PS3 v.s PS2

Tom

Banned
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
12,276
Reputation
-366
Daps
7,007
Reppin
They see me trolling, they hating.....
cheatcc article.....

ps2vsps3.jpg


The next PlayStation and Xbox might not be expected until at least next year, but the Wii U's impending launch later this year marks the beginning of the long-awaited end of this generation of consoles. It's hard to believe it, but it's been seven long years since the Xbox 360 kicked this generation off, with the PS3 and Wii following a year later in 2006. So here we are, in 2012, with the eighth generation of consoles on the horizon. It's an exciting time, and one many gamers have been looking forward to for a few years now. With over 150 million sold, the PS2 was and remains the uncontended champ—its crown has yet to be nabbed by Nintendo's Wii or DS, or any other gaming console—but unfortunately for Sony, for a multitude of reasons, they weren't able to recapture that magic with the PS3.

Nintendo finds itself in a similar position as they desperately try to push their Wii U, a console that's been struggling with a bit of an identity crisis. One of the many reasons the PS2 was so insanely successful was its massive collection of games, which included Metal Gear Solid 2 and 3, Gran Turismo 4, Final Fantasy X, and God of War 1 and 2. It managed the impressive feat of catering to the casual gamers as well as the "hardcore," without making a big deal of it.


ps2vsps3_1.jpg


When it came to the hardware, it was top of the line, and because the controller hadn't changed since the original PlayStation, gamers didn't have to learn their way around a new iteration. It helped that this controller was arguably better than the GameCube's bizarrely organized layout and the Xbox's controller, which was seemingly designed for people with huge hands. The DualShock was the clear winner.

Sony made an excellent move when they decided to keep the DualShock with the PS3 (let's just forget about the quickly scrapped Boomerang concept and all that SixAxis nonsense). Unfortunately, while the PS2 was a fairly cheap console with a fantastic arsenal of some of the best video games available, Sony thought it'd be best to trash those good ideas in favor of an insanely expensive launch price ($599!), no rumble on the controller, and some of the most spine-tingling commercials I've ever seen. Seriously, that crying baby commercial will stick with me until the end of my days. The PS3 has since dropped to a more manageable price tag, but asking gamers who wished to adopt it early to pay so much definitely created some bad blood between Sony and their fans.

The PS2 had, and still has, one of the best game libraries of all the time. Whatever you're into, it has something for you. Looking for one of those weird Japanese sex games? The PS2 totally has that. Or maybe you'd rather hide in a box so you can leap out in front of a soldier and pump him full of lead? You can do that too.

ps2vsps3_2.jpg


Still, the exclusive game library is an area where the PS3 has really excelled. When it comes to exclusives, Sony might even be ahead of Microsoft and Nintendo, both in the number of exclusives and their quality. You have Killzone, InFAMOUS, LittleBigPlanet, Uncharted, Resistance, and the aforementioned God of War, Metal Gear Solid, and Gran Turismo. This is one area where the PS3 has really grown, potentially overshadowing the PS2.

It's no secret the PS3 is the most powerful system of the three, and while this has translated to some of the best-looking games of this generation coming exclusively to the PS3, the added complexity has also made it more difficult for studios to develop games for the platform. We'll never see anything as gorgeous as Uncharted come to the Wii or Xbox 360, but the added cost and resources required to make games that are noticeably better than what's possible on Microsoft's console isn't easy on developers. This tends to mean that unless they're a first-party studio (Naughty Dog, Quantic Dreams, Insomniac, etc.) a studio won't really be able to take full advantage of the PS3's more "exotic" hardware.

When it comes to being user-friendly, the PS2 was hard to beat. As DVDs gained momentum, replacing VHS, the PS2 was at the forefront of the trend. This made the PS2 a fantastic DVD player, and that's something that's continued with the PS3. If I want to play a movie, I throw it in my PS3, and the same goes for Blu-rays (though that really goes without saying).

Sony's always been one to push new technology, even after losing the Betamax vs. VHS format war way back in the 70's. When the Blu-ray vs. HD DVD war began, Sony went all in with the PS3 and it eventually paid off, at least for the most part. Blu-ray won, but still today it hasn't been able to pick up much momentum as digital continues to become a likely contender for the primary format of the next generation. For now, the PS3's Blu-ray capabilities give it a definite head up over the competition, and, at the very least, I'm not afraid that watching movies on it is going to shorten its life span, as I am with the Xbox 360.

ps2vsps3_3.jpg


Online functionality wasn't big when the PS2 was young, but it's become very important with this generation. Sony and Microsoft have really pushed their consoles as all-in-one entertainment systems for the home. Whether you want to play games alone or with friends online, watch Netflix, YouTube, Amazon, Hulu, Zune, whatever—giving console owners as many potential uses for their PS3 or Xbox 360, and to a lesser extent, the Wii, this has become a focus for the Big Three. It'd be unfair to compare the features of the PS2 to those of the PS3, because it'd clearly be the PS3 that would come out on top.

Overall, Sony's managed to bring gamers two incredible entertainment systems. You can do more with the PS3, and the exclusives are better than they've ever been, but the library is significantly smaller than what's available for the PS2. You'd think because of the way gamers favor it that the PS2 would be the clear victor, but it's actually really close. The two consoles have similar controllers and excellent hardware, but while Nintendo does whatever it is they're trying to do and Microsoft focuses more and more on the functionality (apps, social, etc.) over games, Sony has continued to keep the gamer above everything else.

It's no question that I spent more time with and enjoyed my PS2 over any other console I've ever owned. If my house had caught fire, I'd have run out with my PS2 in one hand and my Gameboy in the other. It's for this reason that I'd have to pick the PS2 as the winner. Whether or not Sony will be able to make a glorious comeback with their next console is something we won't know until next year. But I can wait.

PS2 vs. PS3 - Cheat Code Central
 
Top