Ineedmoney504
SOHH ICEY...WE EATIN
probably because it's going to look and run better on ps4, same reason they was playing it on a ps4.
says who, u seem the xbox version?
im sure its going to look the sameprobably because it's going to look and run better on ps4, same reason they was playing it on a ps4.
says who, u seem the xbox version?
im sure its going to look the sameI'm using Ryse purely as a visual statement.
E3 2013: First Details Emerge For Xbox One
Ryse: Son of Rome E3 hands-on - Not a QTE-heavy monster - VideoGamer.com
Ryse: Son of Rome revealed by Crytek at E3 - SlashGear
Gamers will be able to experience the rise of the Roman Empire through the eyes of a Roman soldier, and as expected, the graphics look stunning.
The E3 Xbox Media Briefing: a story told in iPh... | GameZone
But hey, let's not let reality cloud opinion here.![]()
says who, u seem the xbox version?
i sure its going to look the same
if the xbox version were better, they probably would have used it. i don't see the lesser console being able to keep up with the ps4 though.
u sound dumb as fukk 

These Sony Stans are like repubs even proof in there face they will admit nothing
but I'm also interested to see what Xbox is gonna do with the cloud that they keep boasting of and if it's gonna somehow improve graphics/framerate over time. but if I had to put my money on it, just based purely off of specs and history, I'm going with Sony 
Come on man, Sony fans are like republicans, whatever the narrative is, you parrot it and repeat it. During the Xbox vs PS2, even though the OG Xbox was much more powerful than the PS2 than the PS4 is to the Xbox 1, all I heard is bububububu, the games are on PS2. Now that the games are on the Xbox 1, it's all about the power now, people can't make up their minds.
Moreover, since we are at the point of diminishing returns. Do you really think the average person is going to complain with this on launch date?![]()
Or This
![]()
You are truly fooling yourselves if you think most people will care. Most people here can't tell the difference between 2x, 4x, 8x AA or even what kind of AA a game is using, just like they can't tell if a game is 30 or 60 fps.
If you really want strong hardware, you'd join us on in the PC thread. PS4 Teraflops are 1.8? That's cool, but my card in my PC is 3.8 teraflops. All I'm trying to say is just play the games. CPUs are basically the same, bandwidths are the roughly the same and ram is good for caching so that works for streaming so there is a difference there. Complain about DRM, mandatory installs, 24 hours all you want, that's fine, but don't sit here and say that the difference between the two is going to be some epiphany like event, because it's not. If you think so, you need to brace yourselves for reality.

Go check out that Infamous Second Son thread.
![]()
Gif from ACTUAL gameplay too.

That does look pretty good but not better than this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V6UNd1HPYm8
Stupid 3cept

I love sony, but even I can't c/s that statement and I'm a
Last of Us looks better

That does look pretty good but not better than this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V6UNd1HPYm8
Stupid 3cept