Racist Sanders Cac exposes himself.

[DeadandGone14]

No the CAC is just calling out Brooker who exposed himself by voting against an amendment that would allow people to buy cheaper medication overseas. What makes this worse is he was paid by pharma companies. He basically went against his own constituents and he a fukk boy for doing that

 

[Saiyajin]

Because hes a frontrunner for the 2020 nomination. Im not spilling no tears for him, he wants the limelight, let him have it and everything that comes with it. Im supposed to give a fukk cause a Cac drags him over a yes vote to big pharma?

theres a lot of sanders support on here with people thinking Sanders will bring good change

this thread is an example of the reality that Sanders and "Progressives" are no different than Republicans or any other Cac

they all care about their OWN self interest ONLY. Not first, but ONLY.

This CAC literally repeated the same thing Tim Cotton said. On opposite ends of the political specturm but somehow both these cacs agree that Booker protesting against a racist piece of garbage is opportunism. Thats not a coincidence. Every white sanders supporter deep down sympathizes with Sessions over Booker i promise you


The point of this thread was just further proof of what Malcolm X has been saying. That this political spectrum is all a facade, these cacs bicker over petty issues but will come together and agree that the only option to ever be considered is one that put fellow pigskins at an advantage

 

[Saiyajin]

No the CAC is just calling out Brooker who exposed himself by voting against an amendment that would allow people to buy cheaper medication overseas. What makes this worse is he was paid by pharma companies. He basically went against his own constituents and he a fukk boy for doing that

even if he voted for it, it still wouldnt have passed but the difference is no one would ever hear about it

lemme ask you this, do you know the a single name from the democrats that voted against the bill Obama proposed for the exact same thing? Obama proposed a Drug pricing plan in 2016 and the same thing happened, a bunch of democrats voted against it and it didnt pass

theres a democrat that voted against this that is a much bigger name than Booker, received MUCH more than Booker from Big Pharma, and has been receiving checks from big Pharma that were more than 300k every year since 1989

where was the outrage then?? no one heard about it no one cared at all, youd think these cacs would have an issue then but they didnt, because theres no hypocrite like a white liberal

these cacs are so fukking blatant and they are getting away with it lmao wow

 

[B!tchuoffendingme]

theres a lot of sanders support on here with people thinking Sanders will bring good change

this thread is an example of the reality that Sanders and "Progressives" are no different than Republicans or any other Cac

they all care about their OWN self interest ONLY. Not first, but ONLY.

This CAC literally repeated the same thing Tim Cotton said. On opposite ends of the political specturm but somehow both these cacs agree that Booker protesting against a racist piece of garbage is opportunism. Thats not a coincidence. Every white sanders supporter deep down sympathizes with Sessions over Booker i promise you


The point of this thread was just further proof of what Malcolm X has been saying. That this political spectrum is all a facade, these cacs bicker over petty issues but will come together and agree that the only option to ever be considered is one that put fellow pigskins at an advantage

Fair enough.

 

[Saiyajin]

Fair enough.

i shouldve made it clearer that I am completely against this lobbying bribery bullshyt in all forms

the focus was supposed to be on the cac referring to Booker's objection to Sessions as opportunism

only included the first tweet to include context because if i left it out itd be misleading af and we dont need to resort to petty tactics when the Truth always stands firmly on its own

 

[DeadandGone14]

even if he voted for it, it still wouldnt have passed but the difference is no one would ever hear about it

lemme ask you this, do you know the a single name from the democrats that voted against the bill Obama proposed for the exact same thing? Obama proposed a Drug pricing plan in 2016 and the same thing happened, a bunch of democrats voted against it and it didnt pass

theres a democrat that voted against this that is a much bigger name than Booker, received MUCH more than Booker from Big Pharma, and has been receiving checks from big Pharma that were more than 300k every year since 1989

where was the outrage then?? no one heard about it no one cared at all, youd think these cacs would have an issue then but they didnt, because theres no hypocrite like a white liberal

these cacs are so fukking blatant and they are getting away with it lmao wow

I think what you are saying is fair. I mis read your post as I thought you were attacking the person just because he called out Cory Booker for his vote. Not defending the cac but I think his attack on booker was because he has become well known recently. The cac comment about Booker "opportunism" objection of sessions doesn't sit well with me and shouldn't sit well with anyone that is black. But you are right,White liberals have never been our friends and never truly will. Dealing with white liberals is like a double edge sword. They will support you to some extent but never completely to break the cycle. Compared to white conservatives who will do everything to make sure we are a second class citizen.

 

[dh86]

I regret clicking on this.

 

[dh86]

i shouldve made it clearer that I am completely against this lobbying bribery bullshyt in all forms

the focus was supposed to be on the cac referring to Booker's objection to Sessions as opportunism

only included the first tweet to include context because if i left it out itd be misleading af and we dont need to resort to petty tactics when the Truth always stands firmly on its own

Racist isnt a trivial term to be whored out whenever someone black is criticized. He clearly was referring large amounts of money solicited by Sen. Booker from Big Pharna, while playing social justice warrior as 'opportunism'. That term racist shouldnt have been on this thread.

 

[Saiyajin]

Racist isnt a trivial term to be whored out whenever someone black is criticized. He clearly was referring large amounts of money solicited by Sen. Booker from Big Pharna as 'oppurtunism'. That term racist shouldnt have been on this thread.

i disagree with everything you said

but i do agree racist shouldnt have been used because calling a white person racist is truly the definition of a redundant statement

 

[JahFocus CS]

Stupid ass thread.

@Kotal Kahn you're starting to look funny in the light like Napoleon trying to paint progressivism and leftism as racist. That's some agent disinformation bullshyt.

 

[dh86]

even if he voted for it, it still wouldnt have passed but the difference is no one would ever hear about it

lemme ask you this, do you know the a single name from the democrats that voted against the bill Obama proposed for the exact same thing? Obama proposed a Drug pricing plan in 2016 and the same thing happened, a bunch of democrats voted against it and it didnt pass

theres a democrat that voted against this that is a much bigger name than Booker, received MUCH more than Booker from Big Pharma, and has been receiving checks from big Pharma that were more than 300k every year since 1989

where was the outrage then?? no one heard about it no one cared at all, youd think these cacs would have an issue then but they didnt, because theres no hypocrite like a white liberal

these cacs are so fukking blatant and they are getting away with it lmao wow

Why wont you just tell us, instead of asking us?

 

[dh86]

Stupid ass thread.

@Kotal Kahn you're starting to look funny in the light like Napoleon trying to paint progressivism and leftism as racist. That's some agent disinformation bullshyt.

According to him, 13 democrats voting against a Democrat's bill doesnt affect the outcome when theres 54 Republicans and 44 (46) Democrats, and the vote failed 52-46. Ooookay.

 

[AlainLocke]

Of course White liberals and progressives are self-interested...

But Corey Booker is a POS...

 

[Saiyajin]

Stupid ass thread.

@Kotal Kahn you're starting to look funny in the light like Napoleon trying to paint progressivism and leftism as racist. That's some agent disinformation bullshyt.

progressivism and leftism ideology are anti-racist by definition, this post is about self proclaimed Progressives who are really hypocrites and lmao my intentions arent some agent shyt its just because I find it amazing that Malcolm X was spot on with everything he said about this topic

Look at this example on its own and tell me is this really progressiveism? to pick and choose only the issues that only affect one personally sounds like the opposite of progressivism

and to have no issue with a man like sessions as AG makes it even more blatant which is why i found it threadworthy, straight up hypocrisy

napolean is a fakkit id die before i associate myself with him, his reasons for this shyt are probably retarded shyt i have no idea what goes on in his pea brain

im just doing this to show yet again, the GOAT was right all along. as if there was ever any doubt

 

[Danktoker94]

Booker been an opputunist and fairy