Owens looking fast here
TO was taking 10 yard slants 80 yards for scores. He has speed and i don't remember him getting run down in the open field
Randy Moss vs. Terrell Owens
- Thread starter DosCadenaz
- Start date
Owens looking fast here
TO was taking 10 yard slants 80 yards for scores. He has speed and i don't remember him getting run down in the open field
Owens breaking 2 tackles going 70 yards leaving everyone in the dust
Receivers Moss, Owens take different routes to greatness - The Boston Globe
Rod Woodson saying that Randy has better hands then TO and at end of article when pressed the says he would rather cover Owens than Moss.
Rod Woodson saying that Randy has better hands then TO and at end of article when pressed the says he would rather cover Owens than Moss.
Copy Ninja
Superstar
Not saying Owens wasn't a focal point of some defenses, but no other receiver, has demanded as much from defenses as Moss. After his first game where he destroyed that secondary, every single game, every single play, he had a guy over the top. You can't say that same shyt for any WR even Jerry Rice.
Yeah Owens was a better blocker, route runner, but shiet, that's like saying since Emmit was a better pass catcher, and knew how to follow his blocks better therefore he was a better RB than Barry. shyt is silly.
Not saying Owens wasn't a focal point of some defenses, but no other receiver, has demanded as much from defenses as Moss. After his first game where he destroyed that secondary, every single game, every single play, he had a guy over the top. You can't say that same shyt for any WR even Jerry Rice.
Yeah Owens was a better blocker, route runner, but shiet, that's like saying since Emmit was a better pass catcher, and knew how to follow his blocks better therefore he was a better RB than Barry. shyt is silly.
Moss and Sanders are game breakers, cheat codes, that's fair. Sanders has the most yards loss behind the line of scrimmage though. That can be a function of both his running style and at times a weaker offensive line.
ODB might take that when it's all said and done.
There is no real significant difference in number of attempts between the TO offenses and the moss offenses to call one "pass happy" not the others.
For example
The 2000 49ers had 583 overall pass attempts while the 2007 patriots had 586, the 1998 Vikings had 533
Tony D'Amato
It's all about the inches
TO was a track guy breh. He ran a 4.4 w/ da Cowboys. Moss was a 4.2 guy, but his playoff stats look funny in da light. U put a safety deep enough amd u could contain him. TO had secondarys bouncin off him in his prime. N1ggaz done forgot about Eldorado.
Piff Tannen
Superstar
that's my fav NFL WRTO was a track guy breh. He ran a 4.4 w/ da Cowboys. Moss was a 4.2 guy, but his playoff stats look funny in da light. U put a safety deep enough amd u could contain him. TO had secondarysbouncin off him in his prime. N1ggaz done forgot about Eldorado.
Eldorado hawking and outrunning teammates and defenders
Last edited:
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2013
- Messages
- 18,827
- Reputation
- 2,092
- Daps
- 44,428
- Reppin
- Ruff Raleigh, North Carolina
Steve smith
Mantis Toboggan M.D.
Drink wolf cola
And he finished with 4 for the game. Owens did it against a playoff team, Moss did it against a team that hasn't been to the playoffs since Pokemon yellow version was the hottest video game. Why does nobody seem to remember how large a portion of new England's offensive stats that year were a product of running up the score/stat padding against bad teams when the game was already decided? Throwing deep when up 35-0 in the fourth quarter and going for it on 4th down while up 20+ with 5 minutes to go type shyt.
