Prosecutors pushing for Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs to spend at least 11 years in prison

CodeBlaMeVi

I love not to know so I can know more...
Supporter
Joined
Oct 3, 2013
Messages
39,106
Reputation
3,641
Daps
107,212
Yes they do if they deviate from what the guidelines suggest. And this judge can just read my post you quoted to satisfy that and finish it with the Cassie beating video. He wouldn't have to though to give him half of what the prosecutors are requesting. Guidelines are suggesting 5.8 to 7.25 years :francis:
He is not convicted of any of that. Per the guidelines, they can’t use anything he was a acquitted. Dudes don’t get 180 days for DV so stop it, five. It’s going to be some upset people if it is done fairly.
 

Anerdyblackguy

Knicks in 4
Supporter
Joined
Oct 19, 2015
Messages
64,665
Reputation
18,729
Daps
359,004
If they are lucky they may get half of that. They got some little wins that puts him away for 5-6years but overall the Feds completely lost this one.

He’s not getting eleven
 

Bolzmark

Superstar
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
8,763
Reputation
1,437
Daps
28,878
Reppin
ATL
He is not convicted of any of that. Per the guidelines, they can’t use anything he was an acquitted. Dudes don’t get 180 days for DV so stop it, five. It’s going to be some upset people if it is done fairly.
He doesnt have to be convicted of that for the judge to use that testimony/evidence that came out during the trial. You don’t seriously think that stuff is not going to have an impact on the judge do you? He already clued you in when he game his reasoning to denying Puffs bond. He has a range of what he can sentence him to, and that testimony about other things he did is relevant in his decision. No he can’t sentence him to Life as if he was convicted of RICO, but he damm sure can use the evidence they tried to use to convict him to influence his decision.
 

Bolzmark

Superstar
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
8,763
Reputation
1,437
Daps
28,878
Reppin
ATL
as a first conviction? That's what gets convictions tossed
Yes as a first conviction. Convictions don’t get tossed because a judge gave a harsh sentence. Later on it can possibly be reduced but you don’t throw out convictions because you thought the sentence was too high.
 

Bolzmark

Superstar
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
8,763
Reputation
1,437
Daps
28,878
Reppin
ATL
He also has a track record of sentencing below the guidelines. People are concerned he might give multiple years based on him not giving bail but he also said he'd consider whether or not to drop the charges completely. No one knows what he's going to do
Of course no one knows what he’s gonna do. I’m just giving reasons why he may give him some years. He might say fukk them hoes and let him go home Friday. We are all guessing.
 

CodeBlaMeVi

I love not to know so I can know more...
Supporter
Joined
Oct 3, 2013
Messages
39,106
Reputation
3,641
Daps
107,212
He doesnt have to be convicted of that for the judge to use that testimony/evidence that came out during the trial. You don’t seriously think that stuff is not going to have an impact on the judge do you? He already clued you in when he game his reasoning to denying Puffs bond. He has a range of what he can sentence him to, and that testimony about other things he did is relevant in his decision. No he can’t sentence him to Life as if he was convicted of RICO, but he damm sure can use the evidence they tried to use to convict him to influence his decision.
Testimony is not evidence. The conviction would have made it evidence. Since he was found not guilty, it is hearsay. One of the enhancements the prosecution is using is fear whether Diddy poses a threat to Cassie or not. However, sticking to sentencing, the jury stated they weren’t coerced so the judge cannot justifiably turn around and say well I believe they were from their testimony. Can’t do it. The government is trying to cheat like they’ve been allowed to do all trial. This is desperation and it is disgusting from a judicial standpoint.
 

the artist known az

Hail the victors
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
41,318
Reputation
6,347
Daps
98,522
Reppin
TSC FA' Life #ByrdGang
Of course no one knows what he’s gonna do. I’m just giving reasons why he may give him some years. He might say fukk them hoes and let him go home Friday. We are all guessing.
That wasn't what you were saying. You were giving reasons why he would give him years otherwise I wouldn't have responded to you the way I did
 

Bolzmark

Superstar
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
8,763
Reputation
1,437
Daps
28,878
Reppin
ATL
Testimony is not evidence. The conviction would have made it evidence. Since he was found not guilty, it is hearsay. One of the enhancements the prosecution is using is fear whether Diddy poses a threat to Cassie or not. However, sticking to sentencing, the jury stated they weren’t coerced so the judge cannot justifiably turn around and say well I believe they were from their testimony. Can’t do it. The government is trying to cheat like they’ve been allowed to do all trial. This is desperation and it is disgusting from a judicial standpoint.
:mjlol:
I'm laughing because in every trial I have been involved in either Voir Dire or opening statements this is the EXACT OPPOSITE of what we tell the jury. Uhhh, actually sir, testimony IS evidence. Evidence is not just something you can touch, or look at on a video screen. When a witness testifies everything they say from the stand is evidence. You do realize that there are people in jail who are in there from testimony alone right?

Also dude, that is NOT the definition of hearsay. Hearsay is an out of court statement offered in court to try to prove the truth of the matter asserted. It is considered unreliable because it is not coming from the person who originally made the statement, but rather someone else who is just repeating what they heard somebody else say. For example, I am testifying on the stand and I say "CodeBlameVI said he saw Puff punch Cassie in the face". Now I didn't see it, I'm just repeating what I heard YOU say you saw. Hearsay is usually inadmissible, although there are exceptions.

Yeah, the Judge can say he believes whatever he wants. He can't sentence Puff for RICO or sex trafficking, but he can use that evidence that he saw and heard to influence his decision on what he gives him. You think that video of Puff kickin Cassies azz is not going to influence his decision??? And no he wasn't convicted of beating her but it is evidence that came out during the trial. He may believe Puff did try to burn up Cudis car and hold that against him. Go read the judges decision on Puffs last attempt at getting a bond. He's telling you point blank in it about what he believes Puff did and it was not stuff he was convicted of.
 

Bolzmark

Superstar
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
8,763
Reputation
1,437
Daps
28,878
Reppin
ATL
That wasn't what you were saying. You were giving reasons why he would give him years otherwise I wouldn't have responded to you the way I did
I don't think you saw where I said anything was definite. He can use what he heard in the trial to justify giving him years in prison. He can also say fukk all that and let him go home immediately. I never said anything was a guarantee.
 

GunRanger

Veteran
Joined
May 17, 2014
Messages
32,351
Reputation
5,125
Daps
106,850
They keep saying for the safety of the victims, but the male prostitutes arent worried at all for their safety.

Cassie got married and had kids but now all of a sudden acts like she needs him locked him for peace.

If Diddy gets 11 years, thats when you need to worry because then he'll have nnothing to lose and would want revenge
 
Top