Why would the Lakers do that?fukk it, Clarkson and nance for Ryan Anderson![]()
Why would the Lakers do that?fukk it, Clarkson and nance for Ryan Anderson![]()


He's a winning player with no ego and won't command big bucks when his deal is up. Dude could go just about anywhere and contribute.Low ceiling, he's already 25 and he's an RFA next year

He's a winning player with no ego and won't command big bucks when his deal is up. Dude could go just about anywhere and contribute.

As the lone Nance stan on the board, I'll dispute this. He tends to be in the right place at the right time; great finisher around the rim; gets his hands in passing lanes and loose balls (his steal rates are really good); CAN hit mid-range jumpers, but is taking less this year for some reason; sets good screens.Larry Nance is kinda trash. He been in the league for a minute and doesn't do shyt he couldn't do his rookie year.
Can't defend, rebounding is nothing special, can't shoot that well... he's not even that great offball so its not like he's eating all game. If he can't get numbers in LA, where's he gonna do it at? Nobody needs a poor man's Kenneth Faried.
It's crazy how Randle has improved so much and Nance has pretty much stayed still.
I didn't say he's a franchise player, just a winning player. If he went to Houston, Cleveland, Boston, Toronto, etc., he'd make them better and fit right in. He's a classic "does all the little things" type of player.He's never been on a winning team, or a team over .500. How is he a winning player?
His market is going to be determined by whoever signs first at his position. You don't have a marquee player to command big money(see: Kent Bazemore, Timofey Mozgov, Kelly Olynyk, James Johnson), the market is going to be determine how much he gets. If there's a precedent for the Amir Johnsons, James Johnson and Kelly Olynyk to make $12-15 mil a year, then Larry is not that far behind.