This what it has come to breh breh? You post stats but now when other stats fly in your face you like "But that was different"
Remember when the Coli thought Jabari Parker > Julius Randle?
- Thread starter CantStop
- Start date
- Status
This what it has come to breh breh? You post stats but now when other stats fly in your face you like "But that was different"
My foot on your neck has you resorting to ad hominem once again. You see this here @I.AM.PIFF
I only see his foot on your neck, beloved
12/10/3 in only 22 mins for young JuBo after a few missed games, meanwhile the Bucks beat easily the Cavs but cheese boy bari still has a negative -/+
Bucks got 8 wins, right?
Lets go over Parker's stats in those games:
5/11 for 14 points
7/14 for 21 points
11/16 for 27 points
6/14 for 19 points
5/16 for 16 points
8/17 for 22 points
3/8 for 9 points
7/17 for 18 points
He only has 3 20 point games in Bucks wins.
But wait there's more, in 2 of three of those 20 point games he had was a MINUS on the court. This "2nd option" is out here giving up more than he puts up pretty much every time out.
See now, I know when your neck is getting sore when you start accusing me of shyt I never posted.You're the master of duck tales. How you travel overseas and watch 90% of all NBA games while also missing half the season?
They're about to pull the blame Kidd card like it's Pokémon. BlameKiddachu
He's bringing up stats that he can't even provide the right context to, and gets all in his feelings when those stats are used against him.I only see his foot on your neck, beloved
12/10/3 in only 22 mins for young JuBo after a few missed games, meanwhile the Bucks beat easily the Cavs but cheese boy bari still has a negative -/+
His neck ain't looking too good at the moment.
Even Dracula looking at his neck like
I already know @Gil Scott-Heroin's next move. He will tell me that +/- doesn't matter, it's oudated, and I don't watch games. I watched today, he was minus on the court, and he was awful for most of the game with the majority of his production replaceable by other players as he a lot of it was either fast break points(that Giannis can setup for anyone) or gimmes underneath the hoop(and since Randle gets these same type of gimmes and he calls them garbage points/stats I guess Parker's shouldn't count either).
He only has one comeback "you don't watch games" and when it doesn't apply he ain't got shyt.
He's bringing up stats that he can't even provide the right context to, and gets all in his feelings when those stats are used against him.
His neck ain't looking too good at the moment.
Even Dracula looking at his neck like
At least he ain't bringing up made-up stats like assists per minute handling the ball
What a poor attempt, here are his stats in wins -
18.3ppg 5.4rpg 2.6apg 1.3spg
He's shooting 46% in those games, and their wins are basically dependant on whether or not he's hitting the three that night or not. When they win he shoots 44% from three on 3.3 attempts per game, when they lose he shoots 30% from three on 2.9 attempts. When they lose he scores more on a lower percentage and can't hit the three as a result.
You tried to use the shooting percentages only without showing his full stats and what he's shooting from three. You did all that research for the last 20-30 mins to come back with some BS
That's because he can't contextualize anything that happens outside of a box score.At least he ain't bringing up made-up stats like assists per minute handling the ball
What a poor attempt, here are his stats in wins -
18.3ppg 5.4rpg 2.6apg 1.3spg
He's shooting 46% in those games, and their wins are basically dependant on whether or not he's hitting the three that night or not. When they win he shoots 44% from three on 3.3 attempts per game, when they lose he shoots 30% from three on 2.9 attempts. When they lose he scores more on a lower percentage and can't hit the three as a result.
You tried to use the shooting percentages only without showing his full stats and what he's shooting from three. You did all that research for the last 20-30 mins to come back with some BS
That took me about 2 minutes breh, if I wanted to waste some real time with this I would also have to spend a few hours digging some 6 foot hole graves for you to lie in. Parker just ain't worth that amount of effort though.
Lets talk statistics though, you know what an outlier is, right? That 11/17 shooting night was an outlier for his performances in wins, if you remove that and make the statistics look more true to what he normally does in wins then his PPG is: 17 PPG on 42.2% shooting.
Want me to remove the 9 point game because that can be considered an outlier too? Sure, why not.
18.3 PPG on 42.7% shooting.
You know what I call this? A LOSS, free of charge.
You ain't @ me tho. As a stats major and minor in finance, I use stats without judgementThat's because he can't contextualize anything that happens outside of a box score.
- Status