I'm not supporting the claim of acidic state. I was answerin' the question.
If that's his reason for not doin' studies (I'm assumin'), then I won't knock it. Studies are expensive and he would never recoup that cost. .
Too fukking bad.
Everyone has access to food, water & herbs.
My understandin' is that he did prove he cures diseases, just not to the FDA's standard.
Bullshyt. he didn't prove shyt. And fukk a standard...he didn't prove ANY of it.
I was just answerin' another question. His products are just combinations of herbs. But many drugs are only derivatives of herbs, containin' the same compounds. Bein' the professional, tell us why these compounds work as drugs but not the original herb.
Fine. Sell herbs. Don't sell me the cure to shyt you can' prove.
Again, just answerin' a question regardin' Bromide Powder. It's made of of those 2 herbs, and those herbs provide a set of vitamins & minerals. I take those herbs, not to combat any disease, but for a source of iodine as I don't eat iodized salt. And I don't buy them from Dr. Sebi.
No one cares. If you say it does something, lets see it.
The FDA requires double blind tests with a controlled set of circumstances with the only difference between 2 groups bein' one takes a drug, the other doesn't. I'm assumin', but I don't believe anyone has a problem with it except that it's expensive. If you're not gonna make that money back through exclusive rights of your findings, you're simply doin' a very expensive public service.
The FDA requires more than that. I've WORKED in clinical research.
You can't simply have a patient with a disease, give him herbs/drugs, and they end up cured. That doesn't serve as proof accordin' to the FDA.
Again, this isn't even the FDA. This is the NIH, and other government agencies, so you can't even get THAT right.
On top of that, you keep talking about "standard" but you fail to even meet your OWN standards.
What pharmaceutical company invested in studies with no financial interest? Please link us.
The government grants billions of dollars just to fund basic research w/o profit motive. I would know. I've worked on projects that were NOT funded by Pharma companies.
As far as I know, companies that do the R&D for a drug get a certain number of years of exclusive rights. There's financial incentive behind that R&D. I've not researched every drug so I hope you or someone can link us to some that that were researched by a company that didn't have exclusive rights. Not sayin' they don't exist, but I'd imagine it would have to be a charity of some sort. Pharmaceutical companies are in the business of makin' money off drugs. They're not investin' in these drugs for public good
Ya'll know less than 1% of how studies are funded and ignore the other motivations for how research is done, carried out, funded or processed.
Do they still do it? 
