I'm definin' a drug as somethin' created vs grown out of the ground.
Do you know the answer to my question? Why are the derivatives/drugs effective and the herbs not?
"grown out of the ground" is a useless term. Its all natural selection. "plants" from millions of years ago didn't resemble what they are today due to natural selection of the envionrment or survival pressures.
And what you eat today was cultivated by farmers looking for desirable traits thousands of years ago.
I mean these are "technically" natural bananas.
and technically natural corn.
And why do some drugs work as derivatives? Well look at this way, some "herbs" do not have any restorative aspects in them since theres no molecules of interest or they don't cross biologically into areas that are of interest to target protein receptors.
These are artificial sweeteners. It does not get digested by the body because while it LOOKS like glucose, it is not. This is why its marketed as non-caloric...the body literally just passes it.
Sucrose is Glucose+Fructose...that IS digested by the body, requiring heat (calories) and goes onto to be metabolized by the body.
shyt like this is why "herbs" don't "work" per se.
They aren't extracting the key ingredient and trying to make it work, and many times theres nothing actually working.
Its all pseudoscience.
A "drug" is really anything. But only certain "drugs" have desired or interesting effects.
someone cant debunk it.
who had guidelines in the wild
I knew some of this but most of it I had no idea. Now everytime I look at bacon or ribs I'm going to feel sick.


