Ranking the NBA's 3-peaters

[mamba]

Ranking the NBA's 3-Peaters | Bleacher Report

The 1995-96 Chicago Bulls went 72-10, establishing a record for regular-season dominance that has withstood the test of nearly the next two decades. Over the next two years, Michael Jordan led his team to 69 wins and then another 62.

Can you imagine what we'd think of this stretch if the Bulls hadn't dropped the last two games of the 1996-97 regular season and had won a combined 143 games in two go-rounds?

1. Chicago Bulls (96-98)
2. Boston Celtics (59-66)
3. Chicago Bulls (91-93)
4. LA Lakers (00-02)
5. Miami Heat (12-14) assuming they win
6. Minneapolis Lakers (52-54)

 

[Jplaya2023]

they should rank on atleast winning 2 straight and have it from 1980-now. To hard to quantify the 50's lakers and the 60's celtics

 

[Illuminatos]

Lol @ the 50-60s Celtics being #2.

 

[ItzDaKiing]

It's the 3 peat bulls then the lakers and then whoever else after that

 

[Illuminatos]

Bulls
Lakers
Heat
Celics
Minneapolis Lakers

 

[Swagnificent]

why are nikkas even talking about the 50s celtics or Minneapolis lakers. no one living today saw them play. only real 3peaters were the 90s Bulls and 00s Lakers. thats it.

 

[True Weltch Media]

Didn't the celtics play in a league with like 8 teams?

 

[FTBS]

at including a squad that hasn't even won 3 yet. They couldn't wait til the Finals were over?

I think the first 3peat Bulls were actually better than the 2nd 3peat Bulls. The league was just weaker in the late 90s.

 

[FAH1223]

are they trynna jinx the Heat?

 

[Higher Tech]

are they trynna jinx the Heat?

Hopefully it works

 

[VladTheImpaler]

why are nikkas even talking about the 50s celtics or Minneapolis lakers. no one living today saw them play. only real 3peaters were the 90s Bulls and 00s Lakers. thats it.

what is wrong with this bamma's math?

 

[Amulet of Immortality]

Nobody should count the NBA before 1985. fukk outta here with these weak ass Negroes and Caucasians that yall go back in history to try and use as legit sources when the league was whack back then.

 

[Carlos Huerta]

at including a squad that hasn't even won 3 yet. They couldn't wait til the Finals were over?

I think the first 3peat Bulls were actually better than the 2nd 3peat Bulls. The league was just weaker in the late 90s.

Why do you think that?

 

[Carlos Huerta]

what is wrong with this bammas math?

 

[Carlos Huerta]

Nobody should count the NBA before 1985. fukk outta here with these weak ass Negroes and Caucasians that yall go back in history to try and use as legit sources when the league was whack back then.

'85 now?

This place gets more interesting by the day