uhm she's not
you know how I know? her stories will stand up to fact checking by anyone
fox would get bodied by a 4 yo with common sense and access to google
so GTF all the way OOH
Last edited:
Rachel Maddow: Rand Paul Is lying. Rand Paul caught lying about past Civil Rights Act objections
- Thread starter ☑︎#VoteDemocrat
- Start date
you know how I know? her stories will stand up to fact checking by anyone
fox would get bodied by a 4 yo with common sense and access to google
so GTF all the way OOH
Just cause she gets paid a lot does not mean she doesn't believe what she says. And RM is far different from Right wing radio and the shills on Fox. Atleast her opinions are based on facts. She doesn't make up facts to fit her narrative.
uhm she's not
you know how I know? her stories will stand up to fact checking by anyone
fox would get bodied by a 4 yo with common sense and access to google
so GTF all the way OOH
http://www.politifact.com/personalities/rachel-maddow/
Your next argument will be that politifact is homophobic, right?
If you don't see the difference between Fox News and Right Wing talk radio, compared to RM, then I don't know what to say to you.
my answer has been edited after I reviewed all her fact checks
I do see the difference. One pushes a narrative that you agree with, and one doesn't. If you think everything Rachel Maddow says is gospel, then I don't know what to say to you.
there is a clear difference
Her show has been on for years and they only fact checked her 22 times and found her to have made false claims 6 times and if you look at the stories they are rather somewhat dubious or soft
then you don't see the difference
I don't even watch RM anymore nor do I agree with everything she says, but there is a clear difference in how RM covers the news compared to Fox News. Trying to equate the two is plainly stupid.
then you don't see the difference
I could go on a right-leaning forum and have the same exact conversation. Partisan is partisan.
American politics
Last edited:
the show has been on for 6 years sh's been fact checked
no no no this is false equivalence but I don't have the patience to rebut you right nowI could go on a right-leaning forum and have the same exact conversation. Partisan is partisan.
American politics
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/365780/msnbcs-alternative-universe-charles-c-w-cooke
maybe later
let's try something simpleI could go on a right-leaning forum and have the same exact conversation. Partisan is partisan.
American politics
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/365780/msnbcs-alternative-universe-charles-c-w-cooke
is she right about Rand Paul? yes or no?
This didn't start from the OP. I never disputed that. My only point is that RM is a pundit, not a journalist. You seem to think otherwise.