He can still write for artists. He just did one for Ron Isley a few months ago.They gonna literally fry this nikkah... He dont have a supply and demand for features or no label wanna fukk with him like in 2008 so he's done
He can still write for artists. He just did one for Ron Isley a few months ago.They gonna literally fry this nikkah... He dont have a supply and demand for features or no label wanna fukk with him like in 2008 so he's done
And fukk you mean its medical it shouldn't be public nah fukk that
My criminal record public so drop them med records we need to know who on that shyt, who got that shyt, and who had that shyt
If you ass got STD they need to send out a amber alert on ya puss ass let the locals know you got that body karate
Especially if you got some incurable shyt
fukk that
But damn R Kelly i still cant delete all this fie ass music
fukk nikka


You wouldn’t say this if this were a common pedophile and not r KellyThis is actually not a bad route to go
Ouch got meYou wouldn’t say this if this were a common pedophile and not r Kelly
It’s different in a criminal case, especially communicable diseases. It can be used against you as evidence, and on the other hand his legal team can throw it back on one of the children he fukked and say they infected him so how is the child a victim?I thought medical shyt was confidential, I guess not if you're black
He kept it on VHS and moved it with him at all times because it’s easy to get caught with digital. Hard copies you can destroy or hide. Digital copies get forwarded and sent to other people and the source can be traced back to him. I’m sure his sick friends have passed them around and viewed them when it’s their turn to hide the evidence.I keep hearing all this talk about all the child porn he had and was shooting. So why not just pull that out the tuck? I remember that disgraced Lawyer Avenati talking about tapes all over the country. If the man has tapes and kiddie porn why the reaching with uncredible witnesses. Feds shouldnt even need a witness. You do way more time for kiddie porn i believe then statutory rape,so whats going on?
Sounds like they have nothing honestly. Every story i read about got holes all in it. And you telling me he's just dumping these women willy nilly who could in return put him in jail for life? Hes threatning to release videos of them that would put him in jail too for possessing it.?
He kept it on VHS and moved it with him at all times because it’s easy to get caught with digital. Hard copies you can destroy or hide. Digital copies get forwarded and sent to other people and the source can be traced back to him. I’m sure his sick friends have passed them around and viewed them when it’s their turn to hide the evidence.
I do. I can see him being an anything to get off kind of guy. And there is a segment of pedos who like seeing boys and girls interact, it’s also how they get little girls to let their guard down to be with grown men. I’ve seen true crime stories where men befriended poor little boys and had them drinking and partying with them then used the boys to attract girls. Most of them have sex with the boys and girls together. That’s how you get the girls who are too afraid to be with an older man.he's guilty but the prosecution adding those fags to the list is sensationalism and might actually blow the case
i don't believe R was doing gay shyt![]()
I believe exactly what people have reported and has been recorded on file for this case: he keeps them with him at all times. Until he was locked up I don’t think they were ever out of his possession. If they didn’t destroy them someone is going to fukk up and show them to the wrong person and they’re going to end up online.So he may or may not have videos all over?
I believe exactly what people have reported and has been recorded on file for this case: he keeps them with him at all times. Until he was locked up I don’t think they were ever out of his possession. If they didn’t destroy them someone is going to fukk us and show them to the wrong person and they’re going to end up online.[/QUOTE]
![]()
mehI do. I can see him being an anything to get off kind of guy. And there is a segment of pedos who like seeing boys and girls interact, it’s also how they get little girls to let their guard down to be with grown men. I’ve seen true crime stories where men befriended poor little boys and had them drinking and partying with them then used the boys to attract girls. Most of them have sex with the boys and girls together. That’s how you get the girls who are too afraid to be with an older man.
He's a world renowned singer who's been around since these chicks parents were their age. You really think he has to go that route?I do. I can see him being an anything to get off kind of guy. And there is a segment of pedos who like seeing boys and girls interact, it’s also how they get little girls to let their guard down to be with grown men. I’ve seen true crime stories where men befriended poor little boys and had them drinking and partying with them then used the boys to attract girls. Most of them have sex with the boys and girls together. That’s how you get the girls who are too afraid to be with an older man.
He didn’t have to marry a fifteen year old singer but he did. He is a sexual deviant who is making these choices and pursuing children.He's a world renowned singer who's been around since these chicks parents were their age. You really think he has to go that route?
He didn’t have to marry a fifteen year old singer but he did. He is a sexual deviant who is making these choices and pursuing children.