I never saw a answer to this ?
How much time do u think he deserve?
I would have said 10-15 years.
I never saw a answer to this ?
How much time do u think he deserve?
Yet they didn’t use any of them. And just to put it out there no all of them weren’t underaged do some research. And look and see what he was actually convicted for.You're ignorant as fukk breh, courts have had his child sex tapes for 20 years. The first child sex tape trial started in 2002 but his lawyers successfully stalled the case for 6 years, the video was played in court and and 14 different witnesses testified that he was having sex with a young teen. He only dodged the conviction because he's rich and famous and paid off the victim and her family with a villa in France so that they all refused to testify.
The second child sex tape case came in 2004, when police got another video of R. Kelly having sex with an underage girl. His lawyers fought the charges claiming the search on his home that produced the video had been unlawful, and managed to get the judge to throw the case out of court.
The third child sex tape case is pending in Chicago right now. He's charged with 21 counts of sexual abuse of a minor between the ages of 13 and 16, a grand jury has already seen the tapes and moved to indict. He literally talks about her "14 year old p*ssy" on the tape. A close friend of the victim has already testified that she frequently went to see R. Kelly with the girl on the tape starting when they were 12 years old. An aunt and uncle of the girl confirm that it is her on the tape. The father of the friend has confirmed that the entire neighborhood knew about the girl being on the tape. This shyt is proven, breh.
Not to mention the other pending case where he's accused of prostitution charges for paying a 17-year-old in Minnesota.
And that doesn't even cover all of the women who have testified that R. Kelly abused them when they were girls - they've been calling him out for 26 years. Tiffany Hawkins in the 1990s, Tracy Sampson in 2001, Patrice Jones and Montina Woods in 2002, Jerhonda Pace in 2017. Not to mention of course Aaliyah in 1994 and the girl in the piss tape video in 2002. ALL of them were underage.
You're literally caping for a sex predator who repeatedly hurt children while bytching about "accountability" for sex abuse victims.
I can’t continue with this sex tape narrative since it seems like the courts never seem to use them.

I would have said 10-15 years.

Robert should have stayed in Ethiopia then...Where's Roman Polanski's karma?
As you defend the grown man, R. Kelly...Why you sticking up for another poster. He's a grown man he can speak for himself.
Yep. Would Kells have gotten less years if he was white? Maybe...but the crime is bad enough where that part doesn't even matter.Multiple victims. And he crossed them over state lines to do his shyt
Come on now
Most nikkas in Chicago dont give fuk bout no age of consent
Kellz was just doing regular shyt.

Yep. Would Kells have gotten less years if he was white? Maybe...but the crime is bad enough where that part doesn't even matter.
Cosby was messing with grown women. It all came down to a matter of whether or not they consented.
For R. Kelly, underage girls CANNOT give consent even if that 15-year old child voluntarily takes off her clothes and begs for it...it's the adult's responsibility to walk away.
Boosie would be salty as a mofo... we know he's against that fruit behavior.
R. Kelly being a undercover Peter puffer would have exiled his fanbase. Black women ain't supporting that.
Luther had to hide in the closet in fear that he would lose his fans
They didn't use them. The only footage they used was him screaming at a chick from stealing from him. Where are all these sexual videos he's supposed to have. Remember the hundreds of videos they said they had. Also we would be foolish to not also understand that the vast majority of these women were well over the ages of 21. Look at the last case for what it really was and see what he was really charged/convicted of.I literally just gave you direct examples of the courts using them.![]()
Re
They didn't use them. The only footage they used was him screaming at a chick from stealing from him. Where are all these sexual videos he's supposed to have. Remember the hundreds of videos they said they had. Also we would be foolish to not also understand that the vast majority of these women were well over the ages of 21. Look at the last case for what it really was and see what he was really charged/convicted of.
If they had him dead to rights they wouldn't of needed to get extra creative. If they had those videos that's dead to rights.
If they are really going after crime R Kelly most def wasn't the only criminal involved some of these "victims" are just as criminally culpable.
how can he be over sentenced he got hit with every thing lol