Rand Paul Is Not A Libertarian

Robbie3000

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
32,843
Reputation
6,526
Daps
146,553
Reppin
NULL
exactly, he's better than most, and? is that a bad thing?

i dont really see what the big deal is cuz im realistic

anybody with a half a brain knows that rand is going to have to compromise his libertarianism if he wants to get the nomination, the only question is how far is he going to go

demanding that rand paul be strictly libertarian is like demanding that young hussein be pro black (or worse socialist) back in 07

:pachaha:

If he is going this far right just to get the nomination, how much heart do you think he will have to push what are essentially liberal policies (decriminalization of drugs and sentencing reform)?

:mjlol:
 

theworldismine13

God Emperor of SOHH
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
22,799
Reputation
570
Daps
22,758
Reppin
Arrakis
If hes going to compromise this much he might as well be a fukking full blown Bible Belt conservative.

If hes willing to do a complete philosophical 180 to pursue political ambitions, fukk him. The last thing we need is another politician who puts their career ahead of their convictions.

And these yellow back zero integrity clowns are who you want us to give our votes to unconditionally :mjlol:

Slow down buddy, here you go again with your typical retarded bullshyt, how the fuk do you go from me saying that black people should split our votes to me saying you should vote for anybody unconditionally, are you retarded? Im saying the opposite of giving your vote unconditionally

Second of all I've said I'm an independent, I never said I'm against the "Bible Belt conservative" don't confuse your political leanings with mine, I'm reading the article posted and the only position that bothers me is his abortion stance, the other positions I pretty much agree with or don't have a problem with

I wasn't aware that I'm suppose to be the defender of northeastern liberalism, or that liberalism is the golden standard to measure politicians with
 
Last edited:

theworldismine13

God Emperor of SOHH
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
22,799
Reputation
570
Daps
22,758
Reppin
Arrakis
:pachaha:

If he is going this far right just to get the nomination, how much heart do you think he will have to push what are essentially liberal policies (decriminalization of drugs and sentencing reform)?

:mjlol:

Decriminalization and drug sentencing reform are not liberal policies, the prison industrial complex and the drug war was created by both liberals and conservatives, including bill Clinton and joe biden

So your solution to the war on drugs is to vote for the wife of the man that created the prison industrial complex? :mjlol:
 

Jello Biafra

A true friend stabs you in the front
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
46,184
Reputation
4,958
Daps
120,924
Reppin
Behind You
Aside from him saying he is for legalization of weed and claiming to be a non-interventionist, there are very few Libertarian qualities about Rand Paul.
That is why I had to laugh at some talking heads on the radio this morning saying some dumb shyt about how Libertarian voters will be torn between Paul and Ted Cruz.
Neither of those dudes are Libertarian.
 

Billy Hoyle

All Star
Joined
Dec 5, 2014
Messages
974
Reputation
140
Daps
2,971
Reppin
Auburn
I have no idea how a minority could be a libertarian. :wow:

Libertarianism gives wealth that much more power. You can pretty much do whatever the fukk you want if you have enough wealth in that system. Corporations would become the new government in that system and they sure as fukk don't care about the welfare of anything but their shareholders.

In actuality, no one's a fukking libertarian because it's a stupid ideology:francis:. Most of the people who say they're libertarian are fiscal conservatives and social liberals. That doesn't make you a libertarian. That just means you're disenfranchised with the party you used to consider your own.

There are so many young white Republicans who claim to be libertarian because they're actually liberal and won't admit it to themselves. And vice versa with young black Democrats.
:sas2:
 

Robbie3000

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
32,843
Reputation
6,526
Daps
146,553
Reppin
NULL
Decriminalization and drug sentencing reform are not liberal policies, the prison industrial complex and the drug war was created by both liberals and conservatives, including bill Clinton and joe biden

So your solution to the war on drugs is to vote for the wife of the man that created the prison industrial complex? :mjlol:

:comeon: They fall on the liberal end of the spectrum even if they are positions held by Libertarians and Clinton's triangulation attempts not withstanding. The Republicans have always been known as the party of law and order.

Hilary is not my candidate, i'm still hoping Elizabeth Warren runs.
 

superunknown23

Superstar
Joined
May 14, 2012
Messages
7,867
Reputation
1,230
Daps
23,434
Reppin
NULL
What principles? He always retreats when he gets exposed... The mask eventually falls off.
We saw how quickly he backed off after declaring his opposition to the Civil Rights Act of 1964:mjpls:
 

theworldismine13

God Emperor of SOHH
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
22,799
Reputation
570
Daps
22,758
Reppin
Arrakis
:comeon: They fall on the liberal end of the spectrum even if they are positions held by Libertarians and Clinton's triangulation attempts not withstanding. The Republicans have always been known as the party of law and order.

Hilary is not my candidate, i'm still hoping Elizabeth Warren runs.

but in the end you will end up voting for hillary, who is actually more of hawk than rand paul or obama, more of a wall street shill than obama, who will obviously continue the triangulation strategy, who spent half her time during the primaries of 08 pandering to poor racist white people and whose husband bill "obama should have been getting us coffee" clinton thought barry was to uppity and who im not even sure has ever said anything about the prison industrial complex or ending the drug war (but im sure we can trust her to do something about it cuz she is one of dem good white folk...............unless of course she gets attacked for being weak on crime....)

if anything this shows why its important for black people to split our votes, in a general election between rand and hillary, hillary wont be forced to go to extremes because she wont be attacked for being soft on crime and you have both parties trying to appeal to black people
 
Last edited:

tru_m.a.c

IC veteran
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
31,669
Reputation
6,972
Daps
91,551
Reppin
Gaithersburg, MD via Queens/LI
exactly, he's better than most, and? is that a bad thing?

i dont really see what the big deal is cuz im realistic

anybody with a half a brain knows that rand is going to have to compromise his libertarianism if he wants to get the nomination, the only question is how far is he going to go

demanding that rand paul be strictly libertarian is like demanding that young hussein be pro black (or worse socialist) back in 07

So wouldn't that just make him the equivalent of the establishment republican party.......
 

theworldismine13

God Emperor of SOHH
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
22,799
Reputation
570
Daps
22,758
Reppin
Arrakis
So wouldn't that just make him the equivalent of the establishment republican party.......

yeah, rand paul has shifted his positions to be more in line with mainstream repblicans...........and?

maybe im getting old and cynical, but im not expecting any pure candidate to come out of any party, its a given that the mainstream parties will make outsiders conform, the only issue is how much
 

superunknown23

Superstar
Joined
May 14, 2012
Messages
7,867
Reputation
1,230
Daps
23,434
Reppin
NULL
Cape for conservative cacs posing as "compassionate libertarians", breh:mjlol:

Also, it's funny how conservatives these days keep saying that "the system is broken", "both parties are the same", "both suck"... Yet after feigning disgust, they're always the first to cast their ballot for the GOP (religiously, year after year).
That tactic worked like a charm in the 2010 and 2014 midterms.
Too bad for them the turnout won't be 35 percent again next year:jawalrus:
 

ghostwriterx

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
6,905
Reputation
811
Daps
14,621
exactly, he's better than most, and? is that a bad thing?

i dont really see what the big deal is cuz im realistic
Didn't say that was a bad thing.

anybody with a half a brain knows that rand is going to have to compromise his libertarianism if he wants to get the nomination, the only question is how far is he going to go
Against abortion.
Against gay marriage.
Against legalization of marijuana.
For increased defense spending.
No problem with the drone policy on foreign soil.
Supports imprisonment of people who listen to radical speeches.

Those aren't "compromises".
As the article points out those things are directly in opposition to libertarian ideology.
How exactly is he libertarian?

demanding that rand paul be strictly libertarian is like demanding that young hussein be pro black (or worse socialist) back in 07
What a ridiculous comparison. When did Obama state or imply he was a socialist? And what policy did he support/introduce that was decidedly anti-black?
 

theworldismine13

God Emperor of SOHH
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
22,799
Reputation
570
Daps
22,758
Reppin
Arrakis
Didn't say that was a bad thing.


Against abortion.
Against gay marriage.
Against legalization of marijuana.
For increased defense spending.
No problem with the drone policy on foreign soil.
Supports imprisonment of people who listen to radical speeches.

Those aren't "compromises".
As the article points out those things are directly in opposition to libertarian ideology.
How exactly is he libertarian?
and for the record, ive never said im a libertarian, and i never said im voting for rand paul becuase he's a libertarian

and ive never said im a liberal either, so that is not the measuring stick im using

i disgaree with his position on abortion, im ambivalent about gay mariage, i honestly dont give a fuk either way what happens with that issue, im for increasing defense spending, i have no problem with drones being used on foreign soil i think they should be used more, its not clear to me what exactly the whole radical speech thing is about



What a ridiculous comparison. When did Obama state or imply he was a socialist? And what policy did he support/introduce that was decidedly anti-black?
well the best example is jeremiah wright, now personally i didnt have a problem with anything jeremiah wright said and neither did most black people, but im aware enough that it would be silly to demand that obama stand by jeremiah wright or farakkhan or "pro black" people and then also say he should go for the nomination of a mainstream party, thats just one example

if you didnt realize the compromises and policy shifts obama made to get the nomination you are a very naive person

like obama, it was very obvious that rand would have to back off some of the things hes said in the past if he was going to go for the nomination, thats all i was saying
 

ghostwriterx

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
6,905
Reputation
811
Daps
14,621
and for the record, ive never said im a libertarian, and i never said im voting for rand paul becuase he's a libertarian

and ive never said im a liberal either, so that is not the measuring stick im using

i disgaree with his position on abortion, im ambivalent about gay mariage, i honestly dont give a fuk either way what happens with that issue, im for increasing defense spending, i have no problem with drones being used on foreign soil i think they should be used more, its not clear to me what exactly the whole radical speech thing is about




well the best example is jeremiah wright, now personally i didnt have a problem with anything jeremiah wright said and neither did most black people, but im aware enough that it would be silly to demand that obama stand by jeremiah wright or farakkhan or "pro black" people and then also say he should go for the nomination of a mainstream party, thats just one example

if you didnt realize the compromises and policy shifts obama made to get the nomination you are a very naive person

like obama, it was very obvious that rand would have to back off some of the things hes said in the past if he was going to go for the nomination, thats all i was saying

I get that, but it does call into question what exactly he's going to do once he gets into office. If he caters to the far right to get the nomination have to assume he's going to continue to do so once in office. Its hard to see what currently makes him different from the rest of the republican party and hoping he's just bullsh*ttin right now seems overly optimistic.

This strategy may get him the nomination, but unclear it will get him the independents he will need in a general election.
 
Top