He is not convicted of any of that. Per the guidelines, they can’t use anything he was a acquitted. Dudes don’t get 180 days for DV so stop it, five. It’s going to be some upset people if it is done fairly.Yes they do if they deviate from what the guidelines suggest. And this judge can just read my post you quoted to satisfy that and finish it with the Cassie beating video. He wouldn't have to though to give him half of what the prosecutors are requesting. Guidelines are suggesting 5.8 to 7.25 years![]()
He doesnt have to be convicted of that for the judge to use that testimony/evidence that came out during the trial. You don’t seriously think that stuff is not going to have an impact on the judge do you? He already clued you in when he game his reasoning to denying Puffs bond. He has a range of what he can sentence him to, and that testimony about other things he did is relevant in his decision. No he can’t sentence him to Life as if he was convicted of RICO, but he damm sure can use the evidence they tried to use to convict him to influence his decision.He is not convicted of any of that. Per the guidelines, they can’t use anything he was an acquitted. Dudes don’t get 180 days for DV so stop it, five. It’s going to be some upset people if it is done fairly.
Yes as a first conviction. Convictions don’t get tossed because a judge gave a harsh sentence. Later on it can possibly be reduced but you don’t throw out convictions because you thought the sentence was too high.as a first conviction? That's what gets convictions tossed
Of course no one knows what he’s gonna do. I’m just giving reasons why he may give him some years. He might say fukk them hoes and let him go home Friday. We are all guessing.He also has a track record of sentencing below the guidelines. People are concerned he might give multiple years based on him not giving bail but he also said he'd consider whether or not to drop the charges completely. No one knows what he's going to do
Testimony is not evidence. The conviction would have made it evidence. Since he was found not guilty, it is hearsay. One of the enhancements the prosecution is using is fear whether Diddy poses a threat to Cassie or not. However, sticking to sentencing, the jury stated they weren’t coerced so the judge cannot justifiably turn around and say well I believe they were from their testimony. Can’t do it. The government is trying to cheat like they’ve been allowed to do all trial. This is desperation and it is disgusting from a judicial standpoint.He doesnt have to be convicted of that for the judge to use that testimony/evidence that came out during the trial. You don’t seriously think that stuff is not going to have an impact on the judge do you? He already clued you in when he game his reasoning to denying Puffs bond. He has a range of what he can sentence him to, and that testimony about other things he did is relevant in his decision. No he can’t sentence him to Life as if he was convicted of RICO, but he damm sure can use the evidence they tried to use to convict him to influence his decision.
That wasn't what you were saying. You were giving reasons why he would give him years otherwise I wouldn't have responded to you the way I didOf course no one knows what he’s gonna do. I’m just giving reasons why he may give him some years. He might say fukk them hoes and let him go home Friday. We are all guessing.
Testimony is not evidence. The conviction would have made it evidence. Since he was found not guilty, it is hearsay. One of the enhancements the prosecution is using is fear whether Diddy poses a threat to Cassie or not. However, sticking to sentencing, the jury stated they weren’t coerced so the judge cannot justifiably turn around and say well I believe they were from their testimony. Can’t do it. The government is trying to cheat like they’ve been allowed to do all trial. This is desperation and it is disgusting from a judicial standpoint.
I don't think you saw where I said anything was definite. He can use what he heard in the trial to justify giving him years in prison. He can also say fukk all that and let him go home immediately. I never said anything was a guarantee.That wasn't what you were saying. You were giving reasons why he would give him years otherwise I wouldn't have responded to you the way I did
Wouldn’t surprise me if they are quietly building their caseWait until they tie him in with Keefe D