingly difficult to entertain the notion that there are four or five non-overlapping, distinct races. The more scientists measure human traits, the fewer discrete differences they find. As Marks writes, “Nature has not created four or five distinct, non-overlapping genetic groups of people, but rather the human species possesses remarkably little genetic variation when compared with other organisms” (2002: 34). However, in his preface, Entine initially sets up his argument by stating, “Biological factors specific to populations can exaggerate the impact of anatomical differences” (2000: xi). This is in stark contrast to scientific studies which, time and time again, have failed to locate concrete biological differences specific only to certain populations. Noted social critic Pilar Ossario observes, “We can't find any genetic markers that are in everybody of a particular race and in nobody of some other race” (2003).

You are saying white supremacist arguments that do nothing but discredit the work and effort of black people world wide and reduce their accomplishments, as well as setting up non blacks as deserving of more praise for doing the same actions.
 

FabTrey

Superstar
Joined
Apr 2, 2017
Messages
13,646
Reputation
-1,483
Daps
29,594
you nikkas lyin to yourself if you think we don't have more fast twitchy muscles than other races

ain't no cacs be running 4.3 40 dash anytime soon :ufdup:

jeremy lin faster than any cac ballers and he is the only asian baller in the nba. :russ:
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,331
Reputation
19,940
Daps
204,116
Reppin
the ether
ain't no cacs be running 4.3 40 dash anytime soon :ufdup:

jeremy lin faster than any cac ballers and he is the only asian baller in the nba. :russ:

Ryan Swope just did. :gucci:



Don Beebe ran a 4.21 forty in 1989, matching Deion. Hand-timed for both though.

Looked it up and Matt Jones, Kevin Curtis, and Jeremy Bloom were right there too.

Matt Jones was a QB at 6'6", 242lbs, 4.37 forty, 40-inch vertical and a 10'10" broad jump, and did NOTHING on the NFL.

:dwillhuh:

images
 
Last edited:

LurkMoar

Veteran
Joined
Mar 30, 2013
Messages
27,202
Reputation
2,955
Daps
87,053
Reppin
NULL
Stop man, you spouting white race theory that has no basis in science.

http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1027&context=hilltopreview


You are saying white supremacist arguments that do nothing but discredit the work and effort of black people world wide and reduce their accomplishments, as well as setting up non blacks as deserving of more praise for doing the same actions.



No, im not discrediting any hard work and effort of black athletes. At the same time its stupid to believe that black people just work harder at the elite level when everyone else is competing. Everyone works hard at elite level athletics. Theres a reason west africans dominate explosive sports and sprints and thats because we have more fast twitch muscles.

The logic racist use is that whites must be more intelligent if blacks are more athletic but there is no scientific proof of this. The black man is not only the best athlete on the planet he is also just as intelligent as any other man on the planet.
 

LurkMoar

Veteran
Joined
Mar 30, 2013
Messages
27,202
Reputation
2,955
Daps
87,053
Reppin
NULL
With that logic i guess white people just need to work harder to start competing in sprinting.
 

Edub

Veteran
Joined
Jan 31, 2015
Messages
32,594
Reputation
2,571
Daps
73,360
White people can run, there is nothing inherent about black people that makes them faster.[/B] This takes away from the athletic work the black athlete does.
I remember in Greece a white guy came in pretty high, but it was the result of a mis-start.
The white dude from the US did well too, in Greece too, Jeremy Wariner


C'mon man....you serious? :mjlol:....
 
Top