Quentin Tarantino says streaming movies 'don't exist in the zeitgeist': 'It's almost like they don't even exist'

KingsOfKings

🍊 𝑳𝒆𝒕'𝒔 𝑻𝒂𝒍𝒌 𝑵𝒖𝒎𝒃𝒆𝒓𝒔 ! 🍊
Joined
Sep 20, 2014
Messages
74,396
Reputation
34,162
Daps
95,324
Quentin Tarantino is stepping away from the big screen after his next project, "The Movie Critic".







Speaking to Deadline in an interview published Thursday, Tarantino suggested that his departure from feature filmmaking is in part because of how streaming services have drastically changed the movie industry.







Tarantino said that he doesn't like working for "diminishing returns," and thinks it's a good time to stop making feature films because he doesn't want to have to make movies for a streaming service.



"And I mean, now is a good time because I mean, what even is a motion picture anyway anymore? Is it just something that they show on Apple? That would be diminishing returns," he said.



The "Once Upon a Time... in Hollywood" director went on to say that movies made for streaming aren't recognizable, and pointed at Ryan Reynolds' work at Netflix as an example.



He said: "I mean, and I'm not picking on anybody, but apparently for Netflix, Ryan Reynolds has made $50 million on this movie and $50 million on that movie and $50 million on the next movie for them. I don't know what any of those movies are. I've never seen them. Have you?"






Reynolds has worked with multiple streamers in recent years, appearing in "6 Underground," "Red Notice," and "The Adam Project" for Netflix, and "Spirited" for Apple TV+.





Tarantino said he doesn't believe streaming movies "exist in the zeitgeist," adding: "It's almost like they don't even exist."



The director said he isn't being "negative" about how the industry has changed, noting that the COVID-19 pandemic has influenced the rise in streaming movies.



"Well, I don't think I'm that negative about it. I think it had been going that way and the pandemic hurried everything along," he noted.



 

rabbid

Superstar
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
7,319
Reputation
1,870
Daps
25,268
It is what it is... his favorite cinema Alamo Drafthouse declared bankruptcy years ago and the average American can't name more than two theatre chains. Its not the glamorous club it used to be. We aint gotta be talking about it all at the same time for it to be worthwhile. Its ok man, just bow out gracefully while Scorsese over here cooking up classics on Apple TV+ :yeshrug:

Either you wanna make movies or you don't. 🤷🏾
 

Instant Classic

All Star
Supporter
Joined
May 31, 2022
Messages
3,999
Reputation
448
Daps
9,839
I couldn't name one classic or even amazing straight to streaming movie.

They're all so formulaic and cookie cutter
Didn't some launch on netflix and Prime, and were nominated for Oscar Awards like Okja, Beast of No Nation, Roma, Marriage Story, Manchester by the Sea, and a a few others. I do agree most straight to streaming films are usually not that good, but services have launched films that scored well among critics. I think the major issue with straight to streaming films is they don't generate much buzz and usually just a flavour of the week and then forgotten
 

AnonymityX1000

Veteran
Joined
Jun 6, 2012
Messages
31,700
Reputation
3,279
Daps
72,249
Reppin
New York
It is what it is... his favorite cinema Alamo Drafthouse declared bankruptcy years ago and the average American can't name more than two theatre chains. Its not the glamorous club it used to be. We aint gotta be talking about it all at the same time for it to be worthwhile. Its ok man, just bow out gracefully while Scorsese over here cooking up classics on Apple TV+ :yeshrug:

Either you wanna make movies or you don't. 🤷🏾
Yeah, Scorsese, Cuarón, Spike and the Coen Brothers catching strays. lol
 

BBG

Eternal
Joined
Aug 4, 2014
Messages
7,482
Reputation
2,602
Daps
30,164
Off the top of my head you got Bright (not a classic, but was very much talked about and that was pre COVID), the tom Clancy movie on prime with Michael b Jordan was great, the Tomorrow War was amazing, HBO Max dropped a bunch of movies day 1 on their app and in theaters at the same time. I mean there's plenty of examples if anyone cares to look but this dude seems to be complaining just to complain.



Make the fukkin movies and shut the fukk up you old bigot. Idgaf how many times you throw Samuel L Jackson in movies, we know you don't actually fw the black community :stopitslime:i feel just as guilty watching this piece of shyt's work as I do the NFL. it's just too good pause
 

drifter

Superstar
Joined
Dec 15, 2013
Messages
6,090
Reputation
3,103
Daps
22,930
Direct to streaming is the new straight to DVD, how that's viewed hasn't changed at all even if the landscape has. As far as it getting lost, people need to be told what to watch and what's a big deal. You communicate that better with TV ads than IG and TikTok and small budget productions can't afford air time, which is why the default exists: If you're on TV you must be big. People will always be more receptive and not being able to scroll past certainly helps

When people are used to over a quarter of a billion dollar budgets to make the best movies, anything less will be cheap feeling whether the viewer can put their finger on it or not.

That's why you'll always need to buy a ticket to watch the best movies or streaming services will figure out ways to pass fees onto their customers if they're serious about box office movies on their platform, whether that's a "Stream same day" fee or something else. Studios need to recoup somehow and so far the mechanism doesn't exist yet with streaming
 

Thavoiceofthevoiceless

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 26, 2019
Messages
45,148
Reputation
6,330
Daps
139,728
Reppin
The Voiceless Realm
Direct to streaming is the new straight to DVD, how that's viewed hasn't changed at all even if the landscape has. As far as it getting lost, people need to be told what to watch and what's a big deal. You communicate that better with TV ads than IG and TikTok and small budget productions can't afford air time, which is why the default exists: If you're on TV you must be big. People will always be more receptive and not being able to scroll past certainly helps

When people are used to over a quarter of a billion dollar budgets to make the best movies, anything less will be cheap feeling whether the viewer can put their finger on it or not.

That's why you'll always need to buy a ticket to watch the best movies or streaming services will figure out ways to pass fees onto their customers if they're serious about box office movies on their platform, whether that's a "Stream same day" fee or something else. Studios need to recoup somehow and so far the mechanism doesn't exist yet with streaming
Disney tried to go that route and got major pushback from it and it's only a matter of time before someone else tries it again as the current system isn't sustainable when it's difficult to judge how much a movie is actually bringing in.
 

O.Red

Veteran
Joined
Jun 1, 2012
Messages
18,547
Reputation
5,712
Daps
74,160
Reppin
NULL
Streamers like Netflix cook the numbers. They'll say "80 million people watched Sandra Bullock starring in..." but the reality is that a lot of people click on a movie and will watch a couple minutes and then say "eh, fukk this"
Actually the opposite tends to be true, and is much worse

A lot of streaming content plays while people do other shyt. Nikkas will put on a new Netflix movie, because it's new, and either enjoy the low effort garbage or have it on as background noise while they do household chores and pay attention to the action scenes or whatever

The reason Netflix cranks out these bullshyt ass movies is because they're being watched, and "watched" to them just means the content needs to be playing

 
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
28,413
Reputation
2,811
Daps
97,500
Reppin
Lwo Lakeset
Didn't some launch on netflix and Prime, and were nominated for Oscar Awards like Okja, Beast of No Nation, Roma, Marriage Story, Manchester by the Sea, and a a few others. I do agree most straight to streaming films are usually not that good, but services have launched films that scored well among critics. I think the major issue with straight to streaming films is they don't generate much buzz and usually just a flavour of the week and then forgotten


Okja is trash as were some of those other films.
My issue isn't with streaming as a delivery method my issue is most of the content they produce is based on algorithms and not art so they are easily forgettable
 
Top