Rachel Maddow unappreciation

Dusty Bake Activate

Fukk your corny debates
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
39,077
Reputation
6,048
Daps
132,821
Hmm nah... I've never ever ever ever seen Rachel go at Obama or the Dems for their obvious corruption... Cenk takes it to anybody. I like her but she's very safe.
I agree she doesn't go at Obama like Cenk, but the reporting she does do is more thorough than him. But yeah, the fact that doesn't go at Obama much is kinda bad journalism by omission you could say.
 

Broke Wave

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
18,704
Reputation
4,580
Daps
44,606
Reppin
Open Society Foundation
I agree she doesn't go at Obama like Cenk, but the reporting she does do is more thorough than him. But yeah, the fact that doesn't go at Obama much is kinda bad journalism by omission you could say.

Like that Iranian Press.TV joint goes hella hard... they have some of the best and hard hitting journalism I've seen in years but... it's literally Iranian Press.tv :dead:
 

CASHAPP

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Aug 12, 2012
Messages
26,503
Reputation
-2,474
Daps
48,363
She's up on that Sean Hannity level imo

Nah son. Rachel Maddow's research department game and citing game is top notch. She is much better than loud mouth Chris Matthews and coming off as being full of BS and making statements like "Reagan was a better president than Obama because he ended the Cold War" and giving his own opinions instead of focusing on giving the actual news and citing things like Rachel Maddow does.
 

Prince.Skeletor

Don’t Be Like He-Man
Joined
Jul 5, 2012
Messages
30,798
Reputation
-7,004
Daps
60,308
Reppin
Bucktown
Maddow = Hannity = O'Reilly

Those that disagree only disagree because it's Hannity and O'Reilly for a smaller amount of time.

All of them are horrible and should be thrown out of TV Coverage!
 

Robbie3000

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
32,249
Reputation
6,350
Daps
143,885
Reppin
NULL
Maddow = Hannity = O'Reilly

Those that disagree only disagree because it's Hannity and O'Reilly for a smaller amount of time.

All of them are horrible and should be thrown out of TV Coverage!

:childplease:

Orielly and especially Hannity flat out lie and mislead their audience with zero conscience. Rachel has a POV, but I have never watched her purposely mislead her audience.
 

Domingo Halliburton

Handmade in USA
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
12,616
Reputation
1,380
Daps
15,451
Reppin
Brooklyn Without Limits
:childplease:

Orielly and especially Hannity flat out lie and mislead their audience with zero conscience. Rachel has a POV, but I have never watched her purposely mislead her audience.

there's examples on both sides. you just don't see it because you're cheerleading for the dems.

she let's her bias color her journalism as much as the other guys.
 
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
1,417
Reputation
-165
Daps
811
Reppin
NULL
He's an irrational coward like 99% of other pundits. I literally have not seen a single intellectually honest political commentator on TV. He's more of a coward than a lot of others though.
 

NZA

LOL
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
23,280
Reputation
4,770
Daps
59,739
Reppin
Gang violence...
the only real strike against her is that she is snarky to republican political beliefs and conduct

other than that, she is about as well researched and principled as one can get in primetime cable news. there is no good equivalence to draw on fox with her, but i guess megyn kelly is lighter on the bullshyt than the average fox primetime talent though nowhere near as deep in wonkery as rachel.
 

NkrumahWasRight Is Wrong

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
46,332
Reputation
5,946
Daps
94,038
Reppin
Uncertain grounds
Shes sharp and very smart, probably smarter than her counterparts across the reporting aisle, but shes also clearly there to combat their rhetoric directly and subtly brainwash people (as they are).
 
Joined
Jan 10, 2013
Messages
1,337
Reputation
220
Daps
2,035
Well-researched, very thorough and can be entertaining although she can as someone said be a bit snarky. It's clearly opinion though, she makes that clear and you'd have to be an idiot to not make that distinction. To say she doesn't ever attack Obama also is just being dishonest too.
 
Top