Ratings don't matter in the sense of trying to analyze .1 differences by quarter-hours that raise and lower arbitrarily, particularly when you're going into the whole thing with a premeditated bias upon which you base all your irrelevant arguments.
Man stop this shyt. Don't start this on here. I listened to Observer he said Cena was a big factor, you are 100% wrong no matter what you think.
Don't start what on here? Common sense? Basic logic? Arguments with a modicum of intelligence beyond biased stanning of whatever wrestler you're a fan of?
The product's been terrible pretty much since the week after Wrestlemania. That's when I stopped watching and more and more people are tuning out weekly. Again, it's not about WHO'S on the show, it's about what they're doing. They ruined any excitement Punk brought. Brock's gone and buried. There's nothing exciting happening. Your love for Cena is irrelevant to the discussion.Well the quote you quoted was about Punk being the scapegoat and then you defended Punk and that way of thinking. If anything it wasn't about Punk, he was barely on as no one cares about him and have moved on. The show was about Big Show, if possible people care about him less than Punk so the rating reflects that. No Cena also killed it. Nothing for the people to look forward to.
Also you have used the word modicum enough, it's in all of your posts. We get it, you can use an online thesaurus.
- me
Okay let's come together as one TSC and marvel at the drawing power of Real Life cac feuds.
No Lesnar, No Dice. Give the man wat he wants. Think about it, We go frm the shear awesomeness af lesnar brutalizing WWE employees to..... Big Show
