PS4 BASIC ONLINE MULTIPLAYER COSTS MONEY!!! BOMBS DROPPED

hex

Super Moderator
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
39,250
Reputation
20,352
Daps
201,370
See you're hating on the premise because of the execution.... Just because something isn't executed right doesn't mean its a FAIL......

Whoever made Tomb Raider didn't a shytty job of it....but multiplayer should be optional in every game for the future...thats how I see it...

I truly don't buy single player games....shyt gotta be optional atleast

What you're saying still makes no sense. You don't buy non-MP games....that's fine. You saying "they should all have MP" would be like me saying "every movie should have comedy regardless of genre because I prefer comedy". Some shyt is single player, it is what it is. The reason the MP in those games is terrible, is because they aren't meant to be MP, and people like you (no offense) convinced the devs they should do it anyway.

Fred.
 

FreshABM

Dollaz make Sense $$ ABM Commas After My Commas
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
3,444
Reputation
-9
Daps
2,295
Reppin
ABM Headquarters The Flossy Life
What you're saying still makes no sense. You don't buy non-MP games....that's fine. You saying "they should all have MP" would be like me saying "every movie should have comedy regardless of genre because I prefer comedy". Some shyt is single player, it is what it is. The reason the MP in those games is terrible, is because they aren't meant to be MP, and people like you (no offense) convinced the devs they should do it anyway.

Fred.

Horrible analogy Fred :whew:

You can have a multiplayer game that has a option for single player

You cannot have comedy in every genre or it will change that genre into something else....

O and no offensive taken.. You should blame the devs who half ass the multiplayer..thats all I'm saying ..
 
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
11,653
Reputation
1,496
Daps
24,518
Reppin
The Ghetto of Oz
You bought a PS4 or XB1?

If you buy one you will still have your PS3 for free Netflix so my point still stands.

Sorry I'm a

:troll:


So I have no idea what the point was..

I might actually givafuk depending on what hour it is

:troll:


But I'm prolly gonna get the PS4 even though I don't play "games"

anymore.... really...


I'm just a tech junkie.. I'll prolly get Google glass ..like a crackhead shaking at the register





















Just for the hit
 

posterchild336

Superstar
Joined
Jun 22, 2012
Messages
8,093
Reputation
1,275
Daps
19,020
Reppin
NULL
LIKE HOW THEY JUST SLIPPED THAT IN ON YOU FUNBOIS?? :laff:

LOOKS LIKE YOU ALL GET TO PAY FOR LESS NOW

XBOX WON
your own microsoft people are jumping ship on every website, i went on IGN and the comments i saw there were the same there, and pretty much every other site I have been to..I had both systems but at the end of the day I cant support a company that does not respect the people who made them....the paying customer, they release products that are known to be incomplete and faulty and we still pay for it, people have finally began to speak by switching over...

Xbox One PlayStation 4 comparison: Sony less restrictive | BGR

Not too long ago — in fact, it was less than a month ago — I was giddy with anticipation thinking about buying an Xbox One this fall. I mean, a next-generation gaming console that doubles as a TV set-top box and that gives me access to Skype over my television set? Where do I sign up? But then Microsoft actually released the details about how the Xbox One would work and they were filled with enough pitchfork-wielding devils to make me seriously reconsider my commitment to buying the console.
[More from BGR: iOS 7 is ‘positively mind-blowing’]
The reason I object to Microsoft’s various Xbox One policies is straightforward: They all limit consumer choice in a fairly invasive manner. The requirement that gamers log on at least once a day just to play the games they’ve already paid for is particularly onerous, especially for people who live in countries with spotty Internet connectivity, for military people deployed overseas and for people who bring their consoles with them on vacation so they can enjoy games in the evenings. Similarly, the company’s rule that games can only be given to other people once is an absurd restriction that dictates what you can do with the property you’ve already paid $60 to own.
[More from BGR: Is Apple ditching the ‘Black & Slate’ color option on the iPhone 5S?]
The only thing holding me back from swearing off the Xbox One all together was my fear that Sony would enact the same kinds of policies for used games and Internet connectivity that Microsoft did, thus leaving me no real option for buying a new gaming console. But I was pleasantly surprised on Monday when I learned that Sony’s PlayStation 4 will let you buy, sell and trade used games at will, that it won’t force you to check in online once a day just to play games and that its Kinect-like sensor will be a completely option addition. Throw in the lower $400 price tag and Sony has, for all intents and purposes, sealed the deal for me.
The fact that Sony so proudly and openly crowed about how much less restrictive the PlayStation 4 is compared to the Xbox One also shows that Microsoft was probably not under withering pressure from gaming publishers to add tough DRM policies on its new console. Instead it seems that Microsoft has mostly fallen victim to its own arrogance: The company figured that since it had become the dominant player in the console wars that it could implement more restrictive policies than any other console and that no one would care. You could see this sort of arrogance on display when former Microsoft Studios creative director Adam Orth told gamers to “deal with it” when they raised objections to requiring Internet connectivity to play games and it seems the company hasn’t learned anything since then.
Here’s hoping that Microsoft is proven wrong in its bet that consumers won’t care about these decisions. Because even if the company does a complete 180 and reverses its Xbox One policies to conform with those established by the PlayStation 4, there’s no way that I’m giving them my money for this generation of consoles. Buying the Xbox One would, simply put, be rewarding bad behavior and would send a signal to Microsoft that it can go even further with limiting consumer choice in the future without risking a significant backlash.
So as much as I’ve enjoyed my adventures with Master Chief and the rest of the cast from Halo over the years, it seems that my time as an Xbox gamer is at an end. Congratulations on netting a new customer, Sony — now don’t make the same mistakes going forward that Microsoft did.
 

The Devil's Advocate

Call me Dad
Joined
Jun 1, 2012
Messages
36,597
Reputation
8,160
Daps
100,942
Reppin
Better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven
first of all ... #Knickstape

But homie ...Playing offline in 2013 ??? :merchant: We off that


Touch screen everything....cloud services....technology is really turning up

and dudes are still playing single player games...by themselves?? :yeshrug:

I'm good on that....I have more fun playing with other ppl ...Plus playing against the computer can become very easy ..or just plain boring.........

In the future EVERY GAME should be multiplayer....like why not??


also they charging playstation owners to play online meanwhile they don't even have dedicated servers and PSN ain't shyt :bryan:


it's 2013... we still playing single player offline :rudy:

nikka.. you ever see a top 10 list in games... pc, xbox, ps, wii, this year, last year, 1980, all time???????


single player games are top sellers everytime.. offline co-op games are high sellers... if you check online numbers, most sports games aren't played online..

as a matter of fact, with the exception of shooters, you can't find an online community, that's close the amount of games sold


so i really have no idea why you're making this point.. or trying to. your personal preference is YOUR personal preference. but its not the majority at all here in 2013, and i doubt it'll be the majority any time soon.


people don't understand this all comes down to options. paying for online sucks but I HAVE NO OPTION.. if i want a next gen console, i will have to pay for it.. do i like it.. hell no.. do i have another OPTION.. hell no

that's people's issue with the xbox. they ain't giving no options.. you WILL be online.. period.. no option.. you WILL NOT trade these games.. no option.. you WILL NOT rent a game.. no option.. you WILL have a kinect on.. no option


people don't like "no options" shyt i planned on getting both systems.. figured ps4 would have the free online and exclusive games i like.. and live is better than psn so i'd get a few games over there

now i compare the options and there's no way in hell i'm getting an xbox. i'm not paying 100 more, for a kinect i don't want, and less options of what i can and can't do with my system. as all the evidence pours in from consumer comments, press and general feeling i've what i've seen out there, most people will be thinking the exact same way


what i want to know is, weighing the options for both.. what are y'all seeing from xbox that makes it sooooooooooo much a lock, as better than the ps4
 

blac_da_rappa

All Star
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
1,894
Reputation
480
Daps
4,082
Reppin
O City
I have PS3 and 360 so as long as I can get Metal Gear V " best game of year when it drops watch" im going with PS3 this time.
 

Ineedmoney504

SOHH ICEY...WE EATIN
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
45,542
Reputation
3,872
Daps
102,121
Reppin
SOHH ICEY N.O.
I have PS3 and 360 so as long as I can get Metal Gear V " best game of year when it drops watch" im going with PS3 this time.

:beli: bra they not releasing that shyt on ps3, no 3rd parties not focusing on ps3 or xbox 360 no more, only first dev teams, and im sure they probably closing them up also
 
Top