Randle, Clarkson, Deng and Nance on trading block per espn

Darealtwo1

Veteran
WOAT
Joined
Jan 9, 2014
Messages
26,709
Reputation
-9,031
Daps
87,423
Damn....Clarkson bout to lose all his LA bytches :mjlol:

That's the only thing he loved :russ:


edit: fukked I forgot lose lol
 
Last edited:

42 Monks

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Feb 20, 2014
Messages
62,501
Reputation
11,294
Daps
228,364
Reppin
Carolina
Larry Nance is kinda trash. He been in the league for a minute and doesn't do shyt he couldn't do his rookie year.

Can't defend, rebounding is nothing special, can't shoot that well... he's not even that great offball so its not like he's eating all game. If he can't get numbers in LA, where's he gonna do it at? Nobody needs a poor man's Kenneth Faried.

It's crazy how Randle has improved so much and Nance has pretty much stayed still.
 

trick

sleeping
Supporter
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
24,410
Reputation
5,579
Daps
74,742
He's a winning player with no ego and won't command big bucks when his deal is up. Dude could go just about anywhere and contribute.

He's never been on a winning team, or a team over .500. How is he a winning player?

His market is going to be determined by whoever signs first at his position. You don't have a marquee player to command big money(see: Kent Bazemore, Timofey Mozgov, Kelly Olynyk, James Johnson), the market is going to be determine how much he gets. If there's a precedent for the Amir Johnsons, James Johnson and Kelly Olynyk to make $12-15 mil a year, then Larry is not that far behind.
 

Regular_P

Just end the season.
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
84,087
Reputation
11,282
Daps
226,029
Larry Nance is kinda trash. He been in the league for a minute and doesn't do shyt he couldn't do his rookie year.

Can't defend, rebounding is nothing special, can't shoot that well... he's not even that great offball so its not like he's eating all game. If he can't get numbers in LA, where's he gonna do it at? Nobody needs a poor man's Kenneth Faried.

It's crazy how Randle has improved so much and Nance has pretty much stayed still.
As the lone Nance stan on the board, I'll dispute this. He tends to be in the right place at the right time; great finisher around the rim; gets his hands in passing lanes and loose balls (his steal rates are really good); CAN hit mid-range jumpers, but is taking less this year for some reason; sets good screens.

LA generally plays better when he's on the court. I'm not one for advanced stats, but their best lineups are when he's on the floor. Their offensive/defensive ratings with him on the floor are 123.3/106.4, which is BY FAR the best on the squad. No one else is even close.

I'm not saying he's THE reason for those splits, but he makes a difference.
 

Regular_P

Just end the season.
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
84,087
Reputation
11,282
Daps
226,029
He's never been on a winning team, or a team over .500. How is he a winning player?

His market is going to be determined by whoever signs first at his position. You don't have a marquee player to command big money(see: Kent Bazemore, Timofey Mozgov, Kelly Olynyk, James Johnson), the market is going to be determine how much he gets. If there's a precedent for the Amir Johnsons, James Johnson and Kelly Olynyk to make $12-15 mil a year, then Larry is not that far behind.
I didn't say he's a franchise player, just a winning player. If he went to Houston, Cleveland, Boston, Toronto, etc., he'd make them better and fit right in. He's a classic "does all the little things" type of player.
 
Top